World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
67
Citations
162655
World Ranking
2123
National Ranking
87

Eugene W. Myers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene W. Myers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eugene W. Myers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene W. Myers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Eugene W. Myers is affiliated with the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics in Germany. Their main field of study is Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a total of 94 publications. Within this field, the primary subfields they work in include Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Plant Science, and Immunology.

The scientist's research centers broadly on topics such as Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Chromosomal and Genetic Variations, and Genetic Diversity and Population Structure. Additional areas of focus include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, Protist Diversity and Phylogeny, Aquaculture Disease Management and Microbiota, as well as Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology.

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Eugene W. Myers include:

  • The complete sequence of a human genome, 2022, Science
  • MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio high fidelity reads, 2023, BMC Bioinformatics
  • Six reference-quality genomes reveal evolution of bat adaptations, 2020, Nature
  • The Earth BioGenome Project 2020: Starting the clock, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio High Fidelity reads, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Eugene W. Myers include Martin Pippel, Sylke Winkler, Giulio Formenti, Erich D. Jarvis, and Michael Hiller. The distribution of collaborations reflects a broad network within the molecular biology and genetics research community.

Publication venues where this scientist's work regularly appears include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and DNA Research. The scientist has contributed notably to each of these outlets with multiple publications.

In addition to research papers, Eugene W. Myers has published book content, including a contribution to "Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences," published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

    Stephen F. Altschul;Warren Gish;Webb C. Miller;Eugene W. Myers

  • Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors

    Marcel Margulies;Michael Egholm;William E Altman;Said Attiya

  • The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster

    M. D. Adams;S. E. Celniker;R. A. Holt;C. A. Evans

  • Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology

    SF Altschul;W Gish;W Miller;EW Myers

  • Optimal alignments in linear space.

    Eugene W. Myers;Webb Miller

  • A Whole-Genome Assembly of Drosophila

    Eugene W. Myers;Granger G. Sutton;Art L. Delcher;Ian M. Dew

  • An O ( ND ) difference algorithm and its variations

    Eugene W. Myers

  • Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy.

    Martin Weigert;Uwe Schmidt;Tobias Boothe;Andreas Müller

  • V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets

    Hanchuan Peng;Zongcai Ruan;Fuhui Long;Julie H Simpson

  • PILER: identification and classification of genomic repeats

    Robert C. Edgar;Eugene W. Myers

  • The fragment assembly string graph

    Eugene W. Myers

  • Human whole-genome shotgun sequencing.

    James L. Weber;Eugene W. Myers

  • Finishing a whole-genome shotgun: Release 3 of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome sequence

    Susan E Celniker;David A Wheeler;Brent Kronmiller;Joseph W Carlson

  • Combinatorial algorithms for DNA sequence assembly

    John D. Kececioglu;Eugene W. Myers

  • Toward Simplifying and Accurately Formulating Fragment Assembly

    Eugene W. Myers

  • Fast, accurate reconstruction of cell lineages from large-scale fluorescence microscopy data

    Fernando Amat;William Lemon;Daniel P Mossing;Katie McDole

  • Heterochromatic sequences in a Drosophila whole-genome shotgun assembly

    Roger A Hoskins;Christopher D Smith;Joseph W Carlson;A Bernardo Carvalho

  • A File Comparison Program

    Webb Miller;Eugene W. Myers

  • Adaptive light-sheet microscopy for long-term, high-resolution imaging in living organisms

    Loïc A Royer;William C Lemon;Raghav K Chhetri;Yinan Wan

  • Efficient Bayesian-based multiview deconvolution

    Stephan Preibisch;Fernando Amat;Evangelia Stamataki;Mihail Sarov

  • Whole-genome shotgun assembly and comparison of human genome assemblies

    Sorin Istrail;Granger G. Sutton;Liliana Florea;Aaron L. Halpern

  • ClearVolume: open-source live 3D visualization for light-sheet microscopy

    Loic A Royer;Martin Weigert;Ulrik Günther;Ulrik Günther;Nicola Maghelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Hanchuan Peng
Hanchuan Peng Southeast University
Martin Weigert
Martin Weigert University of Chicago
Granger G. Sutton
Granger G. Sutton J. Craig Venter Institute
Knut Reinert
Knut Reinert Freie Universität Berlin
J. Craig Venter
J. Craig Venter J. Craig Venter Institute
Erich D. Jarvis
Erich D. Jarvis Rockefeller University
Arthur L. Delcher
Arthur L. Delcher University of Maryland, College Park
Karel Svoboda
Karel Svoboda Allen Institute
Daniel H. Huson
Daniel H. Huson University of Tübingen
Webb Miller
Webb Miller Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Computer Science, there are a variety of online degree programs and certification pathways that can help boost your career prospects. If you’re exploring broader scientific studies, check out online physics degrees that offer flexible schedules and affordable tuition, making science education more accessible than ever.

The data science learning path is another excellent choice for computer science enthusiasts, opening doors in fields like analytics, AI, and machine learning. For those wishing to specialize, pursuing an online master’s in electrical engineering degree can be invaluable, especially for roles that require a deeper engineering background.

If you’re looking for a faster entrance into the tech workforce, there are also easy certifications to get online that allow you to build in-demand skills without a lengthy degree program. Whatever your goals, these online options offer a flexible and convenient way to expand your knowledge and advance your tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene W. Myers

Trending Scientists