World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 102 561 489 27 26 351 58332

Linda Steg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Steg between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Steg published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2018. 25 of the 519 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2018. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 47 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
1964 2025

519 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Steg: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 0
1995 3
1996 8
1997 2
1998 1
1999 4
2000 6
2001 13
2002 6
2003 9
2004 8
2005 9
2006 9
2007 21
2008 28
2009 13
2010 13
2011 13
2012 28
2013 28
2014 47
2015 19
2016 28
2017 18
2018 48
2019 28
2020 17
2021 32
2022 17
2023 14
2024 11
2025 14
Total 519
Download as CSV

Linda Steg publications per year - data summary

  • Linda Steg, a Psychology scholar from University of Groningen, has 519 publications recorded across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1964 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2018, with 48 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1964, 1966 and 1998, with 1 publication each.
  • 28 of the 62 years in the span carry no publications at all (1965, 1967, 1968, 1969 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 8.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.3 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 88 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1964-1984: 2 publications (0.1 per year); 1985-2005: 71 publications (3.4 per year); 2006-2025: 446 publications (22.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Linda Steg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Steg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 351 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 351
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Steg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Linda Steg, a Psychology scholar from University of Groningen, records 351 publications - the 91st percentile of the discipline.
  • 91% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Linda Steg, and about 9% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Linda Steg ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Linda Steg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Steg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48 102
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Linda Steg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Linda Steg, a Psychology scholar from University of Groningen, records 102 D-Index - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Linda Steg, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Linda Steg ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Linda Steg is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans primarily across the fields of Social Sciences and Environmental Science, with a significant focus on Sociology and Political Science as well as Management, Monitoring, Policy, and Law. Applied Psychology, Marketing, and Global and Planetary Change also constitute important subfields of their work.

The main topics investigated by Linda Steg involve Environmental Education and Sustainability, Climate Change Communication and Perception, and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy. Additional areas of focus include Behavioral Health and Interventions, Environmental Sustainability in Business, Risk Perception and Management, and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance.

Linda Steg has published multiple papers showcased in prominent venues, including:

  • When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions (2020, Global Environmental Change)
  • Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being (2021, Nature Climate Change)
  • To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour (2022, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • Psychology of Climate Change (2022, Annual Review of Psychology)
  • I Am vs. We Are: How Biospheric Values and Environmental Identity of Individuals and Groups Can Influence Pro-environmental Behaviour (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)

Several frequent co-authors have contributed to their publications, including:

  • Goda Perlaviciute
  • Thijs Bouman
  • Ellen van der Werff
  • Anne M. van Valkengoed
  • Lise Jans

The leading publication venues for Linda Steg's work include:

  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • One Earth
  • Energy Research & Social Science
  • Environmental Research Communications

Linda Steg's contributions to the scientific community have been recognized with membership in the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, awarded in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda

    Linda Steg;Charles Vlek

  • A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation

    Wokje Abrahamse;Linda Steg;Charles Vlek;Talib Rothengatter

  • Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use

    Linda Steg

  • Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior How to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic, and Biospheric Value Orientations

    Judith I. M. de Groot;Linda Steg

  • Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior

    Siegwart Lindenberg;Linda Steg

  • Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior A Study into Household Energy Use

    Wouter Poortinga;Linda Steg;Charles Vlek

  • The Spreading of Disorder

    Kees Keizer;Siegwart Lindenberg;Linda Steg

  • An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals

    Linda Steg;Jan Willem Bolderdijk;Kees Keizer;Goda Perlaviciute

  • Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory

    Linda Steg;Lieke Dreijerink;Wokje Abrahamse

  • Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework

    Nma Nicole Huijts;Eje Eric Molin;L Steg

  • Morality and prosocial behavior: the role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model.

    Judith I. M. De Groot;Linda Steg

  • MEASUREMENT AND DETERMINANTS OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT CONSUMER BEHAVIOR

    Birgitta Gatersleben;Linda Steg;Charles Vlek

  • The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents.

    Wokje Abrahamse;Linda Steg;Charles Vlek;Talib Rothengatter

  • How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings?

    Wokje Abrahamse;Linda Steg

  • The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour

    Ellen van der Werff;Linda Steg;Kees Keizer

  • The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions

    Linda Steg;Goda Perlaviciute;Ellen van der Werff;Judith Lurvink

  • Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis

    Wokje Abrahamse;Linda Steg

  • Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour

    Anne M. van Valkengoed;Linda Steg

  • Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries Validity of an Instrument to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic and Biospheric Value Orientations

    Judith I. M. de Groot;Linda Steg

  • SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION AND QUALITY OF LIFE.

    Linda Steg;Robert Gifford

  • ⊡ Human Behavior and Environmental Sustainability: Problems, Driving Forces, and Research Topics

    Charles Vlek;Linda Steg

Frequent Co-Authors

Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen
Wouter Poortinga
Wouter Poortinga Cardiff University
Erik T. Verhoef
Erik T. Verhoef Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Robert Gifford
Robert Gifford University of Victoria
P. Wesley Schultz
P. Wesley Schultz Claremont Graduate University
Paul G. Bain
Paul G. Bain University of Bath
Lorraine Whitmarsh
Lorraine Whitmarsh University of Bath
Piet Rietveld
Piet Rietveld Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Yanjun Guan
Yanjun Guan Durham University
Marcos Silveira Buckeridge
Marcos Silveira Buckeridge Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a variety of online academic options and career paths. Many students are drawn to specialized fields, such as marriage and family therapy (MFT), where demand for qualified professionals is growing.

Aspiring therapists must understand that each state and even city can have unique educational and licensure requirements. For instance, researching how to become a marriage and family therapist in Austin or how to become a marriage and family therapist in Bakersfield will reveal different local guidelines and steps to qualify for practice.

Education is a core requirement, and learners interested in becoming a therapist in other regions should review the Baltimore mft education requirements or Boise mft education requirements to ensure they choose programs that align with local standards.

Whether you are aiming for an online psychology degree or a specialized MFT program, researching local regulations and accredited paths is crucial for a successful career in counseling and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Steg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles