World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
91
Citations
19398
World Ranking
567
National Ranking
256

William C. Kuster publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C. Kuster sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 201 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

William C. Kuster D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C. Kuster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

William C. Kuster is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with specific contributions to Earth and planetary sciences. Their work spans several subfields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, atmospheric science, and environmental engineering.

Kuster's research explores topics related to air quality and health impacts, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and air quality monitoring and forecasting. These themes are reflected consistently in their recent publications and collaborative efforts.

The scientist has authored several papers, including the following recent publications:

  • Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality (2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
  • Measurements of Total OH Reactivity During CalNex-LA (2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • Organosulfates as Tracers for Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Formation from 2-Methyl-3-Buten-2-ol (MBO) in the Atmosphere (2020, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University))

Kuster frequently collaborates with several coauthors, notably including:

  • J. B. Gilman (3 coauthored works)
  • J. A. de Gouw (3 coauthored works)
  • Pedro Campuzano-Jost (2 coauthored works)
  • Douglas A. Day (2 coauthored works)
  • C. Warneke (2 coauthored works)

The scientist's work has been published in a range of venues such as Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, and OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University), each with multiple contributions.

The research conducted by Kuster contributes to a deeper understanding of secondary organic aerosols, their formation, and their impact on air pollution and associated health outcomes. Their studies include the chemical characterization of atmospheric compounds and monitoring of reactive species relevant to air quality.

Best Publications

  • Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: Results from the New England Air Quality Study in 2002

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;A. M. Middlebrook;C. Warneke;C. Warneke;P. D. Goldan

  • Source signature of volatile organic compounds from oil and natural gas operations in northeastern Colorado.

    J. B. Gilman;B. M. Lerner;W. C. Kuster;J. A. de Gouw

  • Effect of petrochemical industrial emissions of reactive alkenes and NOx on tropospheric ozone formation in Houston, Texas

    T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;C. A. Brock;C. A. Brock

  • Source apportionment of ambient volatile organic compounds in Beijing.

    Yu Song;Min Shao;Ying Liu;Sihua Lu

  • Observations of Ozone Formation in Power Plant Plumes and Implications for Ozone Control Strategies

    T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;J. S. Holloway;J. S. Holloway;D. D. Parrish

  • Coupling field and laboratory measurements to estimate the emission factors of identified and unidentified trace gases for prescribed fires

    Robert J. Yokelson;I. R. Burling;J. Gilman;J. Gilman;C. Warneke;C. Warneke

  • Chemical and physical transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass burning emissions in an environmental chamber

    C. J. Hennigan;M. A. Miracolo;G. J. Engelhart;A. A. May

  • Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds: A Large Source of Secondary Organic Aerosol

    Yunliang Zhao;Christopher J. Hennigan;Andrew A. May;Daniel S. Tkacik

  • Validation of atmospheric VOC measurements by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry using a gas-chromatographic preseparation method.

    Carsten Warneke;Joost A De Gouw;William C Kuster;Paul D Goldan

  • Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena, California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign

    P. L. Hayes;A. M. Ortega;M. J. Cubison;K. D. Froyd;K. D. Froyd

  • Determination of urban volatile organic compound emission ratios and comparison with an emissions database

    Carsten Warneke;Carsten Warneke;S. A. McKeen;J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;P. D. Goldan

  • Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry as a New Tool for Real Time Analysis of Root-Secreted Volatile Organic Compounds in Arabidopsis

    Marco Steeghs;Harsh Pal Bais;Joost de Gouw;Paul Goldan

  • Validation of proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) measurements of gas-phase organic compounds in the atmosphere during the New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS) in 2002

    J. A. de Gouw;P. D. Goldan;C. Warneke;W. C. Kuster

  • Biomass burning emissions and potential air quality impacts of volatile organic compounds and other trace gases from fuels common in the US

    J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman;B. M. Lerner;B. M. Lerner;W. C. Kuster;W. C. Kuster;P. D. Goldan;P. D. Goldan

  • Emission ratios of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds in northern mid‐latitude megacities: Observations versus emission inventories in Los Angeles and Paris

    Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman;W. C. Kuster;W. C. Kuster;N. Grand

  • Hydrocarbon measurements in the southeastern United States: The Rural Oxidants in the Southern Environment (ROSE) Program 1990

    Paul D. Goldan;William C. Kuster;Fred C. Fehsenfeld;Stephen A. Montzka

  • Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California

    J. Peischl;J. Peischl;T. B. Ryerson;J. Brioude;J. Brioude;K. C. Aikin;K. C. Aikin

  • Emissions lifetimes and ozone formation in power plant plumes

    T. B. Ryerson;M. P. Buhr;G. J. Frost;P. D. Goldan

  • Gasoline emissions dominate over diesel in formation of secondary organic aerosol mass

    R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini;A. M. Middlebrook;J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;C. Warneke;C. Warneke

  • Effects of mixing on evolution of hydrocarbon ratios in the troposphere

    David D. Parrish;A. Stohl;C. Forster;E. L. Atlas

  • Isocyanic acid in the atmosphere and its possible link to smoke-related health effects.

    James M. Roberts;Patrick R. Veres;Anthony K. Cochran;Carsten Warneke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jessica B. Gilman
Jessica B. Gilman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
J. A. de Gouw
J. A. de Gouw University of Colorado Boulder
Paul D. Goldan
Paul D. Goldan Earth System Research Laboratory
Fred C. Fehsenfeld
Fred C. Fehsenfeld Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Brian M. Lerner
Brian M. Lerner Aerodyne Research
Eric J. Williams
Eric J. Williams National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
John S. Holloway
John S. Holloway National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Michael Trainer
Michael Trainer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider flexible options like online eds to edd programs, which provide advanced education leadership skills applicable in policy-making and community engagement within the environmental sector.

Social work also intersects with environmental studies, especially in community resilience and advocacy. Prospective students may find valuable resources in fully funded dsw programs online, blending social impact with sustainability efforts.

For those seeking broader educational foundations, affordable options like best affordable online general studies degree programs can provide interdisciplinary knowledge that complements environmental expertise and enhances employability.

Additionally, students interested in completing their education efficiently might explore the easiest bachelor degree options to quickly build credentials while gaining practical skills relevant to environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing William C. Kuster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles