World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
9323
World Ranking
7331
National Ranking
3167

David M. Eagleman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Eagleman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David M. Eagleman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Eagleman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

David M. Eagleman is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their primary research field is Neuroscience, with substantial contributions across several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research focuses on a variety of topics, notably:

  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Recent publications authored or co-authored by David M. Eagleman include:

  • "What is the relationship between Aphantasia, Synaesthesia and Autism?" (2021), published in Consciousness and Cognition
  • "Deciphering Sounds Through Patterns of Vibration on the Skin" (2021), published in Neuroscience
  • "The future of sensory substitution, addition, and expansion via haptic devices" (2023), published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies" (2021), published in Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • JMIRx Med
  • Consciousness and Cognition
  • Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Michael V. Perrotta
  • Izzy Kohler
  • Huy Q. Phi
  • Benjamin Flores
  • Yael Katz

In recognition of their work, David M. Eagleman was named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness.

    David M. Eagleman;Terrence J. Sejnowski;Terrence J. Sejnowski

  • Human time perception and its illusions

    David M Eagleman

  • A standardized test battery for the study of synesthesia

    David M. Eagleman;Arielle D. Kagan;Arielle D. Kagan;Stephanie S. Nelson;Deepak Sagaram

  • Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively

    Xu Cui;Cameron B. Jeter;Dongni Yang;P. Read Montague

  • Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation

    Chess Stetson;Xu Cui;P. Read Montague;David M. Eagleman;David M. Eagleman

  • Wednesday Is Indigo Blue: Discovering the Brain of Synesthesia

    Richard E. Cytowic;David M. Eagleman

  • Visual illusions and neurobiology

    David M. Eagleman

  • The effect of predictability on subjective duration.

    Vani Pariyadath;David Eagleman

  • Is Subjective Duration a Signature of Coding Efficiency

    David Eagleman;Vani Pariyadath

  • Time and the brain: how subjective time relates to neural time.

    David M. Eagleman;Peter U. Tse;Dean Buonomano;Peter Janssen

  • Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain

    David Eagleman

  • Does Time Really Slow Down during a Frightening Event

    Chess Stetson;Matthew P. Fiesta;David M. Eagleman

  • Using space and time to encode vibrotactile information: toward an estimate of the skin’s achievable throughput

    Scott D. Novich;Scott D. Novich;David M. Eagleman;David M. Eagleman

  • Causality and the perception of time.

    David M. Eagleman;Alex O. Holcombe

  • Effects of Auditory Rhythm and Music on Gait Disturbances in Parkinson’s Disease

    Aidin Ashoori;David M. Eagleman;Joseph Jankovic

  • Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

    David M. Eagleman;Terrence J. Sejnowski

  • The objectification of overlearned sequences: A new view of spatial sequence synesthesia

    David M. Eagleman

  • Is synaesthesia one condition or many? A large-scale analysis reveals subgroups

    Scott Novich;Scott Novich;Sherry Cheng;David M. Eagleman

  • The genetics of colored sequence synesthesia: Suggestive evidence of linkage to 16q and genetic heterogeneity for the condition

    Steffie N. Tomson;Nili Avidan;Kwanghyuk Lee;Anand K. Sarma

  • Ready…Go: Amplitude of the fMRI Signal Encodes Expectation of Cue Arrival Time

    Xu Cui;Chess Stetson;P. Read Montague;David M. Eagleman

  • Subjective Duration as a Signature of Coding Efficiency : Emerging Links Among Stimulus Repetition, Predictive Coding, and Cortical GABA Levels

    William J. Matthews;Devin B. Terhune;Hedderik van Rijn;David M. Eagleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Terrence J. Sejnowski
Terrence J. Sejnowski Salk Institute for Biological Studies
P. Read Montague
P. Read Montague Virginia Tech
Ramiro Salas
Ramiro Salas Baylor College of Medicine
Suzanne M. Leal
Suzanne M. Leal Columbia University Medical Center
Jonathan Winawer
Jonathan Winawer New York University
Julia Simner
Julia Simner University of Sussex
Dianna M. Milewicz
Dianna M. Milewicz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Warren H. Meck
Warren H. Meck Duke University
Marc A. Sommer
Marc A. Sommer Duke University
Devin Blair Terhune
Devin Blair Terhune Goldsmiths University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open diverse pathways in neuroscience and related fields. Students interested in mental health and therapy often consider msw programs online, which focus on advanced social work practice, including clinical and community-based roles. For those aiming to specialize in behavior analysis, pursuing bcba master's programs online can prepare graduates for Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification, allowing work with individuals with behavioral or developmental challenges.

If you are looking to fast-track your studies, accelerated social work degree options offer a quicker route to the workforce, without sacrificing educational quality. Meanwhile, students keen on building a foundational understanding of human behavior in a shorter time frame may benefit from a 2-year psychology degree online. These programs provide flexibility and efficiency while supporting entry into roles in counseling, mental health, or graduate study in neuroscience.

Researching various online options ensures you find a program that matches your career goals, schedule, and budget, complementing your interests in neuroscience and its related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Eagleman

Trending Scientists