World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David D. Parrish

David D. Parrish

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
China
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
111
Citations
34089
World Ranking
192
National Ranking
20

David D. Parrish publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Parrish sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 284 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David D. Parrish D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Parrish sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in China Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in China Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Meteorology
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Oxygen

David D. Parrish focuses on Ozone, Meteorology, Atmospheric sciences, Plume and NOx. His studies in Ozone integrate themes in fields like Peroxyacetyl nitrate and Troposphere. His Troposphere study is concerned with the field of Climatology as a whole.

All of his Meteorology and Aerosol and Air quality index investigations are sub-components of the entire Meteorology study. His Plume research incorporates themes from Environmental chemistry and Atmosphere. His work is dedicated to discovering how NOx, Tropospheric ozone are connected with Atmospheric dispersion modeling, Transect and Petrochemical and other disciplines.

His most cited work include:

  • Models and observations of the impact of natural hydrocarbons on rural ozone (430 citations)
  • Export of north american ozone pollution to the north atlantic ocean. (266 citations)
  • Effect of petrochemical industrial emissions of reactive alkenes and NOx on tropospheric ozone formation in Houston, Texas (255 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Atmospheric sciences, Ozone, Troposphere, Meteorology and Climatology are his primary areas of study. His Atmospheric sciences study typically links adjacent topics like Atmosphere. David D. Parrish has included themes like Environmental chemistry, NOx and Air quality index in his Ozone study.

His research in Troposphere tackles topics such as Planetary boundary layer which are related to areas like Hydrology. His Aerosol study in the realm of Meteorology connects with subjects such as Lagrangian. His Climatology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Baseline and Inflow.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (60.25%)
  • Ozone (58.39%)
  • Troposphere (40.99%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Atmospheric sciences (60.25%)
  • Ozone (58.39%)
  • Tropospheric ozone (23.60%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Atmospheric sciences, Ozone, Tropospheric ozone, NOx and Air quality index. His research in Atmospheric sciences intersects with topics in Planetary boundary layer, Atmosphere, Atmospheric chemistry and Climate model. The various areas that he examines in his Atmosphere study include Environmental chemistry, Nitrogen dioxide and Plume.

His Ozone research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Climatology, Stratosphere and Troposphere. The study incorporates disciplines such as Photodissociation, Photochemistry and Aerosol in addition to NOx. Air quality index is a primary field of his research addressed under Meteorology.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study (171 citations)
  • Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California (131 citations)
  • Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions (125 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Meteorology
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Oxygen

David D. Parrish mainly investigates Atmospheric sciences, Meteorology, Ozone, Hydrology and Air quality index. David D. Parrish studies Troposphere which is a part of Atmospheric sciences. His Meteorology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Clean Air Act and Environmental protection.

His Ozone research integrates issues from Middle latitudes, Stratosphere, Climatology and NOx. David D. Parrish has researched NOx in several fields, including Environmental chemistry and Sea salt. His Air quality index research incorporates elements of Daytime and Aerosol.

Best Publications

  • Ozone production in the rural troposphere and the implications for regional and global ozone distributions

    S. C. Liu;M. Trainer;F. C. Fehsenfeld;D. D. Parrish

  • Ozone precursor relationships in the ambient atmosphere

    W. L. Chameides;F. Fehsenfeld;M. O. Rodgers;C. Cardelino

  • Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality

    P.S. Monks;Claire Granier;Claire Granier;Claire Granier;S. Fuzzi;A. Stohl

  • Models and observations of the impact of natural hydrocarbons on rural ozone

    M. Trainer;E. J. Williams;D. D. Parrish;M. P. Buhr

  • Global Distribution and Trends of Tropospheric Ozone: An Observation-Based Review

    O. R. Cooper;D. D. Parrish;J. Ziemke;M. Cupeiro

  • Correlation of ozone with NOy in photochemically aged air

    M. Trainer;D. D. Parrish;M. P. Buhr;R. B. Norton

  • Increasing springtime ozone mixing ratios in the free troposphere over western North America

    O. R. Cooper;O. R. Cooper;D. D. Parrish;A. Stohl;M. Trainer

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report:Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends

    P. J. Young;V. Naik;A. M. Fiore;A. M. Fiore;A. Gaudel;A. Gaudel

  • Indications of photochemical histories of Pacific air masses from measurements of atmospheric trace species at Point Arena, California

    D. D. Parrish;C. J. Hahn;E. J. Williams;R. B. Norton

  • Export of north american ozone pollution to the north atlantic ocean.

    David D. Parrish;John S. Holloway;Michael Trainer;Paul C. Murphy

  • Transatlantic transport of pollution and its effects on surface ozone in Europe and North America

    Qinbin Li;Daniel J. Jacob;Isabelle Bey;Isabelle Bey;Paul I. Palmer

  • High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin

    Peter M. Edwards;Steven S. Brown;James M. Roberts;Ravan Ahmadov

  • Effect of petrochemical industrial emissions of reactive alkenes and NOx on tropospheric ozone formation in Houston, Texas

    T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;C. A. Brock;C. A. Brock

  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urban air: How chemistry affects the interpretation of positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis

    Bin Yuan;Min Shao;Joost de Gouw;Joost de Gouw;David D. Parrish

  • Impact of natural hydrocarbons on hydroxyl and peroxy radicals at a remote site

    M. Trainer;E. Y. Hsie;S. A. McKeen;R. Tallamraju

  • Relationships between ozone and carbon monoxide at surface sites in the North Atlantic region

    D. D. Parrish;M. Trainer;J. S. Holloway;J. E. Yee

  • Observations of Ozone Formation in Power Plant Plumes and Implications for Ozone Control Strategies

    T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;J. S. Holloway;J. S. Holloway;D. D. Parrish

  • Critical evaluation of US on-road vehicle emission inventories

    David D. Parrish

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Database and Metrics Data of Global Surface Ozone Observations

    Martin G. Schultz;Sabine Schröder;Olga Lyapina;Owen Cooper

  • Chemical data quantify Deepwater Horizon hydrocarbon flow rate and environmental distribution

    Thomas B. Ryerson;Richard Camilli;John D. Kessler;Elizabeth B. Kujawinski

  • Reduced emissions of CO2, NOx, and SO2 from U.S. power plants owing to switch from coal to natural gas with combined cycle technology

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;D. D. Parrish;G. J. Frost;G. J. Frost;M. Trainer

  • Determination of urban volatile organic compound emission ratios and comparison with an emissions database

    Carsten Warneke;Carsten Warneke;S. A. McKeen;J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;P. D. Goldan

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Holloway
John S. Holloway National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Fred C. Fehsenfeld
Fred C. Fehsenfeld Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Michael Trainer
Michael Trainer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gerhard Hübler
Gerhard Hübler University of Colorado Boulder
Owen R. Cooper
Owen R. Cooper Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
T. B. Ryerson
T. B. Ryerson Earth System Research Laboratory
J. A. Neuman
J. A. Neuman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gregory J. Frost
Gregory J. Frost National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career opportunities linked to sustainability, conservation, and policy advocacy. For those aiming to deepen their expertise or transition into leadership roles, advanced programs like eds to edd program offer specialized education paths that blend environmental topics with broader educational leadership skills.

Additionally, students interested in social aspects of environmental work might explore fully funded dsw programs online. These programs prepare graduates for impactful roles addressing communities’ social and environmental needs.

For flexibility and cost-conscious learners, an affordable online general studies degree can provide a versatile foundation with opportunities to tailor coursework towards environmental issues, making it easier to enter interdisciplinary fields.

If you're looking to start with less intensive commitments, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get might guide you in selecting programs that balance workload and interest, helping you build a pathway into environmental careers smoothly.

Best Scientists Citing David D. Parrish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles