World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geert J.P. Savelsbergh

Geert J.P. Savelsbergh

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3569 3291 179 172 393 12010

Geert J.P. Savelsbergh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Geert J.P. Savelsbergh between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geert J.P. Savelsbergh published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2004. 9 of the 454 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2004. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 31 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

454 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Geert J.P. Savelsbergh: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 6
1993 5
1994 5
1995 2
1996 4
1997 6
1998 13
1999 16
2000 9
2001 10
2002 13
2003 21
2004 31
2005 23
2006 14
2007 20
2008 15
2009 9
2010 30
2011 15
2012 14
2013 19
2014 16
2015 20
2016 15
2017 23
2018 14
2019 10
2020 12
2021 12
2022 7
2023 6
2024 7
2025 2
Total 454
Download as CSV

Geert J.P. Savelsbergh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert J.P. Savelsbergh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 391–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 393 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57 393
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Geert J.P. Savelsbergh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert J.P. Savelsbergh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Geert J.P. Savelsbergh is affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with specific focus on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine as well as Developmental and Educational Psychology. Further areas of study include Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers several main topics including:

  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Sports Analytics and Performance

Savelsbergh has contributed to the academic literature with papers published in multiple venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Human Movement Science
  • International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Geert J.P. Savelsbergh are:

  • "Accuracy of maturity prediction equations in individual elite male football players," 2020, Annals of Human Biology
  • "Inertial Sensor-Based Motion Tracking in Football with Movement Intensity Quantification," 2020, Sensors
  • "An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field," 2020, Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • "Assessment of Visual Function and Performance in Paralympic Judo for Athletes with Vision Impairment," 2021, Optometry and Vision Science
  • "Into the Eyes of the Referee: A Comparison of Elite and Sub-Elite Football Referees' On-Field Visual Search Behaviour when making Foul Judgements," 2022, International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • John van der Kamp
  • David L. Mann
  • Annemarie De Witte
  • Pim Koolwijk
  • S.I. de Vries

Best Publications

  • Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers

    Geert J.P. Savelsbergh;A. Mark Williams;John Van Der Kamp;Paul Ward

  • Anticipation and visual search behaviour in expert soccer goalkeepers

    Geert J. P. Savelsbergh;John Van der Kamp;A. Mark Williams;Paul Ward

  • Reflections on Mirror Therapy: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Mirror Visual Feedback on the Brain

    Frederik J A Deconinck;Ana R P Smorenburg;Alex Benham;Annick Ledebt

  • Children with cerebral palsy exhibit greater and more regular postural sway than typically developing children

    Stella F. Donker;Annick Ledebt;Melvyn Roerdink;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh

  • Ventral and dorsal system contributions to visual anticipation in fast ball sports.

    J. van der Kamp;F. Rivas;H. van Doorn;G.J.P. Savelsbergh

  • Quantification of in-season training load relative to match load in professional Dutch Eredivisie football players

    T.G.A. Stevens;C.J. de Ruiter;Jos Twisk;G.J.P. Savelsbergh

  • Shoot or don't shoot? Why police officers are more inclined to shoot when they are anxious

    Arne Nieuwenhuys;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh;Raôul R. D. Oudejans

  • Limited Coping Skills, Young Age, and High BMI Are Risk Factors for Injuries in Contemporary Dance: A 1-Year Prospective Study

    Diana van Winden;Diana van Winden;Rogier M. van Rijn;Geert J.P. Savelsbergh;Geert J.P. Savelsbergh;Raôul R.D. Oudejans;Raôul R.D. Oudejans

  • Motor learning in practice : a constraints-led approach

    Ian Renshaw;Keith Davids;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh

  • Creative Motor Actions As Emerging from Movement Variability.

    Dominic Orth;John van der Kamp;Daniel Memmert;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh

  • Multiple information sources in interceptive timing

    John van der Kamp;Geert Savelsbergh;Jeroen Smeets

  • Visual timing and adaptive behavior in a road-crossing simulation study

    Arenda F. te Velde;John van der Kamp;José A. Barela;Geert J.P. Savelsbergh;Geert J.P. Savelsbergh

  • Information in learning to co-ordinate and control movements: Is there a need for specificity of practice?

    Geert J.P. Savelsbergh;John Van Der Kamp

  • Measuring Acceleration and Deceleration in Soccer-Specific Movements Using a Local Position Measurement (LPM) System

    Tom G.A. Stevens;Cornelis J. de Ruiter;Cas van Niel;Roxanne van de Rhee

  • The effect of body orientation to gravity on early infant reaching.

    G. J. P. Savelsbergh;J. Van Der Kamp

  • Fetal handedness and head position preference: A developmental study

    J. I. P. De Vries;R. H. Wimmers;I. A. P. Ververs;Brian Hopkins

  • The visual guidance of catching

    G. J. P. Savelsbergh;G. J. P. Savelsbergh;H. T. A. Whiting;J. R. Pijpers;A. A. M. van Santvoord

  • Body-scaled ratio as a control parameter for prehension in 5- to 9-year-old children.

    John van der Kamp;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh;Walter E. Davis

  • Differences in Gait between Children with and Without Developmental Coordination Disorder

    Frederik J. A. Deconinck;Dirk De Clercq;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh;Rudy Van Coster

  • Time-to-contact

    Heiko Hecht;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh

Frequent Co-Authors

John van der Kamp
John van der Kamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Raôul R. D. Oudejans
Raôul R. D. Oudejans Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Matthieu Lenoir
Matthieu Lenoir Ghent University
Keith Davids
Keith Davids Sheffield Hallam University
Karl S. Rosengren
Karl S. Rosengren University of Wisconsin–Madison
Damian Farrow
Damian Farrow Victoria University
Carlo Schuengel
Carlo Schuengel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ian Renshaw
Ian Renshaw Queensland University of Technology
Frank C. Bakker
Frank C. Bakker Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
A. Mark Williams
A. Mark Williams University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring psychologists and counselors in the USA benefit from a variety of online degree options and accelerated pathways designed to fast-track their careers. These flexible and convenient programs make it easier to start working in the field sooner, especially for those who need to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Many states now offer specialized programs, such as Maryland accelerated counseling programs and Michigan accelerated counseling programs. These programs provide structured yet rapid progress toward licensure, often through online or hybrid coursework.

If you’re seeking the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Massachusetts, or are interested in exploring Minnesota accelerated counseling programs, you’ll find pathways tailored to various educational backgrounds. Many programs are designed to help you meet state licensure requirements efficiently, while emphasizing key skills needed in mental health and counseling professions.

Online degrees in psychology and counseling not only offer flexibility but also open diverse career opportunities, from clinical practice to community outreach and research roles.

Best Scientists Citing Geert J.P. Savelsbergh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles