World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
12347
World Ranking
3700
National Ranking
114

Eli Brenner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eli Brenner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 414 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eli Brenner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eli Brenner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eli Brenner is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and related subfields. Their research spans multiple areas including Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The primary research topics addressed by Brenner include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies

Brenner has published in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Experimental Brain Research
  • Perception
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Brenner are:

  • "Fast responses to stepping-target displacements when walking", 2020, The Journal of Physiology
  • "Tapping on a target: dealing with uncertainty about its position and motion", 2022, Experimental Brain Research
  • "Why some size illusions affect grip aperture", 2020, Experimental Brain Research
  • "Where do people look when walking up and down familiar staircases?", 2023, Journal of Vision
  • "Effects of ageing on responses to stepping-target displacements during walking", 2020, European Journal of Applied Physiology

Brenner has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Jeroen B. J. Smeets
  • Emily M. Crowe
  • Andrea Ghiani
  • David L. Mann
  • Frédéric Danion

The scope of Brenner's work incorporates experimental and theoretical approaches to understand sensorimotor integration and perceptual processes in human behavior. This includes investigating how humans visually perceive and physically interact with their environment, how motor responses are adapted based on sensory feedback, and how gaze behavior is coordinated during locomotion and manual task performance.

Best Publications

  • Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity.

    Jeroen B. J. Smeets;Eli Brenner

  • Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object

    Eli Brenner;Jeroen B. J. Smeets

  • Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position

    Eli Brenner;Jeroen B. J. Smeets

  • Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration

    Jeroen B. J. Smeets;John J. van den Dobbelsteen;Denise D. J. de Grave;Robert J. van Beers

  • Hitting moving targets Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target’s velocity

    E. Brenner;Jeroen B. J. Smeets;Marc H. E. de Lussanet

  • Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect.

    Eli Brenner;Jeroen B.J Smeets

  • Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.

    Jeroen B J Smeets;Eli Brenner;Denise D J de Grave;Raymond H Cuijpers

  • Perceived distance, shape and size.

    Eli Brenner;Wim J.M van Damme

  • Simultaneous colour constancy revisited: an analysis of viewing strategies

    Frans W. Cornelissen;Eli Brenner

  • On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics.

    Raymond H. Cuijpers;Jeroen B. J. Smeets;Eli Brenner

  • Independent movements of the digits in grasping

    Jeroen B. J. Smeets;Eli Brenner

  • The difference between the perception of absolute and relative motion: a reaction time study

    Jeroen B.J. Smeets;Eli Brenner

  • Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: can acceleration be used in interception?

    Anne Marie Brouwer;Eli Brenner;Jeroen B J Smeets

  • Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouse.

    Eli Brenner;Jeroen B J Smeets

  • Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading

    A. V. van den Berg;E. Brenner

  • The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target

    Margot M. Veerman;Eli Brenner;Jeroen B. J. Smeets

  • Flexibility in intercepting moving objects.

    Eli Brenner;Jeroen B. J. Smeets

  • Throwing darts: Timing is not the limiting factor

    Jeroen B. J. Smeets;Maarten A. Frens;Eli Brenner

  • Humans combine the optic flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading.

    A.V. Van Den Berg;E. Brenner

  • Continuous visual control of interception.

    Eli Brenner;Jeroen B.J. Smeets

  • Perception and Action Are Inseparable

    Jeroen B. J. Smeets;Eli Brenner

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeroen B. J. Smeets
Jeroen B. J. Smeets Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frans W. Cornelissen
Frans W. Cornelissen University Medical Center Groningen
Majid Mirmiran
Majid Mirmiran University of Isfahan
Pascal Mamassian
Pascal Mamassian École Normale Supérieure
Karl R. Gegenfurtner
Karl R. Gegenfurtner University of Giessen
Michael S. Landy
Michael S. Landy New York University
Maarten A. Frens
Maarten A. Frens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dirk Kerzel
Dirk Kerzel University of Geneva
Monica Gori
Monica Gori Italian Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Eli Brenner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles