World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonius H. N. Cillessen

Antonius H. N. Cillessen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
77
Citations
23011
World Ranking
1646
National Ranking
96

Antonius H. N. Cillessen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonius H. N. Cillessen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 322 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Antonius H. N. Cillessen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonius H. N. Cillessen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonius H. N. Cillessen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and specializes in psychology and social sciences. Their research spans a broad range of topics alongside a substantial publication record.

Their work primarily covers areas such as bullying, victimization, and aggression; child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development; youth development and social support; early childhood education and development; media influence and health; parental involvement in education; and child development and digital technology.

The main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, subfields of study are identified as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Frequently published venues reflect the focus of Antonius H. N. Cillessen's research:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • Emerging Adulthood
  • Social Development
  • Aggressive Behavior

Recent academic papers feature collaborative work across various topics:

  • Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research, 2020, Journal of Adolescence
  • Changes in adolescent loneliness and concomitant changes in fear of negative evaluation and self-esteem, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: teacher perceptions and practices, 2020, Research in Post-Compulsory Education
  • Emerging Adults' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Longitudinal Study on the Importance of Social Support, 2021, Emerging Adulthood
  • Dyadic nominations of bullying: Comparing types of bullies and their victims, 2020, Aggressive Behavior

Co-authorship is a significant aspect of this scientist's research output, with frequent collaboration involving:

  • Yvonne H. M. van den Berg
  • Tessa A. M. Lansu
  • Karin Roelofs
  • Tim Mainhard
  • Anna Tyborowska

Best Publications

  • From Censure to Reinforcement: Developmental Changes in the Association Between Aggression and Social Status

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Lara Mayeux

  • Children's Perceptions of Popular and Unpopular Peers: A Multimethod Assessment

    Kathryn M. LaFontana;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Forms and Functions of Adolescent Peer Aggression Associated With High Levels of Peer Status

    Mitchell J. Prinstein;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Understanding Popularity in the Peer System

    Antonius H.N. Cillessen;Amanda J. Rose

  • Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence.

    Kathryn M. LaFontana;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Social-Cognitive and Behavioral Correlates of Aggression and Victimization in Boys' Play Groups

    David Schwartz;Kenneth A. Dodge;John D. Coie;Julie A. Hubbard

  • Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: a systematic review

    Tirza H. J. van Noorden;Gerbert J. T. Haselager;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;William M. Bukowski

  • Heterogeneity among Peer-Rejected Boys: Subtypes and Stabilities.

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Hendrik W. van IJzendoorn;Cornelis F. M. van Lieshout;Willard W. Hartup

  • Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence

    Eddy H. de Bruyn;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Inge B. Wissink

  • The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression.

    Julie A. Hubbard;Kenneth A. Dodge;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;John D. Coie

  • From indirect aggression to invisible aggression : A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation

    Claire F. Garandeau;Antonius H.N. Cillessen

  • Is Being Popular a Risky Proposition

    Lara Mayeux;Marlene J. Sandstrom;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Stability of Continuous Measures of Sociometric Status: A Meta-Analysis.

    X. Lu Jiang;Antonius H.N. Cillessen

  • Conceptualizing and measuring popularity

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Peter E. L. Marks

  • Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence.

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;X. Lu Jiang;Tessa V. West;Dagmara K. Laszkowski

  • Popularity in Early Adolescence: Prosocial and Antisocial Subtypes

    Eddy H. de Bruyn;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity : A growth curve modelling analysis

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Casey Borch

  • Popularity in the peer system

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;David Schwartz;Lara Mayeux

  • Likeable versus popular : Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment

    Marlene J. Sandstrom;Antonius H.N. Cillessen

  • Clueless or powerful? Identifying subtypes of bullies in adolescence

    Margot Peeters;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Ron H. J. Scholte

Frequent Co-Authors

William M. Bukowski
William M. Bukowski Concordia University
Johan C. Karremans
Johan C. Karremans Radboud University
William J. Burk
William J. Burk Radboud University
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra University of Groningen
Karin Roelofs
Karin Roelofs Radboud University
Anouk Scheres
Anouk Scheres Radboud University
Tom F. M. ter Bogt
Tom F. M. ter Bogt Utrecht University
Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens
Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens Utrecht University
Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Julie A. Hubbard
Julie A. Hubbard University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can also open doors to closely related fields such as Social Work. Many students find these career paths equally rewarding and well aligned with their goals of helping others and understanding human behavior.

If you're considering an online degree in Social Work, it's important to review program affordability and location. For Michigan residents, cheapest social work degrees in Michigan offer practical options. In Minneapolis, students can benefit from a selection of affordable social work degrees in Minneapolis, which may be ideal if you live locally or plan to relocate.

Those based in the South should look into the most affordable social work degree programs in Mississippi that provide flexible online learning opportunities. If you’re drawn to a big-city environment, consider exploring affordable social work programs in New York City for a dynamic learning experience.

Whether you pursue Psychology or a related degree in Social Work, researching affordable and accredited programs can significantly influence your education and career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Antonius H. N. Cillessen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles