World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
91
Citations
21710
World Ranking
566
National Ranking
255

John S. Holloway publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Holloway sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 180 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John S. Holloway D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Holloway sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United States Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Meteorology
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Oxygen

His primary areas of study are Meteorology, Atmospheric sciences, Aerosol, Plume and Air quality index. His Ozone and Atmosphere study in the realm of Meteorology interacts with subjects such as NOx and Nitrogen oxide. His work in the fields of Atmospheric sciences, such as Troposphere, overlaps with other areas such as Urban area.

As a part of the same scientific study, John S. Holloway usually deals with the Aerosol, concentrating on Arctic and frequently concerns with Biomass. Specifically, his work in Plume is concerned with the study of Panache. His studies in Environmental chemistry integrate themes in fields like Oceanography and Radiocarbon dating.

His most cited work include:

  • A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States (408 citations)
  • A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States (408 citations)
  • A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry (379 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Atmospheric sciences, Aerosol, Ozone, Meteorology and NOx. His Atmospheric sciences study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Atmosphere, Plume and Air quality index. His work on Panache as part of general Plume research is frequently linked to Carbon black, bridging the gap between disciplines.

In Aerosol, John S. Holloway works on issues like Environmental chemistry, which are connected to Mineralogy. His Tropospheric ozone study in the realm of Ozone connects with subjects such as Peroxyacetyl nitrate, Reactive nitrogen and Volatile organic compound. His work on Nitrogen oxide as part of general NOx research is often related to Nitrogen dioxide, Nitrogen oxides and Weather Research and Forecasting Model, thus linking different fields of science.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (89.18%)
  • Aerosol (69.78%)
  • Ozone (57.46%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2019)?

  • Atmospheric sciences (89.18%)
  • NOx (52.24%)
  • Ozone (57.46%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

John S. Holloway spends much of his time researching Atmospheric sciences, NOx, Ozone, Aerosol and Climatology. His work in Atmospheric sciences tackles topics such as In situ which are related to areas like Aerosol extinction. His Ozone study incorporates themes from Lidar and Stratosphere.

His research in Aerosol intersects with topics in Environmental engineering and Outflow. The various areas that John S. Holloway examines in his Climatology study include Air quality index and Mixing ratio. His Emission inventory study in the realm of Air quality index interacts with subjects such as Nitrogen oxide.

Between 2014 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions (125 citations)
  • Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions (125 citations)
  • Formaldehyde Production from Isoprene Oxidation Across NOx Regimes (70 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Meteorology
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Oxygen

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Atmospheric sciences, Mixing ratio, Aerosol, Troposphere and Climatology. The study incorporates disciplines such as Planetary boundary layer and Atmosphere, Atmospheric methane in addition to Atmospheric sciences. John S. Holloway studied Mixing ratio and Ozone that intersect with Photochemistry.

His Aerosol research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Environmental engineering and Outflow. His Troposphere research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Mixed layer, Front, Extinction and Trace gas. His Air quality index research is classified as research in Meteorology.

Best Publications

  • A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry

    Joel A. Thornton;James P. Kercher;Theran P. Riedel;Nicholas L. Wagner

  • A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States

    Rodney J. Weber;Amy P. Sullivan;Amy P. Sullivan;Richard E. Peltier;Armistead Russell

  • Emissions from biomass burning in the Yucatan

    R. J. Yokelson;J. D. Crounse;P. F. DeCarlo;P. F. DeCarlo;T. Karl

  • Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions

    J. P. Schwarz;J. P. Schwarz;R. S. Gao;J. R. Spackman;J. R. Spackman;L. A. Watts;L. A. Watts

  • Export of north american ozone pollution to the north atlantic ocean.

    David D. Parrish;John S. Holloway;Michael Trainer;Paul C. Murphy

  • Effect of petrochemical industrial emissions of reactive alkenes and NOx on tropospheric ozone formation in Houston, Texas

    T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;C. A. Brock;C. A. Brock

  • Relationships between ozone and carbon monoxide at surface sites in the North Atlantic region

    D. D. Parrish;M. Trainer;J. S. Holloway;J. E. Yee

  • Observations of Ozone Formation in Power Plant Plumes and Implications for Ozone Control Strategies

    T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;J. S. Holloway;J. S. Holloway;D. D. Parrish

  • Organic aerosol formation in urban and industrial plumes near Houston and Dallas, Texas

    R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini;B. Ervens;B. Ervens;A. M. Middlebrook;C. Warneke;C. Warneke

  • Surface and Lightning Sources of Nitrogen Oxides over the United States: Magnitudes, Chemical Evolution, and Outflow

    R C Hudman;D J Jacob;S Turquety;Eric M Leibensperger

  • Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena, California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign

    P. L. Hayes;A. M. Ortega;M. J. Cubison;K. D. Froyd;K. D. Froyd

  • Multiyear trends in volatile organic compounds in Los Angeles, California: Five decades of decreasing emissions

    Carsten Warneke;Carsten Warneke;Joost A. de Gouw;Joost A. de Gouw;John S. Holloway;John S. Holloway;Jeff Peischl;Jeff Peischl

  • Determination of urban volatile organic compound emission ratios and comparison with an emissions database

    Carsten Warneke;Carsten Warneke;S. A. McKeen;J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;P. D. Goldan

  • Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western United States in spring

    Meiyun Lin;Meiyun Lin;Arlene M. Fiore;Arlene M. Fiore;Larry W. Horowitz;Owen R. Cooper;Owen R. Cooper

  • Biomass burning in Siberia and Kazakhstan as an important source for haze over the Alaskan Arctic in April 2008

    C. Warneke;C. Warneke;R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini;J. Brioude;J. Brioude;C. A. Brock

  • Effects of changing power plant NOx emissions on ozone in the eastern United States: Proof of concept

    G. J. Frost;G. J. Frost;S. A. McKeen;S. A. McKeen;M. Trainer;T. B. Ryerson

  • Characteristics, sources, and transport of aerosols measured in spring 2008 during the aerosol, radiation, and cloud processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) Project

    C. A. Brock;J. Cozic;J. Cozic;R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini;K. D. Froyd;K. D. Froyd

  • Emission ratios of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds in northern mid‐latitude megacities: Observations versus emission inventories in Los Angeles and Paris

    Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman;W. C. Kuster;W. C. Kuster;N. Grand

  • Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California

    J. Peischl;J. Peischl;T. B. Ryerson;J. Brioude;J. Brioude;K. C. Aikin;K. C. Aikin

  • Emission sources and ocean uptake of acetonitrile (CH3CN) in the atmosphere

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;C. Warneke;C. Warneke;D. D. Parrish;J. S. Holloway;J. S. Holloway

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
J. A. de Gouw
J. A. de Gouw University of Colorado Boulder
Fred C. Fehsenfeld
Fred C. Fehsenfeld Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Michael Trainer
Michael Trainer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
J. A. Neuman
J. A. Neuman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
John B. Nowak
John B. Nowak Langley Research Center
Gerhard Hübler
Gerhard Hübler University of Colorado Boulder
David D. Parrish
David D. Parrish Jinan University
Stuart A. McKeen
Stuart A. McKeen National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens the door to a variety of related online programs that can complement or expand your expertise. For instance, specializing in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is invaluable for environmental data analysis and decision-making. Explore the best gis graduate programs to find top-tier options that fit your career goals.

Leadership roles in environmental policy and management often require advanced administrative skills. Online Master of Public Administration programs, particularly 1 year mpa programs, offer accelerated pathways to develop strategic skills while maintaining your professional momentum.

Understanding human behavior and society is key in addressing environmental issues through public engagement and policy. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide this critical foundation for interdisciplinary work.

For educators looking to specialize in environmental education, a Doctor of Education degree can be highly beneficial. Some may prefer programs without the traditional research demands, such as those identified in the edd no dissertation category, focusing more on practical leadership and application.

These online degrees offer flexible, high-quality options to help you build a sustainable and impactful career in the environmental field.

Best Scientists Citing John S. Holloway

Recently Published Articles