World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
France
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
96
Citations
32368
World Ranking
741
National Ranking
4

Neuroscience

D-Index
96
Citations
32686
World Ranking
863
National Ranking
21

Bruno Rossion publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Rossion sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 484 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bruno Rossion D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Rossion sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award

Overview

Bruno Rossion is affiliated with the University of Lorraine in France and specializes primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their research contributions span multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, and Neurology.

The scientist's work focuses on several key topics within these fields. Major areas of study include Face Recognition and Perception, Neural dynamics and brain function, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Multisensory perception and integration, Visual perception and processing mechanisms, Face recognition and analysis, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Among Bruno Rossion's recent publications are:

  • Understanding human individuation of unfamiliar faces with oddball fast periodic visual stimulation and electroencephalography (2020, European Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Is human face recognition lateralized to the right hemisphere due to neural competition with left-lateralized visual word recognition? A critical review (2021, Brain Structure and Function)

These papers contribute to the understanding of human face recognition and neural processing mechanisms. Other frequently cited related works by collaborators or in the field include studies on harmonic amplitude summation for frequency-tagging analysis and face categorization in the human brain.

Bruno Rossion regularly publishes in a range of scientific venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cortex
  • Neuropsychologia
  • NeuroImage
  • Journal of Vision

Frequent co-authors in their research network include Jacques Jonas, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois, Corentin Jacques, Louis Maillard, and Angélique Volfart. These collaborations are evident from repeated joint publications and research projects.

The breadth of publications and collaborations highlights engagement with topics such as the neural underpinnings of face perception, visual word recognition lateralization, and brain stimulation techniques as investigated through methods like EEG and frequency-tagging. This body of work enhances understanding of cognitive and neural mechanisms in perception and brain connectivity.

Best Publications

  • The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

    Anthony Norcia;L. Gregory Appelbaum;Justin Michael Ales;Benoit Cottereau;Benoit Cottereau

  • Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set : the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition

    Bruno Rossion;Gilles Pourtois

  • The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain

    Bruno Rossion;Isabel Gauthier;Michael J Tarr;P Despland

  • Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex

    Bruno Rossion;Carrie A Joyce;Garrison W Cottrell;Michael J Tarr

  • A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing.

    Bruno Rossion;Roberto Caldara;Mohamed Seghier;Anne-Marie Schuller

  • Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170

    Bruno Rossion;Corentin Jacques

  • Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception

    Bruno Rossion

  • Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race

    Caroline Michel;Bruno Rossion;Jaehyun Han;Chan-Sup Chung

  • Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus

    Bruno Rossion;Laurence Dricot;Anne Devolder;Jean-Michel Bodart

  • How does the brain process upright and inverted faces

    Bruno Rossion;Isabel Gauthier

  • The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site

    Carrie Joyce;Bruno Rossion

  • Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect : an event-related potentials study

    Bruno Rossion;Jean-François Delvenne;D. Debatisse;Valérie Goffaux

  • Faces Are "Spatial"—Holistic Face Perception Is Supported by Low Spatial Frequencies

    Valérie Goffaux;Bruno Rossion

  • The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination

    Corentin Jacques;Olivier d'Arripe;Bruno Rossion

  • Rapid categorization of natural face images in the infant right hemisphere

    Adélaïde de Heering;Bruno Rossion

  • The N170 : understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain

    Bruno Rossion;Corentin Jacques

  • The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception

    Bruno Rossion

  • ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception.

    Bruno Rossion;Stéphanie Caharel

  • Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses

    Bruno Rossion;Bruno Rossion;Isabel Gauthier;Valérie Goffaux;Michael J Tarr

  • Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology

    Bruno Rossion

  • Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces

    Goedele Van Belle;Meike Ramon;Philippe Lefèvre;Bruno Rossion

Frequent Co-Authors

Corentin Jacques
Corentin Jacques Université Catholique de Louvain
Louis Maillard
Louis Maillard University of Lorraine
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University
Anthony M. Norcia
Anthony M. Norcia Stanford University
Roberto Caldara
Roberto Caldara University of Fribourg
Fang Jiang
Fang Jiang Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Bettina Sorger
Bettina Sorger Maastricht University
Raymond Bruyer
Raymond Bruyer Université Catholique de Louvain
Bart Boets
Bart Boets KU Leuven
Philippe G. Schyns
Philippe G. Schyns University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students consider online degrees for flexibility and accessibility while working or managing other commitments. However, when planning your educational journey, it’s crucial to understand that specific degree and licensing requirements vary significantly by state.

For example, the Minnesota minimum degree requirement for social workers is a Bachelor’s in Social Work (BSW), while additional licensing steps may be needed for clinical practice. Similarly, the Mississippi education requirements for social workers emphasize an accredited bachelor’s or master’s degree, depending on the type of licensure you seek.

The social worker degree requirements in Missouri and the social worker education requirements in Montana echo similar trends—higher-level positions often require a Master of Social Work (MSW) and sometimes supervised fieldwork. If you’re interested in a psychology or related online degree, consider how your program aligns with state-specific licensing and job market expectations.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Rossion

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles