World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
9361
World Ranking
3534
National Ranking
1342

Wayne M. Angevine publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne M. Angevine sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Wayne M. Angevine D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne M. Angevine sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wayne M. Angevine is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences with numerous contributions to the subfields of Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Computational Mechanics.

The main topics covered in their work include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Climate variability and models, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Wind and Air Flow Studies, Air Quality and Health Impacts, and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows.

They have published research in several frequent venues, such as Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Monthly Weather Review, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, and Environmental Science & Technology.

  • Transition Periods in the Diurnally-Varying Atmospheric Boundary Layer Over Land (2020, Boundary-Layer Meteorology)
  • Demistify: a large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) intercomparison of radiation fog (2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • Scale Awareness, Resolved Circulations, and Practical Limits in the MYNN-EDMF Boundary Layer and Shallow Cumulus Scheme (2020, Monthly Weather Review)
  • Errors in top-down estimates of emissions using a known source (2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • Were Wildfires Responsible for the Unusually High Surface Ozone in Colorado During 2021? (2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)

Wayne M. Angevine also contributed a chapter titled "What's Next: Boundary Layer Prediction Methods (Chapter 5)" published in 2022 by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Frequent collaborators include Margaret A. LeMone, David D. Turner, Robert S. Arthur, John Edwards, and Marie Lothon.

Best Publications

  • Boundary Layer Height and Entrainment Zone Thickness Measured by Lidars and Wind-Profiling Radars

    Stephen A. Cohn;Wayne M. Angevine

  • Effect of petrochemical industrial emissions of reactive alkenes and NOx on tropospheric ozone formation in Houston, Texas

    T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;C. A. Brock;C. A. Brock

  • Boundary-layer depth and entrainment zone characterization with a boundary-layer profiler

    Wayne M. Angevine;Allen B. White;S. K. Avery

  • The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF version 3.1

    J Brioude;J Brioude;D Arnold;D Arnold;Andreas Stohl;Massimo Cassiani

  • Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena, California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign

    P. L. Hayes;A. M. Ortega;M. J. Cubison;K. D. Froyd;K. D. Froyd

  • Developments in UHF lower tropospheric wind profiling at NOAA's Aeronomy Laboratory

    D. A. Carter;K. S. Gage;W. L. Ecklund;W. M. Angevine

  • The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study

    T. B. Ryerson;A. E. Andrews;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;T. S. Bates

  • Evaluation of the Diurnal Cycle in the atmospheric boundary layer over land as represented by a variety of single-column models: The second GABLS Experiment

    Gunilla Svensson;A. A. M. Holtslag;V. Kumar;T. Mauritsen

  • The BLLAST field experiment: Boundary-Layer Late Afternoon and Sunset Turbulence

    M. Lothon;F. Lohou;D. Pino;F. Couvreux

  • Signatures of terminal alkene oxidation in airborne formaldehyde measurements during TexAQS 2000

    B. P. Wert;B. P. Wert;M. Trainer;A. Fried;T. B. Ryerson

  • Nighttime removal of NOx in the summer marine boundary layer

    S. S. Brown;S. S. Brown;J. E. Dibb;H. Stark;H. Stark;M. Aldener;M. Aldener

  • Top-down estimate of surface flux in the Los Angeles Basin using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique: assessing anthropogenic emissions of CO, NO x and CO 2 and their impacts

    J. Brioude;J. Brioude;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov;S.-W. Kim;S.-W. Kim

  • Performance of an Eddy Diffusivity-Mass Flux Scheme for Shallow Cumulus Boundary Layers

    Wayne M. Angevine;Hongli Jiang;Thorsten Mauritsen

  • Evaluation of urban surface parameterizations in the WRF model using measurements during the Texas Air Quality Study 2006 field campaign

    S.-H. Lee;S.-H. Lee;S.-W. Kim;S.-W. Kim;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;L. Bianco;L. Bianco

  • High resolution vertical distributions of NO 3 and N 2 O 5 through the nocturnal boundary layer

    S. S. Brown;W. P. Dubé;W. P. Dubé;H. D. Osthoff;H. D. Osthoff;D. E. Wolfe

  • Atmospheric emissions from the Deepwater Horizon spill constrain air‐water partitioning, hydrocarbon fate, and leak rate

    T. B. Ryerson;K. C. Aikin;K. C. Aikin;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;E. L. Atlas

  • Improving Wind Energy Forecasting through Numerical Weather Prediction Model Development

    Joseph B. Olson;Jaymes S. Kenyon;Irina Djalalova;Laura Bianco

  • Multisensor Estimation of Mixing Heights over a Coastal City

    John W. Nielsen-Gammon;Christina L. Powell;M. J. Mahoney;Wayne M. Angevine

  • Observations Of The Morning Transition Of The Convective Boundary Layer

    Wayne M. Angevine;Henk Klein Baltink;Fred C. Bosveld

  • The glyoxal budget and its contribution to organic aerosol for Los Angeles, California, during CalNex 2010

    R. A. Washenfelder;R. A. Washenfelder;C. J. Young;C. J. Young;S. S. Brown;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine

  • 100 years of progress in boundary layer meteorology

    Margaret A. LeMone;Wayne M. Angevine;Wayne M. Angevine;Christopher S. Bretherton;Fei Chen

  • Observations of the afternoon transition of the convective boundary layer

    Alison W. Grimsdell;Wayne M. Angevine

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart A. McKeen
Stuart A. McKeen National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jerome Brioude
Jerome Brioude University of La Réunion
Michael Trainer
Michael Trainer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
John S. Holloway
John S. Holloway National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
J. A. de Gouw
J. A. de Gouw University of Colorado Boulder
Christoph J. Senff
Christoph J. Senff National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Eric J. Williams
Eric J. Williams National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gregory J. Frost
Gregory J. Frost National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many programs balance rigorous coursework with accessibility, and some of the easy bachelor degrees offer a practical starting point for those wanting to enter the field without overwhelming complexity.

Specializing as an online geologist is a popular path, combining earth sciences with modern technology. Numerous options exist for a geologist degree online, providing flexibility for working students and access to cutting-edge geology research and applications.

Another growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which involves spatial data analysis vital for environmental planning and management. Prospective students can explore top programs offering a geographic information systems degree designed to develop skills applicable across environmental science sectors.

For those interested in public service and leadership roles related to environmental policy, pursuing a 1 year MPA program online can be a strategic choice. These programs focus on management and administration, equipping graduates to influence sustainable environmental policies efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Wayne M. Angevine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles