World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 50 5736 5279 69 65 190 9480

Olivier Collignon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Olivier Collignon between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Olivier Collignon published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2025. 42 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2025. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 23 publications
2003 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Olivier Collignon: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 3
2008 5
2009 8
2010 11
2011 14
2012 9
2013 14
2014 8
2015 12
2016 13
2017 22
2018 21
2019 14
2020 16
2021 15
2022 14
2023 22
2024 19
2025 23
Total 273
Download as CSV

Olivier Collignon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Collignon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 190 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302 190
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Olivier Collignon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Collignon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425 50
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Olivier Collignon is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a strong focus on subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Social Psychology, and Sensory Systems.

The main topics addressed in their work include multisensory perception and integration, visual perception and processing mechanisms, tactile and sensory interactions, neural dynamics and brain function, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and neuroscience and music perception.

Collignon has published extensively in multiple venues, with frequent publications in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), the Journal of Neuroscience, Cortex, and the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams, 2020, Nature
  • Categorical representation from sound and sight in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex of sighted and blind, 2020, eLife
  • Shared Representation of Visual and Auditory Motion Directions in the Human Middle-Temporal Cortex, 2020, Current Biology
  • General Enhancement of Spatial Hearing in Congenitally Blind People, 2020, Psychological Science
  • Visual motion processing recruits regions selective for auditory motion in early deaf individuals, 2021, NeuroImage

Frequent coauthors who collaborate with Collignon include Roberto Bottini, Ceren Battal, Stefania Mattioni, André Mouraux, and Mohamed Rezk. Collaborative efforts with these researchers have yielded multiple publications and contributed to the interdisciplinary nature of Collignon's work.

Best Publications

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Audio-visual integration of emotion expression.

    Olivier Collignon;Simon Girard;Frederic Gosselin;Sylvain Roy

  • Cross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects.

    Olivier Collignon;Olivier Collignon;Patrice Voss;Maryse Lassonde;Franco Lepore

  • Functional specialization for auditory–spatial processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind humans

    Olivier Collignon;Gilles Vandewalle;Patrice Voss;Geneviève Albouy

  • Neuron-Specific Enolase as a Predictor of Death or Poor Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C and 36°C

    Pascal Stammet;Olivier Collignon;Christian Hassager;Matthew P. Wise

  • Auditory motion perception activates visual motion areas in early blind subjects.

    Colline Poirier;Olivier Collignon;C. Scheiber;Laurent Renier

  • Impact of blindness onset on the functional organization and the connectivity of the occipital cortex.

    Olivier Collignon;Olivier Collignon;Giulia Dormal;Giulia Dormal;Geneviève Albouy;Gilles Vandewalle

  • Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men

    Olivier Collignon;S Girard;Frédéric Gosselin;D Saint-Amour

  • Functional Cerebral Reorganization for Auditory Spatial Processing and Auditory Substitution of Vision in Early Blind Subjects

    Olivier Collignon;Maryse Lassonde;Franco Lepore;Danielle Bastien

  • Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision

    Laurent Renier;Olivier Collignon;Colline Poirier;Dai Tranduy

  • A Novel Immunoassay Using Recombinant Allergens Simplifies Peanut Allergy Diagnosis

    F. Codreanu;O. Collignon;O. Roitel;B. Thouvenot

  • Specific activation of the V5 brain area by auditory motion processing: an fMRI study.

    Colline Poirier;Olivier Collignon;Anne G. DeVolder;Laurent Renier

  • Improved selective and divided spatial attention in early blind subjects.

    Olivier Collignon;Laurent Renier;Raymond Bruyer;Daï Tranduy

  • Crossmodal plasticity in sensory loss.

    Johannes Frasnelli;Olivier Collignon;Patrice Voss;Franco Lepore

  • Odor localization and sniffing.

    Johannes Frasnelli;Genevieve Charbonneau;Olivier Collignon;Franco Lepore;Franco Lepore

  • Blue light stimulates cognitive brain activity in visually blind individuals

    Gilles Vandewalle;Olivier Collignon;Joseph T. Hull;Véronique Daneault

  • A panel of 4 microRNAs facilitates the prediction of left ventricular contractility after acute myocardial infarction.

    Yvan Devaux;Melanie Vausort;Gerry P. McCann;Dominic Kelly

  • Revisiting the adaptive and maladaptive effects of crossmodal plasticity.

    Benedetta Heimler;Nathan Weisz;Olivier Collignon

  • Reduced multisensory facilitation in persons with autism.

    Olivier Collignon;Olivier Collignon;Geneviève Charbonneau;Frédéric Peters;Marouane Nassim

  • The Ponzo illusion with auditory substitution of vision in sighted and early-blind subjects.

    L. Renier;Cédric Laloyaux;O. Collignon;D. Tranduy

  • The role of vision in the development of finger–number interactions: Finger-counting and finger-montring in blind children

    Virginie Crollen;Rachel Mahe;Olivier Collignon;Xavier Seron

Frequent Co-Authors

Franco Lepore
Franco Lepore University of Montreal
Geneviève Albouy
Geneviève Albouy University of Utah
Anne De Volder
Anne De Volder Université Catholique de Louvain
Maryse Lassonde
Maryse Lassonde University of Montreal
Gilles Vandewalle
Gilles Vandewalle University of Liège
Marie-Pascale Noël
Marie-Pascale Noël Université Catholique de Louvain
Johannes Frasnelli
Johannes Frasnelli Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Julien Doyon
Julien Doyon Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine
Laurent Mottron
Laurent Mottron University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers in health, research, and counseling. Students interested in supporting others can pursue an accelerated masters in social work to quickly enter the field of social services, mental health, or advocacy. These programs often allow you to complete your degree faster, saving both time and tuition costs.

Many future neuroscientists also consider an online accelerated psychology degree. These flexible options can provide essential foundations in behavioral science and mental health—skills relevant to neuroscience research and therapy careers.

Interested in counseling or therapy roles? Consider enrolling in one of the cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online for cost-effective, high-quality education. Alternatively, a masters in counseling can prepare you to work in schools, clinics, or private practice.

These online degree pathways offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for students to advance their careers in neuroscience-adjacent fields while managing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Collignon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles