World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
73
Citations
20418
World Ranking
1413
National Ranking
602

Stuart A. McKeen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart A. McKeen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 247 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stuart A. McKeen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart A. McKeen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart A. McKeen is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on Atmospheric Science and related subfields.

The scientist's work concentrates on atmospheric chemistry, aerosols, and environmental gas dynamics, encompassing topics such as atmospheric ozone, air quality and health impacts, as well as the effects of fires on ecosystems and vehicle emissions. This diverse topical coverage reflects a comprehensive approach to studying atmospheric processes and their implications.

McKeen's recent publications include:

  • Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry, published in 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Criteria pollutant impacts of volatile chemical products informed by near-field modelling, published in 2020 in Nature Sustainability
  • Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires, published in 2022 in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Quantifying Methane and Ozone Precursor Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Regions across the Contiguous US, published in 2021 in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Aerosols from anthropogenic and biogenic sources and their interactions - modeling aerosol formation, optical properties, and impacts over the central Amazon basin, published in 2021 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McKeen include:

  • Ravan Ahmadov
  • Li Zhang
  • J. B. Gilman
  • Jeff Peischl
  • C. Warneke

The most common venues for McKeen's publications are:

  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Sustainability

Best Publications

  • Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model

    Georg A. Grell;Steven E. Peckham;Rainer Schmitz;Stuart A. McKeen

  • Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions.

    Brian C. McDonald;Brian C. McDonald;Joost A. De Gouw;Joost A. De Gouw;Jessica B. Gilman;Shantanu H. Jathar

  • Hydrogen Radicals, Nitrogen Radicals, and the Production of O3 in the Upper Troposphere

    P. O. Wennberg;T. F. Hanisco;L. Jaeglé;D. J. Jacob

  • High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin

    Peter M. Edwards;Steven S. Brown;James M. Roberts;Ravan Ahmadov

  • Impact of natural hydrocarbons on hydroxyl and peroxy radicals at a remote site

    M. Trainer;E. Y. Hsie;S. A. McKeen;R. Tallamraju

  • Potential impact of iodine on tropospheric levels of ozone and other critical oxidants

    D. Davis;J. Crawford;S. Liu;S. McKeen

  • Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry.

    Matthew M Coggon;Matthew M Coggon;Georgios I Gkatzelis;Georgios I Gkatzelis;Brian C McDonald;Jessica B Gilman

  • A volatility basis set model for summertime secondary organic aerosols over the eastern United States in 2006

    R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov;S. A. McKeen;S. A. McKeen;A. L. Robinson;R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini

  • Determination of urban volatile organic compound emission ratios and comparison with an emissions database

    Carsten Warneke;Carsten Warneke;S. A. McKeen;J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;P. D. Goldan

  • Hydrocarbon ratios and photochemical history of air masses

    S. A. McKeen;S. C. Liu

  • Satellite-observed U.S. power plant NOx emission reductions and their impact on air quality

    S.-W. Kim;S.-W. Kim;A. Heckel;S. A. McKeen;S. A. McKeen;G. J. Frost;G. J. Frost

  • Effects of changing power plant NOx emissions on ozone in the eastern United States: Proof of concept

    G. J. Frost;G. J. Frost;S. A. McKeen;S. A. McKeen;M. Trainer;T. B. Ryerson

  • The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study

    T. B. Ryerson;A. E. Andrews;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;T. S. Bates

  • Assessment of an ensemble of seven real-time ozone forecasts over eastern North America during the summer of 2004

    S. McKeen;S. McKeen;J. Wilczak;G. Grell;G. Grell;I. Djalalova

  • Emission ratios of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds in northern mid‐latitude megacities: Observations versus emission inventories in Los Angeles and Paris

    Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman;W. C. Kuster;W. C. Kuster;N. Grand

  • International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT): North America to Europe—Overview of the 2004 summer field study

    Fred C. Fehsenfeld;Gérard Ancellet;Timothy S. Bates;A. H. Goldstein

  • Emissions lifetimes and ozone formation in power plant plumes

    T. B. Ryerson;M. P. Buhr;G. J. Frost;P. D. Goldan

  • Effect of anthropogenic aerosols on biologically active ultraviolet radiation

    S. C. Liu;S. A. McKeen;S. Madronich

  • The photochemistry of acetone in the upper troposphere: A source of odd-hydrogen radicals

    S. A. McKeen;T. Gierczak;J. B. Burkholder;P. O. Wennberg

  • Ozone production from Canadian wildfires during June and July of 1995

    S. A. McKeen;S. A. McKeen;G. Wotawa;D. D. Parrish;J. S. Holloway;J. S. Holloway

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Trainer
Michael Trainer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gregory J. Frost
Gregory J. Frost National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ravan Ahmadov
Ravan Ahmadov National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Georg A. Grell
Georg A. Grell National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
John S. Holloway
John S. Holloway National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Si-Wan Kim
Si-Wan Kim Yonsei University
Wayne M. Angevine
Wayne M. Angevine University of Colorado Boulder
Jerome Brioude
Jerome Brioude University of La Réunion

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences can lead to diverse career paths, often supported by related online degrees that enhance your knowledge and job prospects. For those interested in broadening their foundation, an online general studies degree affordable offers flexible options to customize coursework while keeping costs low.

For students aiming to develop specialized expertise in earth sciences, pursuing a geology online degree is an excellent way to dive deep into topics like mineralogy, tectonics, and environmental geology, all essential for numerous roles in conservation and industry.

When considering advanced career opportunities, the cheapest dsw program highlights how social aspects intersect with environmental challenges, especially in community-focused roles addressing sustainability and environmental justice.

Additionally, for those seeking a streamlined educational experience, the easiest bachelor degree to get can provide alternative pathways, accommodating learners balancing multiple commitments while still entering the environmental field.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart A. McKeen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles