World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
7463
World Ranking
6248
National Ranking
79

Theo Meert publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo Meert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 182 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Theo Meert D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo Meert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Theo Meert is affiliated with Janssen in Belgium. Their professional activities are centered within this institution, contributing to the scientific community through research and development initiatives.

Although detailed records of published papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not available, the scientist's ongoing work is connected to the pharmaceutical and biomedical research fields typically associated with Janssen's portfolio.

Theo Meert's profile does not list specific main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics, but their position at Janssen suggests involvement in applied research areas related to drug development, clinical studies, or medical sciences.

No awards or book publications have been documented for Theo Meert, and there is no record of frequent collaborations that are publicly detailed.

Best Publications

  • Systemic immune activation leads to neuroinflammation and sickness behavior in mice.

    Steven Biesmans;Theo F. Meert;Jan A. Bouwknecht;Paul D. Acton

  • Making sense of big data in health research: Towards an EU action plan

    Charles Auffray;Charles Auffray;Rudi Balling;Inês Barroso;László Bencze

  • The Role of Interleukin-6 in Nociception and Pain

    Unknown

  • Vesicular glutamate transporter VGLUT2 expression levels control quantal size and neuropathic pain.

    Diederik Moechars;Matthew C. Weston;Sandra Leo;Zsuzsanna Callaerts-Vegh

  • Novel Role for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Receptor-1 and Its Ligand VEGF-B in Motor Neuron Degeneration

    Koen Poesen;Diether Lambrechts;Philip Van Damme;Joke Dhondt

  • Mitochondrial abnormality in sensory, but not motor, axons in paclitaxel-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat.

    Wen Hua Xiao;Huaien Zheng;Felix Y. Zheng;Rony Nuydens

  • Sustained synchronized neuronal network activity in a human astrocyte co-culture system

    Jacobine Kuijlaars;Tutu Oyelami;Annick Diels;Jutta Rohrbacher

  • A preclinical comparison between different opioids: antinociceptive versus adverse effects.

    Theo F. Meert;Hilde A. Vermeirsch

  • A Comparison of the Antinociceptive and Adverse Effects of the μ-Opioid Agonist Morphine and the δ-Opioid Agonist SNC80

    Elizabeth L. Gallantine;Theo F. Meert

  • Tear Gasses CN, CR, and CS Are Potent Activators of the Human TRPA1 Receptor

    Bert Brône;Pieter J. Peeters;Roger Marrannes;Marc Mercken

  • Exploring the role of nociceptor-specific sodium channels in pain transmission using Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 knockout mice.

    Sandra Leo;Rudi D’Hooge;Theo Meert;Theo Meert

  • Potentiation of the Analgesic Properties of Fentanyl-like Opioids with α2-Adrenoceptor Agonists in Rats

    Unknown

  • The Fabry disease-associated lipid Lyso-Gb3 enhances voltage-gated calcium currents in sensory neurons and causes pain

    L. Choi;J. Vernon;O. Kopach;M.S. Minett

  • Preparation and physicochemical characterization of biodegradable nerve guides containing the nerve growth agent sabeluzole.

    Geert Verreck;Iksoo Chun;Yufu Li;Ram Kataria

  • Pharmacological profile of ritanserin: A very specific central serotonin S2‐antagonist

    Unknown

  • The effect of low-dose insulin on mechanical sensitivity and allodynia in type I diabetes neuropathy.

    Yves M.J.J. Hoybergs;Theo F. Meert

  • Differences in behavioural test battery performance between mice with hippocampal and cerebellar lesions.

    Hannelore Goddyn;Sandra Leo;Sandra Leo;Theo Meert;Theo Meert;Rudi D'Hooge

  • Asymptomatic small fiber neuropathy in diabetes mellitus: investigations with intraepidermal nerve fiber density, quantitative sensory testing and laser-evoked potentials.

    Michael Ragé;Nathalie Van Acker;Michiel W. M. Knaapen;Maarten Timmers

  • JNJ-20788560 [9-(8-Azabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-3-ylidene)-9H-xanthene-3-carboxylic Acid Diethylamide], a Selective Delta Opioid Receptor Agonist, Is a Potent and Efficacious Antihyperalgesic Agent That Does Not Produce Respiratory Depression, Pharmacologic Tolerance, or Physical Dependence

    Ellen E. Codd;John R. Carson;Raymond W. Colburn;Dennis J. Stone

  • The time course of CO2 laser-evoked responses and of skin nerve fibre markers after topical capsaicin in human volunteers

    Michael Ragé;Nathalie Van Acker;Paul Facer;Ravikiran Shenoy

  • Pre-treatment with capsaicin in a rat osteoarthritis model reduces the symptoms of pain and bone damage induced by monosodium iodoacetate.

    Karel-Martijn Kalff;Mohammed El Mouedden;Jan van Egmond;Jan Veening

  • A longitudinal study of sensory biomarkers of progression in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy using skin biopsies

    H. Narayanaswamy;P. Facer;V.P. Misra;M. Timmers

  • Bone cancer pain model in mice: evaluation of pain behavior, bone destruction and morphine sensitivity.

    Hilde Vermeirsch;Rony M. Nuydens;Philip L. Salmon;Theo F. Meert

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudi D'Hooge
Rudi D'Hooge KU Leuven
Diederik Moechars
Diederik Moechars Janssen (Belgium)
Léon Plaghki
Léon Plaghki Université Catholique de Louvain
Niels Hellings
Niels Hellings Hasselt University
Masabumi Shibuya
Masabumi Shibuya Jobu University
Xavier Langlois
Xavier Langlois AbbVie (Belgium)
Christoph Bock
Christoph Bock Austrian Academy of Sciences
Charles Auffray
Charles Auffray Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to diverse education and career routes, including flexible online options. For students seeking a fast track, an online accelerated bachelor's degree can help you earn your qualification more quickly—ideal if you want to jumpstart your career or pursue further studies sooner.

When it comes to career returns, many neuroscience graduates find their backgrounds valuable in fields tied to the highest paid degrees and highest paying jobs. Positions in healthcare, biotech, and research sectors often offer excellent earning potential and strong growth prospects.

Affordability is a top concern for many prospective students. Fortunately, there are best online colleges that accept fafsa, making it easier to finance your education with federal aid. This broadens access to high-quality online neuroscience and related degree programs.

Best Scientists Citing Theo Meert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles