World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antje Haehner

Antje Haehner

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 39 8300 7666 702 667 110 6635

Antje Haehner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antje Haehner between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antje Haehner published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 20 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications
2006 2025

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antje Haehner: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 4
2011 2
2012 3
2013 5
2014 1
2015 4
2016 5
2017 8
2018 10
2019 3
2020 8
2021 21
2022 16
2023 10
2024 12
2025 8
Total 131
Download as CSV

Antje Haehner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antje Haehner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 110 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 110
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Antje Haehner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antje Haehner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Antje Haehner is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Neuroscience, Engineering, and Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, notably Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering, Nutrition and Dietetics, Neurology, and Immunology and Allergy.

The primary focus of their research includes olfactory and sensory function studies, advanced chemical sensor technologies, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, allergic rhinitis and sensitization, migraine and headache studies, long-term effects of COVID-19, and essential oils with antimicrobial activity.

Haehner's recent scholarly output features several publications addressing olfactory dysfunction and its diagnostic and clinical implications. Among these are:

  • Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction as an Early Identifier of COVID-19 in Adults and Children: An International Multicenter Study (2020, Otolaryngology)
  • Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19 (2020, ORL)
  • Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023 (2023, Rhinology Journal)
  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction (2022, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology)
  • Olfactory Dysfunction Is Already Present with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Deepens with Disease Severity in the Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum (2020, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease)

They frequently publish in a core group of academic journals. These include:

  • Rhinology Journal
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
  • Scientific Reports
  • ORL
  • The Journal of Headache and Pain

The list of frequent collaborators shows a pattern of ongoing partnerships with researchers such as Thomas Hummel, Gudrun Goßrau, Katja de With, Julia Draf, and Anna Kristina Hernandez. These co-authorship networks reflect sustained scholarly cooperation over multiple projects.

Haehner's contributions encompass a substantial volume of publications especially in the sensory systems domain, addressing olfactory and gustatory functions and their implications for clinical diagnostics and biomedical engineering applications. Their work links sensory dysfunctions to conditions including COVID-19 and neurodegenerative diseases, illustrating interdisciplinary approaches utilizing engineering techniques within medical research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Position Paper on Olfactory Dysfunction

    T Hummel;K L Whitcroft;P Andrews;A Altundag

  • Prevalence of smell loss in Parkinson's disease--a multicenter study.

    A. Haehner;S. Boesveldt;H. W. Berendse;Alan Mackay-Sim

  • Olfactory loss may be a first sign of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

    Antje Haehner;Thomas Hummel;Cornelia Hummel;Ulrike Sommer

  • Olfactory Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

    Concepció Marin;Dolores Vilas;Cristóbal Langdon;Isam Alobid

  • High Test–Retest Reliability of the Extended Version of the “Sniffin’ Sticks” Test

    Antje Haehner;Anna-Maria Mayer;Basile Nicolas Landis;Irène Pournaras

  • Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction as an Early Identifier of COVID-19 in Adults and Children: An International Multicenter Study.

    Chenghao Qiu;Chong Cui;Charlotte Hautefort;Antje Haehner

  • Olfactory Training in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

    Antje Haehner;Clara Tosch;Martin Wolz;Lisa Klingelhoefer

  • Olfactory loss in Parkinson's disease.

    Antje Haehner;Thomas Hummel;Heinz Reichmann

  • Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19.

    Antje Haehner;Julia Draf;Sarah Dräger

  • Olfactory dysfunction as a diagnostic marker for Parkinson’s disease

    Antje Haehner;Thomas Hummel;Heinz Reichmann

  • Correlation of Olfactory Function With Changes in the Volume of the Human Olfactory Bulb

    Antje Haehner;Antje Rodewald;Johannes C. Gerber;Thomas Hummel

  • Patterns of olfactory impairment reflect underlying disease etiology

    Katherine L. Whitcroft;Mandy Cuevas;Antje Haehner;Thomas Hummel

  • A longitudinal study of olfactory function in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease

    Birgit Herting;Susann Schulze;Heinz Reichmann;Antje Haehner

  • Olfactory function in patients with postinfectious and posttraumatic smell disorders before and after treatment with vitamin A: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

    Jens Reden;Katja Lill;Thomas Zahnert Md;and Antje Haehner Md

  • Incidence of Parkinson's disease in a large patient cohort with idiopathic smell and taste loss.

    Antje Haehner;Carla Masala;Sophie Walter;Heinz Reichmann

  • Intranasal vitamin A is beneficial in post-infectious olfactory loss

    Thomas Hummel;Katherine L. Whitcroft;Katherine L. Whitcroft;Gina Rueter;Antje Haehner

  • Effects of analgesics on olfactory function and the perception of intranasal trigeminal stimuli.

    L Mizera;G Gossrau;T Hummel;A Haehner

  • Characteristics of chemosensory disorders—results from a survey

    Christos Merkonidis;Franz Grosse;Timomi Ninh;Cornelia Hummel

  • Post-infectious olfactory dysfunction exhibits a seasonal pattern

    I Konstantinidis;A Haehner;J Frasnelli;J Reden

  • Immunohistochemical, volumetric, and functional neuroimaging studies in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease

    T. Hummel;M. Witt;H. Reichmann;A. Welge-Luessen

  • Olfactory Function in Parkinson's Disease

    Antje Haehner;Thomas Hummel;Heinz Reichmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Ilona Croy
Ilona Croy Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Basile Nicolas Landis
Basile Nicolas Landis University of Geneva
Johannes Frasnelli
Johannes Frasnelli Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Agnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska University of Wrocław
Henk W. Berendse
Henk W. Berendse Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Peter Andrews
Peter Andrews University College London
Jörn Lötsch
Jörn Lötsch Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in studying Neuroscience grows, many students are seeking flexible options to start or advance their education. Choosing from accelerated programs online allows you to complete your degree faster and start your career sooner—ideal for those balancing work or family commitments.

Neuroscience can open doors to lucrative and rewarding professions. Exploring the best bachelor degrees can help you identify which related majors offer the highest earning potential. Likewise, reviewing the highest paying jobs in the field can inform your educational and career decisions.

Affordability is another key factor. To make neuroscience studies more accessible, consider the cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA. These institutions can help reduce student debt and provide a cost-effective path to completing your education.

Best Scientists Citing Antje Haehner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles