World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
13365
World Ranking
4477
National Ranking
53

André Mouraux publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Mouraux sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 352 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

André Mouraux D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Mouraux sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

André Mouraux is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their research spans several fields with a focus on medicine and neuroscience, particularly in areas related to pain mechanisms and treatments as well as neural dynamics.

The main fields of study for Mouraux include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Their subfields of study further specify their research interests, encompassing:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Physiology
  • Neurology
  • Pharmacology
  • Sensory Systems

Mouraux's work addresses a variety of key topics such as:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Frequent publication venues for Mouraux's research include:

  • European Journal of Pain
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • PLoS ONE
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Collaborations are an important part of Mouraux's academic output, with frequent coauthors being:

  • Rolf-Detlef Treede
  • Andrea Truini
  • Ombretta Caspani
  • Luis García-Larrea
  • Arthur Courtin

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Human surrogate models of central sensitization: A critical review and practical guide" (2021), European Journal of Pain
  • "Mechanisms Linking Olfactory Impairment and Risk of Mortality" (2020), Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Challenges and opportunities in translational pain research - An opinion paper of the working group on translational pain research of the European pain federation (EFIC)" (2021), European Journal of Pain
  • "Early gamma-oscillations as correlate of localized nociceptive processing in primary sensorimotor cortex" (2020), Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Dynamics of the perception and EEG signals triggered by tonic warm and cool stimulation" (2020), PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • The pain matrix reloaded: a salience detection system for the body.

    Valéry Legrain;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Léon Plaghki;André Mouraux

  • From the neuromatrix to the pain matrix (and back).

    Gian Domenico Iannetti;André Mouraux

  • Tagging the Neuronal Entrainment to Beat and Meter

    Sylvie Nozaradan;Isabelle Peretz;Marcus Missal;André Mouraux

  • A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the "pain matrix".

    André Mouraux;Ana Diukova;Michael C. Lee;Michael C. Lee;Richard Geoffrey Wise

  • Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond

    André Mouraux;Gian Domenico Iannetti

  • Determinants of Laser-Evoked EEG Responses: Pain Perception or Stimulus Saliency?

    Gian Domenico Iannetti;Nicholas P Hughes;Michael C Lee;André Mouraux

  • Nociceptive laser-evoked brain potentials do not reflect nociceptive-specific neural activity.

    André Mouraux;Gian Domenico Iannetti

  • Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meter embedded in a musical rhythm.

    Sylvie Nozaradan;Isabelle Peretz;André Mouraux

  • Gamma-Band Oscillations in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex—A Direct and Obligatory Correlate of Subjective Pain Intensity

    Z G Zhang;L Hu;Y S Hung;André Mouraux

  • How do we selectively activate skin nociceptors with a high power infrared laser? Physiology and biophysics of laser stimulation.

    Léon Plaghki;André Mouraux

  • The search for pain biomarkers in the human brain.

    André Mouraux;Gian Domenico Iannetti

  • Beyond metaphor: contrasting mechanisms of social and physical pain

    Gian Domenico Iannetti;Tim V. Salomons;Massieh Moayedi;André Mouraux

  • Low intensity intra-epidermal electrical stimulation can activate Aδ-nociceptors selectively.

    André Mouraux;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Léon Plaghki

  • Non-phase locked electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to CO2 laser skin stimulations may reflect central interactions between A∂- and C-fibre afferent volleys

    André Mouraux;Jean-Michel Guerit;Léon Plaghki

  • Olfactory Function and Olfactory Bulb Volume in Patients with Postinfectious Olfactory Loss

    Philippe Rombaux;André Mouraux;Bernard Bertrand;Georges Nicolas

  • A novel approach for enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio and detecting automatically event-related potentials (ERPs) in single trials

    Li Hu;André Mouraux;Yong Hu;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Gian Domenico Iannetti

  • Primary sensory cortices contain distinguishable spatial patterns of activity for each sense

    M. Liang;André Mouraux;L. Hu;G.D. Iannetti

  • Characterizing the Cortical Activity through Which Pain Emerges from Nociception

    Michael C. Lee;André Mouraux;Gian Domenico Iannetti

  • Single-trial time–frequency analysis of electrocortical signals: Baseline correction and beyond

    Li Hu;P. Xiao;Zhiguo Zhang;André Mouraux

  • Diagnostic colours contribute to the early stages of scene categorization: Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence

    Valérie Goffaux;Corentin Jacques;André Mouraux;Aude Oliva

Frequent Co-Authors

Valéry Legrain
Valéry Legrain Université Catholique de Louvain
Léon Plaghki
Léon Plaghki Université Catholique de Louvain
Gian Domenico Iannetti
Gian Domenico Iannetti University College London
Li Hu
Li Hu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Meng Liang
Meng Liang Tianjin Medical University
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Isabelle Peretz
Isabelle Peretz University of Montreal
Julie Duque
Julie Duque Université Catholique de Louvain
Michel Verleysen
Michel Verleysen Université Catholique de Louvain
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open up a diverse array of career and academic opportunities in related fields. Many students interested in brain science pursue further study or employment in areas like psychology, therapy, and social work. Fortunately, there are several flexible online options available for those who want to expand their knowledge or start a new career.

For example, affordable online MFT programs are a popular choice for students who wish to become licensed marriage and family therapists, focusing on the impact of the brain and behavior on relationships. If your interest lies in understanding cognitive processes or mental health, the cheapest online master's in psychology programs offer cost-effective paths to advanced credentials.

For those at the undergraduate level, there are several cheapest online psychology degree options, enabling students to gain foundational knowledge that aligns closely with neuroscience principles. Additionally, social work is another complementary field, and those curious about this route can explore online master's in social work programs that balance accessibility with career growth.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities to leverage neuroscience knowledge into meaningful and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing André Mouraux

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles