World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonius H. N. Cillessen

Antonius H. N. Cillessen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1646 1476 96 91 322 23011

Antonius H. N. Cillessen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonius H. N. Cillessen between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonius H. N. Cillessen published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2017. 18 of the 348 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2017. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 12 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 10 publications
1991 2025

348 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonius H. N. Cillessen: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 3
1993 3
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 5
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 8
2004 2
2005 6
2006 7
2007 9
2008 9
2009 1
2010 12
2011 12
2012 21
2013 16
2014 18
2015 23
2016 23
2017 32
2018 20
2019 16
2020 18
2021 19
2022 18
2023 13
2024 8
2025 10
Total 348
Download as CSV

Antonius H. N. Cillessen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonius H. N. Cillessen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 322 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 322
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Antonius H. N. Cillessen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonius H. N. Cillessen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Antonius H. N. Cillessen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and specializes in psychology and social sciences. Their research spans a broad range of topics alongside a substantial publication record.

Their work primarily covers areas such as bullying, victimization, and aggression; child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development; youth development and social support; early childhood education and development; media influence and health; parental involvement in education; and child development and digital technology.

The main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, subfields of study are identified as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Frequently published venues reflect the focus of Antonius H. N. Cillessen's research:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • Emerging Adulthood
  • Social Development
  • Aggressive Behavior

Recent academic papers feature collaborative work across various topics:

  • Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research, 2020, Journal of Adolescence
  • Changes in adolescent loneliness and concomitant changes in fear of negative evaluation and self-esteem, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: teacher perceptions and practices, 2020, Research in Post-Compulsory Education
  • Emerging Adults' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Longitudinal Study on the Importance of Social Support, 2021, Emerging Adulthood
  • Dyadic nominations of bullying: Comparing types of bullies and their victims, 2020, Aggressive Behavior

Co-authorship is a significant aspect of this scientist's research output, with frequent collaboration involving:

  • Yvonne H. M. van den Berg
  • Tessa A. M. Lansu
  • Karin Roelofs
  • Tim Mainhard
  • Anna Tyborowska

Best Publications

  • From Censure to Reinforcement: Developmental Changes in the Association Between Aggression and Social Status

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Lara Mayeux

  • Children's Perceptions of Popular and Unpopular Peers: A Multimethod Assessment

    Kathryn M. LaFontana;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Forms and Functions of Adolescent Peer Aggression Associated With High Levels of Peer Status

    Mitchell J. Prinstein;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Understanding Popularity in the Peer System

    Antonius H.N. Cillessen;Amanda J. Rose

  • Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence.

    Kathryn M. LaFontana;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Social-Cognitive and Behavioral Correlates of Aggression and Victimization in Boys' Play Groups

    David Schwartz;Kenneth A. Dodge;John D. Coie;Julie A. Hubbard

  • Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: a systematic review

    Tirza H. J. van Noorden;Gerbert J. T. Haselager;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;William M. Bukowski

  • Heterogeneity among Peer-Rejected Boys: Subtypes and Stabilities.

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Hendrik W. van IJzendoorn;Cornelis F. M. van Lieshout;Willard W. Hartup

  • Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence

    Eddy H. de Bruyn;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Inge B. Wissink

  • The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression.

    Julie A. Hubbard;Kenneth A. Dodge;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;John D. Coie

  • From indirect aggression to invisible aggression : A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation

    Claire F. Garandeau;Antonius H.N. Cillessen

  • Is Being Popular a Risky Proposition

    Lara Mayeux;Marlene J. Sandstrom;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Stability of Continuous Measures of Sociometric Status: A Meta-Analysis.

    X. Lu Jiang;Antonius H.N. Cillessen

  • Conceptualizing and measuring popularity

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Peter E. L. Marks

  • Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence.

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;X. Lu Jiang;Tessa V. West;Dagmara K. Laszkowski

  • Popularity in Early Adolescence: Prosocial and Antisocial Subtypes

    Eddy H. de Bruyn;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity : A growth curve modelling analysis

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Casey Borch

  • Popularity in the peer system

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;David Schwartz;Lara Mayeux

  • Likeable versus popular : Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment

    Marlene J. Sandstrom;Antonius H.N. Cillessen

  • Clueless or powerful? Identifying subtypes of bullies in adolescence

    Margot Peeters;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Ron H. J. Scholte

Frequent Co-Authors

William M. Bukowski
William M. Bukowski Concordia University
Johan C. Karremans
Johan C. Karremans Radboud University
William J. Burk
William J. Burk Radboud University
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra University of Groningen
Karin Roelofs
Karin Roelofs Radboud University
Anouk Scheres
Anouk Scheres Radboud University
Tom F. M. ter Bogt
Tom F. M. ter Bogt Utrecht University
Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens
Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens Utrecht University
Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Julie A. Hubbard
Julie A. Hubbard University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can also open doors to closely related fields such as Social Work. Many students find these career paths equally rewarding and well aligned with their goals of helping others and understanding human behavior.

If you're considering an online degree in Social Work, it's important to review program affordability and location. For Michigan residents, cheapest social work degrees in Michigan offer practical options. In Minneapolis, students can benefit from a selection of affordable social work degrees in Minneapolis, which may be ideal if you live locally or plan to relocate.

Those based in the South should look into the most affordable social work degree programs in Mississippi that provide flexible online learning opportunities. If you’re drawn to a big-city environment, consider exploring affordable social work programs in New York City for a dynamic learning experience.

Whether you pursue Psychology or a related degree in Social Work, researching affordable and accredited programs can significantly influence your education and career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Antonius H. N. Cillessen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles