World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geoffrey P. Bingham

Geoffrey P. Bingham

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
5382
World Ranking
8324
National Ranking
4441

Geoffrey P. Bingham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey P. Bingham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Geoffrey P. Bingham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey P. Bingham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey P. Bingham is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and specializes in neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their research covers several subfields including social psychology, biomedical engineering, ophthalmology, and computational mechanics.

The main topics addressed in their work include visual perception and processing mechanisms, motor control and adaptation, tactile and sensory interactions, action observation and synchronization, muscle activation and electromyography studies, multisensory perception and integration, and 3D surveying and cultural heritage.

Frequent publication venues for Bingham's work include Experimental Brain Research, Vision Research, Journal of Vision, Human Movement Science, and PLoS ONE. These venues reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research spanning neuroscience, motor control, and perceptual studies.

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Motor control and adaptation
  • Tactile and sensory interactions
  • Action observation and synchronization
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • 3D surveying and cultural heritage

Bingham's recent publications also illustrate the scope of their research interests and collaboration network. Notable papers include:

  • Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • The role of intentionality in the performance of a learned 90° bimanual rhythmic coordination during frequency scaling: data and model (2021, Experimental Brain Research)
  • A stratified process for the perception of objects: From optical transformations to 3D relief structure to 3D similarity structure to slant or aspect ratio (2020, Vision Research)
  • The effect of movement frequency on perceptual-motor learning of a novel bimanual coordination pattern (2022, Human Movement Science)
  • Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model (2021, Experimental Brain Research)

Their network of frequent co-authors includes researchers such as Xiaoye Michael Wang, Rachel A. Herth, Qin Zhu, Jing Pan, and Mats Lind, indicating ongoing collaborations that support interdisciplinary research efforts.

  • Xiaoye Michael Wang
  • Rachel A. Herth
  • Qin Zhu
  • Jing Pan
  • Mats Lind

Bingham's work integrates experimental and theoretical approaches to address complex questions related to perception, motor learning, and cognition. The breadth of topics combined with engagement in multiple fields of study illustrates the multifaceted nature of their scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements

    T. Iberall;G. Bingham;M. A. Arbib

  • The necessity of a perception–action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching.

    Geoffrey P. Bingham;Christopher C. Pagano

  • Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition.

    Geoffrey P. Bingham;Richard C. Schmidt;Lawrence D. Rosenblum

  • Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck☆

    Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • Kinematic Form and Scaling: Further Investigations on the Visual Perception of Lifted Weight

    Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • Hefting for a Maximum Distance Throw: A Smart Perceptual Mechanism*

    Geoffrey P. Bingham;R. C. Schmidt;Lawrence D. Rosenblum

  • Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments.

    Geoffrey P. Bingham;Arthur Bradley;Michael Bailey;Roy Vinner

  • Verbs contribute to the coherence of brief narratives: Reading related and unrelated sentence triples

    Karl Haberlandt;Geoffrey Bingham

  • Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements.

    Geoffrey P. Bingham;Richard C. Schmidt;Frank T. J. M. Zaal

  • Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability

    Frank T. J. M. Zaal;Geoffrey P. Bingham;Richard C. Schmidt

  • Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated.

    Christopher C. Pagano;Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • Human readiness to throw: the size–weight illusion is not an illusion when picking the best objects to throw

    Qin Zhu;Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination: stable perception leads to stable action

    Andrew D. Wilson;David R. Collins;Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • A Perceptually Driven Dynamical Model of Bimanual Rhythmic Movement (and Phase Perception)

    Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • Task dynamics and resource dynamics in the assembly of a coordinated rhythmic activity.

    Geoffrey P. Bingham;R. C. Schmidt;M. T. Turvey;Lawrence D. Rosenblum

  • Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight.

    Unknown

  • Monocular Egocentric Distance Information Generated by Head Movement

    Geoffrey P. Bingham;Michael G. Stassen

  • Trajectory forms as a source of information about events.

    Michael M. Muchisky;Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • The effect of frequency on the visual perception of relative phase and phase variability of two oscillating objects.

    G.P. Bingham;F.T.J.M. Zaal;J.A. Shull;D.R. Collins

  • Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback.

    G.P. Bingham;F.T.J.M. Zaal;D. Robin;J.A. Shull

  • Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.

    Geoffrey Bingham;Rachel Coats;Mark Mon-Williams

  • Calibrating reach distance to visual targets.

    Mark Arwyn Mon-Williams;Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • The use of time and trajectory forms as visual information about spatial scale in events

    Daniel S. Mcconnell;Michael M. Muchisky;Geoffrey P. Bingham

  • Learning To Perceive the Affordance for Long-Distance Throwing: Smart Mechanism or Function Learning?

    Qin Zhu;Geoffrey P. Bingham

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams University of Leeds
Lawrence D. Rosenblum
Lawrence D. Rosenblum University of California, Riverside
Randall D. Beer
Randall D. Beer Indiana University
J. Farley Norman
J. Farley Norman Western Kentucky University
James T. Todd
James T. Todd The Ohio State University
Ian G. Stanistreet
Ian G. Stanistreet University of Liverpool
Michael T. Turvey
Michael T. Turvey University of Connecticut
Kevin Shockley
Kevin Shockley University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to a variety of fulfilling career paths. Many students consider related professions, such as substance abuse counseling, which are in high demand across the United States. The pathways to becoming a counselor can vary by state and city, especially regarding education, supervised training, and certification requirements.

For example, those interested in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Dallas need to meet specific state guidelines and obtain the proper credentials. Likewise, Denver substance abuse counselor certification requirements emphasize licensure and training crucial to work in Colorado.

In cities like Detroit, prospective counselors must fulfill Detroit substance abuse counselors education requirements before entering the field. If you're hoping to work in North Carolina, understanding substance abuse counselor requirements in Durham can help you plan your academic path. Online degrees in psychology or counseling can provide foundational knowledge and flexibility, making them an ideal choice for working adults or those seeking a career shift in the behavioral health field.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey P. Bingham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles