World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Siegwart Lindenberg

Siegwart Lindenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3082 2838 156 149 203 18970

Siegwart Lindenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Siegwart Lindenberg between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Siegwart Lindenberg published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2006. 6 of the 317 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2006. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1974 2025

317 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Siegwart Lindenberg: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 2
1976 2
1977 3
1978 2
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 2
1983 3
1984 3
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 5
1990 2
1991 3
1992 2
1993 4
1994 2
1995 2
1996 18
1997 4
1998 3
1999 3
2000 8
2001 6
2002 9
2003 13
2004 4
2005 13
2006 20
2007 10
2008 11
2009 12
2010 17
2011 12
2012 14
2013 19
2014 14
2015 11
2016 7
2017 6
2018 8
2019 6
2020 5
2021 4
2022 7
2023 2
2024 3
2025 3
Total 317
Download as CSV

Siegwart Lindenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Siegwart Lindenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 203
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Siegwart Lindenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Siegwart Lindenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Siegwart Lindenberg is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily intersects the fields of psychology and social sciences, with notable contributions concentrated in social psychology, safety research, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and strategy and management. Their work engages deeply with topics such as experimental behavioral economics studies, behavioral health and interventions, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, management and organizational studies, mental health research topics, cultural differences and values, and innovation and knowledge management.

The scientist has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include the Academy of Management Review, Journal of Happiness Studies, SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, and Collabra Psychology.

Some recent papers by Siegwart Lindenberg include:

  • The good side of bad examples: Deviance by negative reference groups can increase conformity to one's own norms, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Role of Cognition and Motivation in Understanding Internal Governance and Hierarchical Failure: A Discriminating Alignment Analysis, 2021, Academy of Management Review
  • Regret, Self-regulatory Abilities, and Well-Being: Their Intricate Relationships, 2021, Journal of Happiness Studies
  • The Virtues of Joint Production: Ethical Foundations for Collaborative Organizations, 2022, Academy of Management Review
  • The Interplay Between Status and Affection Needs: Testing the Imbalanced Needs Theory of Aggression in Adulthood, 2022, Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Lindenberg has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Jelle J. Sijtsema, Nicolai J. Foss, Caleb Bernacchio, Frédérique Six, and Kees Keizer. Among these, Jelle J. Sijtsema is noted as a frequent co-author with three joint publications.

The scientist received the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences award in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior

    Siegwart Lindenberg;Linda Steg

  • The Spreading of Disorder

    Kees Keizer;Siegwart Lindenberg;Linda Steg

  • Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: a comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents.

    René Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Andrea F. de Winter

  • Intrinsic motivation in a new light

    Siegwart Lindenberg

  • Old or Frail: What Tells Us More?

    Hanneke Schuurmans;Nardi Steverink;Siegwart Lindenberg;Nynke Frieswijk

  • SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND SOCIAL PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS

    Johan Ormel;Siegwart Lindenberg;Nardi Steverink;Lois M. Verbrugge

  • Empirical test of bullies' status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige

    Jelle J. Sijtsema;Rene Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Christina Salmivalli

  • An Assessment of the New Political Economy: Its Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in Particular

    Siegwart Lindenberg

  • Beyond the Class Norm: Bullying Behavior of Popular Adolescents and its Relation to Peer Acceptance and Rejection

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;René Veenstra

  • The Dyadic Nature of Bullying and Victimization: Testing a Dual-Perspective Theory

    René Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Bonne J. H. Zijlstra;Andrea F. De Winter

  • The Role of Teachers in Bullying: The Relation between Antibullying Attitudes, Efficacy, and Efforts to Reduce Bullying.

    René Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Gijs Huitsing;Miia Sainio

  • Which social needs are important for subjective well-being? What happens to them with aging?

    Nardi Steverink;Siegwart Lindenberg

  • QUALITY OF LIFE AND SOCIAL PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS: A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING HEALTH EFFECTS

    Johan Ormel;Siegwart Lindenberg;Nardi Steverink;Michael Vonkorff

  • Social Rationality versus Rational Egoism

    Siegwart Lindenberg

  • The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences

    René Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Anke Munniksma;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra

  • Managing Joint Production Motivation: The Role of Goal Framing and Governance Mechanisms

    Siegwart Lindenberg;Nicolai Juul Foss

  • Microfoundations for Strategy: A Goal-Framing Perspective on the Drivers of Value Creation

    Nicolai Juul Foss;Siegwart Lindenberg

  • Dimensions of well-being and their measurement : The SPF-IL Scale

    Anna Nieboer;Siegwart Lindenberg;Anne Boomsma;Alinda C. Van Bruggen

  • Social Production Functions, Deficits, and Social Revolutions Prerevolutionary France and Russia

    Siegwart Lindenberg

  • A Theory of Social Thermoregulation in Human Primates

    Hans IJzerman;James A. Coan;Fieke M. A. Wagemans;Marjolein A. Missler

  • Forms and Functions of Aggression in Adolescent Friendship Selection and Influence: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis

    Jelle J. Sijtsema;Tiina Ojanen;Rene Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

René Veenstra
René Veenstra University of Groningen
Linda Steg
Linda Steg University of Groningen
Johan Ormel
Johan Ormel University Medical Center Groningen
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra University of Groningen
Diederik A. Stapel
Diederik A. Stapel Tilburg University
Nardi Steverink
Nardi Steverink University Medical Center Groningen
Nicolai Juul Foss
Nicolai Juul Foss Copenhagen Business School
Frank C. Verhulst
Frank C. Verhulst Erasmus University Rotterdam
Astrid Schütz
Astrid Schütz University of Bamberg
Thomas W. Schubert
Thomas W. Schubert University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of related online degree paths, particularly in counseling. As interest in mental health careers grows, finding accessible education options is crucial for many students. Searching for the affordable online counseling programs in Philadelphia can be a smart starting point if you’re considering studying or working on the East Coast.

For those located further south, the cheapest online counseling programs in Texas offer flexible study options that can be tailored to busy schedules. Nationally, many institutions are working to reduce tuition and provide more flexible formats, as seen in the cheapest online counseling programs in USA rankings.

If you are focused on regional trends and career prospects, reviewing the popular counseling programs in Arizona may offer insight into high-demand fields and emerging opportunities. Ultimately, considering various accredited online programs from all over the country enables students to match their professional goals and budget, setting the stage for rewarding careers in counseling and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Siegwart Lindenberg

Trending Scientists