World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9338 8729 406 392 76 9952

Anouk Scheres publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anouk Scheres between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anouk Scheres published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2000. 7 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2000. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1999 2025

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anouk Scheres: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 7
2001 3
2002 0
2003 3
2004 1
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 6
2009 0
2010 4
2011 1
2012 0
2013 2
2014 5
2015 2
2016 4
2017 7
2018 2
2019 4
2020 3
2021 5
2022 1
2023 3
2024 4
2025 3
Total 83
Download as CSV

Anouk Scheres publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anouk Scheres sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 76
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anouk Scheres D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anouk Scheres sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anouk Scheres is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and medicine, with particular attention to psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and developmental and educational psychology.

The main research topics covered by Scheres include attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, behavioral and psychological studies, behavioral health and interventions, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and mental health research topics.

Frequent publication venues for Anouk Scheres include the Journal of Attention Disorders, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Current Opinion in Psychology, and Frontiers in Psychology.

Recent papers associated with their work include:

  • The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder (2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Impulsive and risky decision-making in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): The need for a developmental perspective (2021, Current Opinion in Psychology)
  • Feasibility, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of a New Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for College Students with ADHD (2020, Journal of Attention Disorders)
  • Studying Motivation in ADHD: The Role of Internal Motives and the Relevance of Self Determination Theory (2021, Journal of Attention Disorders)
  • A Dyadic Test of the Association Between Trait Self-Control and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)

Frequent co-authors in Scheres' publications include Arnt Schellekens, Mary V. Solanto, Floor Burghoorn, Karin Roelofs, and Bernd Figner.

Best Publications

  • Functional Connectivity of Human Striatum: A Resting State fMRI Study

    A. Di Martino;A.P.J. Scheres;D.S. Margulies;A.M.C. Kelly

  • Varieties of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Related Intra-Individual Variability

    F. Xavier Castellanos;Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke;Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke;Anouk Scheres;Adriana Di Martino

  • Ventral Striatal Hyporesponsiveness During Reward Anticipation in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Anouk Scheres;Michael P. Milham;Brian Knutson;Francisco Xavier Castellanos

  • The top and the bottom of ADHD: a neuropsychological perspective

    Joseph A Sergeant;Hilde Geurts;Stephan Huijbregts;Anouk Scheres

  • Ventral–striatal responsiveness during reward anticipation in ADHD and its relation to trait impulsivity in the healthy population: A meta-analytic review of the fMRI literature

    Michael M. Plichta;Anouk Scheres

  • Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: effects of age and ADHD symptoms.

    Anouk Scheres;Anouk Scheres;Marianne Dijkstra;Eleanor Ainslie;Jaclyn Balkan

  • Identifying the neurobiology of altered reinforcement sensitivity in ADHD: A review and research agenda

    Marjolein Luman;Gail Tripp;Anouk Scheres;Anouk Scheres

  • Which Executive Functioning Deficits Are Associated With AD/HD, ODD/CD and Comorbid AD/HD+ODD/CD?

    Jaap Oosterlaan;Anouk Scheres;Joseph A. Sergeant

  • Executive functioning in boys with ADHD: Primarily an inhibition deficit?

    Anouk Scheres;Jaap Oosterlaan;Hilde Geurts;Sharon Morein-Zamir

  • Response execution and inhibition in children with AD/HD and other disruptive disorders: the role of behavioural activation.

    Anouk Scheres;Jaap Oosterlaan;Joseph A. Sergeant

  • Residual functional connectivity in the split-brain revealed with resting-state functional MRI.

    Lucina Q. Uddin;Eric Mooshagian;Eran Zaidel;Anouk Scheres

  • The effect of methylphenidate on three forms of response inhibition in boys with AD/HD.

    Anouk Scheres;Jaap Oosterlaan;James Swanson;Sharon Morein-Zamir

  • Temporal reward discounting and ADHD: task and symptom specific effects.

    A.P.J. Scheres;A. Lee;M. Sumiya

  • Temporal Reward Discounting in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: The Contribution of Symptom Domains, Reward Magnitude, and Session Length

    Anouk Scheres;Anouk Scheres;Chandra Tontsch;Allison Lee Thoeny;Antonia Kaczkurkin

  • Understanding decision-making deficits in neurological conditions: insights from models of natural action selection.

    Michael J Frank;Anouk Scheres;Scott J Sherman

  • Delta Plots in the study of individual differences: New tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/HD that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment

    K.R. Ridderinkhof;A.P.J. Scheres;J. Oosterlaan;J.A. Sergeant

  • Neural and behavioral correlates of expectancy violations in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Sarah Durston;Matthew C. Davidson;Matthew C. Davidson;Martijn J. Mulder;Julie A. Spicer

  • Individual differences in decision making: Drive and reward responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games

    Anouk Scheres;Alan G Sanfey

  • Response inhibition in children with DSM-IV subtypes of AD/HD and related disruptive disorders: the role of reward.

    Anouk Scheres;Jaap Oosterlaan;Joseph A. Sergeant

  • Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review.

    Hanneke Scholten;Anouk Scheres;Erik de Water;Erik de Water;Uta Graf

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaap Oosterlaan
Jaap Oosterlaan University of Amsterdam
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
F. Xavier Castellanos
F. Xavier Castellanos New York University
Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke
Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke King's College London
Jan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar Radboud University
Michael J. Frank
Michael J. Frank Brown University
Herbert Roeyers
Herbert Roeyers Ghent University
Mary V. Solanto
Mary V. Solanto Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Hilde M. Geurts
Hilde M. Geurts University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in psychology, exploring related online degrees—such as counseling—can open up diverse and rewarding career pathways. Accredited online counseling programs offer flexibility for working adults, career changers, and recent graduates alike. With mental health professionals in growing demand nationwide, pursuing counseling as a degree or specialization is a practical step toward making a difference in your community.

A common concern for students is cost. It's important to seek out the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania or other states that fit your budget. Those based in urban areas may appreciate a city-specific list of affordable online counseling programs in Philadelphia, while students in the South can benefit from insights about affordable online counseling degrees in Texas.

Remember that affordability doesn't have to compromise program quality. National overviews, such as the cheapest online counseling degrees in USA, can offer a broad perspective as you compare programs. With the right degree, you can pursue roles in clinical counseling, school guidance, social work, or research—each offering the chance to positively impact mental health and well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Anouk Scheres

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles