World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc O. Ernst

Marc O. Ernst

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
18001
World Ranking
6527
National Ranking
308

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
18533
World Ranking
6563
National Ranking
552

Marc O. Ernst publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc O. Ernst sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 308 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marc O. Ernst D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc O. Ernst sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc O. Ernst is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany and focuses primarily on Neuroscience with an emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Sensory Systems. Their research additionally spans Social Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Color perception and design

Recent publications by Marc O. Ernst demonstrate a range of focus within experimental psychology and sensory integration. Selected papers include:

  • "Advances in Experimental Psychology", 2021, published in Open Psychology
  • "Multisensory correlation computations in the human brain identified by a time-resolved encoding model", 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • "Adapting visualizations and interfaces to the user", 2022, published in it - Information Technology
  • "Development of multisensory integration following prolonged early-onset visual deprivation", 2021, published in Current Biology
  • "Survey on Haptic Feedback through Sensory Illusions in Interactive Systems", 2024, published in ACM Computing Surveys

Marc O. Ernst has collaborated multiple times with several co-authors, including:

  • Irene Senna
  • Timo Oess
  • Heiko Neumann
  • Cesare Parise
  • Priscilla Balestrucci

The scientist's frequent publication venues cover a variety of platforms related to life sciences, cognitive studies, and information technology. These include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Journal of Vision
  • eLife
  • it - Information Technology

Marc O. Ernst's body of work manifests an interdisciplinary approach across neuroscience and psychological sciences related to sensory perception and cognitive processes. Their collaborations, publication venues, and research topics highlight a comprehensive engagement within these scientific domains.

Best Publications

  • Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

    Marc O. Ernst;Marc O. Ernst;Martin S. Banks

  • Merging the senses into a robust percept

    Marc O. Ernst;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses

    J. M. Hillis;M. O. Ernst;M. S. Banks;M. S. Landy

  • Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior.

    Wendy J Adams;Erich W Graf;Marc O Ernst

  • The Rubber Hand Illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand.

    Marieke Rohde;Massimiliano Di Luca;Marc O. Ernst

  • Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch.

    Marc O. Ernst

  • The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching.

    Johannes Burge;Marc O. Ernst;Martin S. Banks

  • Focus cues affect perceived depth.

    Simon J. Watt;Kurt Akeley;Marc O. Ernst;Martin S. Banks

  • Touch can change visual slant perception

    Marc O. Ernst;Martin S. Banks;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch

    Hannah B. Helbig;Marc O. Ernst

  • Viewpoint Dependence in Visual and Haptic Object Recognition

    Fiona N. Newell;Marc O. Ernst;Bosco S. Tjan;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • A Bayesian view on multimodal cue integration

    Marc O. Ernst

  • Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands

    Marco Santello;Matteo Bianchi;Marco Gabiccini;Emiliano Ricciardi

  • Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing

    Cesare V. Parise;Katharina Knorre;Marc O. Ernst

  • Walking Straight into Circles

    Jan L. Souman;Ilja Frissen;Ilja Frissen;Manish N. Sreenivasa;Manish N. Sreenivasa;Marc O. Ernst

  • The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity

    Sergei Gepshtein;Johannes Burge;Marc O. Ernst;Martin S. Banks

  • When Correlation Implies Causation in Multisensory Integration

    Cesare V. Parise;Cesare V. Parise;Cesare V. Parise;Charles Spence;Marc O. Ernst;Marc O. Ernst

  • Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events.

    Jean-Pierre Bresciani;Franziska Dammeier;Marc O. Ernst

  • Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception.

    Jean-Pierre Bresciani;Marc O. Ernst;Knut Drewing;Guillaume Bouyer

  • Haptic Communications

    E. Steinbach;S. Hirche;M. Ernst;F. Brandi

  • Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: Cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency

    Massimiliano Di Luca;Tonja-Katrin Machulla;Marc O. Ernst

  • Perceived visual speed while walking: Adding to subtraction

    J. L. Souman;I. Frissen;Marc O. Ernst

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Heiko Neumann
Heiko Neumann University of Ulm
Antonio Bicchi
Antonio Bicchi Italian Institute of Technology
Martin Buss
Martin Buss Technical University of Munich
Fiona N. Newell
Fiona N. Newell Trinity College Dublin
Vincent Hayward
Vincent Hayward Sorbonne University
Emiliano Ricciardi
Emiliano Ricciardi IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Felix A. Wichmann
Felix A. Wichmann University of Tübingen
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Pietro Pietrini
Pietro Pietrini IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, there are multiple online education options and career routes you can explore. Many aspiring professionals seek specialized credentials, such as doctoral degrees. If you’re considering clinical practice, online Psy D programs provide flexible pathways to become a licensed psychologist without pausing your current career or relocating.

Those drawn to counseling or therapy careers may pursue licensure as a marriage and family therapist. The LMFT programs available online support accelerated learning, allowing you to enter the mental health field more quickly than traditional routes.

If you are seeking to enter the workforce rapidly, accelerated degree programs online make it possible to earn your qualifications in less time. This helps students switch careers or advance sooner.

When weighing your options, it can be helpful to consider future earning potential. You might want to review some of the top paying degrees to maximize your investment in education while working toward your neuroscience or allied health career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marc O. Ernst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles