World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
10552
World Ranking
4729
National Ranking
272

Johannes Frasnelli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Frasnelli sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 157 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Johannes Frasnelli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Frasnelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes Frasnelli is affiliated with the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and engineering, with a strong emphasis on sensory systems and biomedical engineering. Over time, they have contributed substantially across multiple subfields including nutrition and dietetics, neurology, and immunology and allergy.

The core topics explored in their work include olfactory and sensory function studies, advanced chemical sensor technologies, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, allergic rhinitis and sensitization, neurobiology and insect physiology research, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, and neurological disease mechanisms and treatments.

The scientist has published numerous articles in frequently visited venues such as Chemical Senses, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's & Dementia, Rhinology Journal, and the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. Notable recent publications include:

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis, 2020, Chemical Senses
  • Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Literature, 2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Post-viral effects of COVID-19 in the olfactory system and their implications, 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023, Rhinology Journal
  • Clinical Olfactory Working Group consensus statement on the treatment of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction, 2021, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Benoît Jobin, Benjamin Boller, Thomas Hummel, Alexander Wieck Fjældstad, and Iordanis Konstantinidis. These partnerships have contributed to advancing studies in sensory and neurological functions as well as biomedical applications.

Best Publications

  • Olfactory exposure to males, including men, causes stress and related analgesia in rodents.

    Robert E Sorge;Loren J Martin;Kelsey A Isbester;Susana G Sotocinal

  • Position Paper on Olfactory Dysfunction

    T Hummel;K L Whitcroft;P Andrews;A Altundag

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis.

    Valentina Parma;Kathrin Ohla;Maria G Veldhuizen;Masha Y Niv

  • Olfactory dysfunction and daily life

    Johannes Frasnelli;Thomas Hummel

  • Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Literature.

    Jie Mei;Christian Desrosiers;Johannes Frasnelli

  • Detection of presymptomatic Parkinson's disease: combining smell tests, transcranial sonography, and SPECT.

    Ulrike Sommer;Thomas Hummel;Katja Cormann;Antje Mueller

  • Recovery of olfactory function following closed head injury or infections of the upper respiratory tract.

    Jens Reden;Antje Mueller;Christian Mueller;Iordanis Konstantinidis

  • The effect of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease on olfaction: a meta-analysis.

    Shady Rahayel;Johannes Frasnelli;Sven Joubert

  • Effects of olfactory function, age, and gender on trigeminally mediated sensations: a study based on the lateralization of chemosensory stimuli

    Thomas Hummel;Thomas Futschik;Johannes Frasnelli;Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink

  • Post-viral effects of COVID-19 in the olfactory system and their implications.

    Michael S Xydakis;Mark W Albers;Eric H Holbrook;Dina M Lyon

  • Interactions between Olfaction and the Trigeminal System: What Can Be Learned from Olfactory Loss

    Johannes Frasnelli;Benno Schuster;Thomas Hummel

  • Recent smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 among individuals with recent respiratory symptoms.

    Richard C. Gerkin;Kathrin Ohla;Maria G. Veldhuizen;Paule V. Joseph

  • Brain activations during pain: a neuroimaging meta-analysis of patients with pain and healthy controls.

    Karin B. Jensen;Christina Regenbogen;Margarete C. Ohse;Johannes Frasnelli

  • Crossmodal plasticity in sensory loss.

    Johannes Frasnelli;Olivier Collignon;Patrice Voss;Franco Lepore

  • Odor localization and sniffing.

    Johannes Frasnelli;Genevieve Charbonneau;Olivier Collignon;Franco Lepore;Franco Lepore

  • The neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function—an ALE meta-analysis of human functional brain imaging data

    Jessica Albrecht;Rainer Kopietz;Johannes Frasnelli;Johannes Frasnelli;Martin Wiesmann

  • Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023.

    Unknown

  • Orbitofrontal Cortex and Olfactory Bulb Volume Predict Distinct Aspects of Olfactory Performance in Healthy Subjects

    Janina Seubert;Jessica Freiherr;Johannes Frasnelli;Thomas Hummel

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory performance

    Johannes Frasnelli;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Julie A. Boyle;Jelena Djordjevic

  • Clinical presentation of qualitative olfactory dysfunction

    J. Frasnelli;B. N. Landis;S. Heilmann;B. Hauswald

  • Cerebral Activation to Intranasal Chemosensory Trigeminal Stimulation

    Julie A. Boyle;Michael Heinke;Johannes Gerber;Johannes Frasnelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Johan N. Lundström
Johan N. Lundström Karolinska Institute
Basile Nicolas Landis
Basile Nicolas Landis University of Geneva
Franco Lepore
Franco Lepore University of Montreal
Olivier Collignon
Olivier Collignon Université Catholique de Louvain
Veronika Schöpf
Veronika Schöpf University of Graz
Antje Haehner
Antje Haehner TU Dresden
Moustafa Bensafi
Moustafa Bensafi Grenoble Alpes University
Marilyn Jones-Gotman
Marilyn Jones-Gotman Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Johannes Frasnelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles