World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jennifer A. Logan

Jennifer A. Logan

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
92
Citations
40274
World Ranking
538
National Ranking
242

Jennifer A. Logan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer A. Logan sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 201 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Jennifer A. Logan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer A. Logan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jennifer A. Logan is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on Medicine with specific contributions to Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Clock Proteins Have the Potential to Improve Term Delivery Date Prediction: A Proof-of-Concept Study, 2025, Life
  • A-343 Using a ratio-metric approach to evaluate home-collected blood samples: a proof-of-concept study applied to predicting time to birth in term pregnancies, 2025, Clinical Chemistry

Jennifer A. Logan has worked frequently with several co-authors, and notable collaborators include:

  • Max T. Dufford
  • Tracey C. Fleischer
  • Laura Sommerville
  • Ashoka D. Polpitiya
  • Angela Fox

The venues where their work has appeared most frequently are:

  • Life
  • Clinical Chemistry

The main research topics addressed across Logan's work are:

  • Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

Jennifer A. Logan has been recognized with fellowship awards from professional organizations, including:

  • Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2001
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1997

Best Publications

  • Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology : Model description and evaluation

    Isabelle Bey;Daniel James Jacob;Robert M. Yantosca;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective

    Jennifer A. Logan;Michael J. Prather;Steven C. Wofsy;Michael B. McElroy

  • Tropospheric Aerosol Optical Thickness from the GOCART Model and Comparisons with Satellite and Sun Photometer Measurements

    Mian Chin;Paul Ginoux;Stefan Kinne;Stefan Kinne;Omar Torres;Omar Torres

  • Tropospheric ozone: Seasonal behavior, trends, and anthropogenic influence

    Jennifer A. Logan

  • Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to First- and Second-Generation ALK Inhibitors in ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancer

    Justin F. Gainor;Leila Dardaei;Satoshi Yoda;Luc Friboulet

  • Nitrogen oxides in the troposphere: Global and regional budgets

    Jennifer A. Logan

  • Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation

    C. M. Spivakovsky;J. A. Logan;S. A. Montzka;Y. J. Balkanski

  • Reductions of Antarctic ozone due to synergistic interactions of chlorine and bromine

    Michael B. McElroy;Ross J. Salawitch;Steven C. Wofsy;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Global simulation of tropospheric O3-NOx-hydrocarbon chemistry: 1. Model formulation

    Yuhang Wang;Daniel James Jacob;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations

    Bryan N. Duncan;Bryan N. Duncan;Randall V. Martin;Amanda C. Staudt;Amanda C. Staudt;Rosemarie Yevich

  • The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes

    Sanford Sillman;Jennifer A. Logan;Steven C. Wofsy

  • An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world

    Rosemarie Yevich;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Radiative forcing of climate by changes in the vertical distribution of ozone

    Andrew A. Lacis;Donald J. Wuebbles;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Global gridded inventories of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur and nitrogen

    Carmen M. Benkovitz;M. Trevor Scholtz;Jozef Pacyna;Leonor Tarrasón

  • Distribution of tropospheric ozone determined from satellite data

    Jack Fishman;Catherine E. Watson;Jack C. Larsen;Jennifer A. Logan

  • An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere : recommendations for testing 3-D models and development of a gridded climatology for tropospheric ozone

    Jennifer A. Logan

  • Effect of rising Asian emissions on surface ozone in the United States

    Daniel James Jacob;Jennifer A. Logan;Prashant P. Murti

  • Impacts of climate change from 2000 to 2050 on wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations in the western United States

    D. V. Spracklen;D. V. Spracklen;L. J. Mickley;J. A. Logan;R. C. Hudman;R. C. Hudman

  • Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data

    Lee Thomas Murray;Daniel J. Jacob;Jennifer A. Logan;Rynda C. Hudman;Rynda C. Hudman

  • Global inventory of sulfur emissions with 1°×1° resolution

    Peter A. Spiro;Daniel James Jacob;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Molecular mechanisms of resistance to first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged lung cancer

    J. Gainor;L. Dardaei;S. Yoda;L. Friboulet

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Jacob
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Robert M. Yantosca
Robert M. Yantosca Harvard University
Bryan N. Duncan
Bryan N. Duncan Goddard Space Flight Center
Dylan B. A. Jones
Dylan B. A. Jones University of Toronto
Paul I. Palmer
Paul I. Palmer University of Edinburgh
Helen M. Worden
Helen M. Worden National Center for Atmospheric Research
Loretta J. Mickley
Loretta J. Mickley Harvard University
Steven C. Wofsy
Steven C. Wofsy Harvard University
Michael J. Prather
Michael J. Prather University of California, Irvine
Isabelle Bey
Isabelle Bey Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Individuals seeking flexible, advanced options might consider doctoral programs online no dissertation, which offer a streamlined path to leadership roles without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Educators and professionals aiming to deepen their expertise can benefit from some of the best eds to edd programs available online. These programs blend practical skills with research, preparing graduates for impactful roles in policy or academia within environmental fields.

For those passionate about social impact related to environmental and community issues, pursuing dsw programs online offers an affordable way to specialize in social work leadership. This pathway supports careers that intersect environmental justice and human services.

Additionally, students looking for budget-friendly options might explore low cost online general studies degree programs. These offer broad academic foundations allowing for customization toward environmental interests, making them a versatile starting point for diverse career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer A. Logan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles