World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9066 8468 130 123 149 8249
Neuroscience 37 8694 8032 103 97 149 8243

Raymond Bruyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raymond Bruyer between 1977 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raymond Bruyer published across 48 years, from 1977 to 2024, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2003. 2 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2003. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1977 2024

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raymond Bruyer: publications per year, 1977 to 2024
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 4
1981 5
1982 2
1983 3
1984 5
1985 6
1986 5
1987 4
1988 5
1989 5
1990 5
1991 7
1992 7
1993 4
1994 4
1995 4
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 8
2000 5
2001 3
2002 4
2003 10
2004 7
2005 7
2006 6
2007 3
2008 4
2009 4
2010 1
2011 4
2012 1
2013 0
2014 2
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 155
Download as CSV

Raymond Bruyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond Bruyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 149 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 149
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Raymond Bruyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond Bruyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 37
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Raymond Bruyer is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a particular emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in Bruyer's work include emotion and mood recognition, face recognition and perception, dementia and cognitive impairment research, neurological disease mechanisms and treatments, color perception and design, and face and expression recognition.

The academic output of this scientist comprises several papers published in the Open Journal of Psychiatry. These include:

  • The Ability to Visually Recognize Facial Emotions during the Initial Stages of Alzheimer's (2020, Open Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Rational and Continuous Measurement of the Emotional Decision Making in Visual Recognition of Facial Emotional Expressions with M.A.R.I.E.: First Half (2024, Open Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Rational and Continuous Measurement of Emotional-Fingerprint, Emotional-Quotient and Categorical vs Proportional Recognition of Facial Emotions with M.A.R.I.E., Second Half (2024, Open Journal of Psychiatry)

Frequent co-authors in Bruyer's collaborative research include Philippe Granato, Shreekumar Vinekar, Jean-Pierre Van Gansberghe, and Olivier Godefroy. These collaborations are reflected in multiple publications within the same journal.

The research questions addressed often intersect areas such as emotion and facial expression recognition and their implications in neurological conditions, particularly Alzheimer's disease and dementia-related cognitive impairments. The scientist's work contributes to understanding how emotional decision-making processes can be quantitatively assessed and linked to neurological health.

Best Publications

  • The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain

    Bruno Rossion;Isabel Gauthier;Michael J Tarr;P Despland

  • Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)?

    Raymond Bruyer;Marc Brysbaert

  • Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect : an event-related potentials study

    Bruno Rossion;Jean-François Delvenne;D. Debatisse;Valérie Goffaux

  • A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces

    Raymond Bruyer;Christian Laterre;Xavier Seron;Pierre Feyereisen

  • Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials

    Valéry Legrain;Jean-Michel Guérit;Raymond Bruyer;Léon Plaghki

  • Effect of familiarity on the processing of human faces.

    S Dubois;B Rossion;C Schiltz;J M Bodart

  • Categorical Perception of Happiness and Fear Facial Expressions: An ERP Study

    S. Campanella;P. Quinet;R. Bruyer;M. Crommelinck

  • Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study.

    Bruno Rossion;Salvatore Campanella;Carlos M. Gomez;A Delinte

  • Discrimination of emotional facial expressions in a visual oddball task: an ERP study.

    Salvatore Campanella;C Gaspard;Damien Debatisse;Raymond Bruyer

  • Cognitive Mediators of Age-Related Differences in Language Comprehension and Verbal Memory Performance

    Martial Van der Linden;Michel Hupet;Pierre Feyereisen;Marie-Anne Schelstraete

  • Does visual short‐term memory store bound features?

    Jean‐François Delvenne;Raymond Bruyer

  • Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: an account for categorical perception of familiar faces.

    Salvatore Campanella;Catherine Hanoteau;D Dépy;D Dépy;Bruno Rossion

  • Improved selective and divided spatial attention in early blind subjects.

    Olivier Collignon;Laurent Renier;Raymond Bruyer;Daï Tranduy

  • Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons.

    Boutheina Jemel;Michèle Pisani;Marco Calabria;Marc Crommelinck

  • Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study.

    Salvatore Campanella;Mandy Rossignol;Sandrine Mejias;Frédéric Joassin

  • Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component.

    Boutheina Jemel;Anne-Marie Schuller;Yasémine Cheref-Khan;Valérie Goffaux

  • Heterogeneity in the cognitive manifestations of prosopagnosia: The study of a group of single cases

    Myriam Schweich;Raymond Bruyer

  • Cross-modal interactions between human faces and voices involved in person recognition

    Frederic Joassin;Mauro Pesenti;Pierre Maurage;Emilie E. Verreckt

  • The Ponzo illusion with auditory substitution of vision in sighted and early-blind subjects.

    L. Renier;Cédric Laloyaux;O. Collignon;D. Tranduy

  • Nociceptive processing in the human brain of infrequent task-relevant and task-irrelevant noxious stimuli. A study with event-related potentials evoked by CO2 laser radiant heat stimuli.

    Valéry Legrain;Raymond Bruyer;Jean-Michel Guérit;Léon Plaghki

  • The Neuropsychology of Face Perception and Facial Expression

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Salvatore Campanella
Salvatore Campanella Université Libre de Bruxelles
Jean-Michel Guerit
Jean-Michel Guerit Université Catholique de Louvain
Xavier Seron
Xavier Seron Université Catholique de Louvain
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine
Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva
Léon Plaghki
Léon Plaghki Université Catholique de Louvain
Valéry Legrain
Valéry Legrain Université Catholique de Louvain
Pierre Maurage
Pierre Maurage Université Catholique de Louvain
Serge Brédart
Serge Brédart University of Liège
Mauro Pesenti
Mauro Pesenti Université Catholique de Louvain

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Neuroscience opens doors to diverse online degrees and specialized certifications. Students curious about earnings may want to explore what degrees make the most money. This can help you align your neuroscience studies with lucrative career options in healthcare, technology, and research.

Affordability is a top concern for many. If you want to study online and need financial support, review the list of online schools that accept fafsa. This will help you minimize debt and access quality education.

For those wanting to boost their credentials quickly, consider pursuing online certifications. Certifications in areas such as data analysis, psychology, or health sciences can complement your neuroscience major and improve job prospects.

If you're balancing work or family, you may prefer programs with lighter workloads. It's worth looking into easy bachelor degrees online that offer flexibility while still supporting your career goals in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond Bruyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles