World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johan N. Lundström

Johan N. Lundström

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
8792
World Ranking
5155
National Ranking
101

Johan N. Lundström publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan N. Lundström sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Johan N. Lundström D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan N. Lundström sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johan N. Lundström is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, engaging in multidisciplinary research primarily situated at the intersection of neuroscience and engineering. The scientist's work focuses extensively on sensory systems, with a significant emphasis on olfactory and sensory function studies.

The research fields span several domains including:

  • Neuroscience
  • Engineering

Within these broad areas, subfields of study pursued include:

  • Sensory Systems
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Lundström's main topics of work center on:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The scientist has contributed to numerous publications, with research featured in journals such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Chemical Senses
  • Nature Communications
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Selected recent papers include:

  • "More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis" (2020), Chemical Senses
  • "Recent Smell Loss Is the Best Predictor of COVID-19 Among Individuals With Recent Respiratory Symptoms" (2020), Chemical Senses
  • "The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures" (2022), Current Biology
  • "Non-invasive recording from the human olfactory bulb" (2020), Nature Communications
  • "Relationship Between Odor Intensity Estimates and COVID-19 Prevalence Prediction in a Swedish Population" (2020), Chemical Senses

Frequent coauthors in Lundström's research collaborations include:

  • Artin Arshamian
  • Behzad Iravani
  • Moa G. Peter
  • Martin Schaefer
  • Thomas Hummel

Best Publications

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis.

    Valentina Parma;Kathrin Ohla;Maria G Veldhuizen;Masha Y Niv

  • Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment

    Marcus Hedblom;Bengt Gunnarsson;Behzad Iravani;Igor Knez

  • The Scent of Disease Human Body Odor Contains an Early Chemosensory Cue of Sickness

    Mats J. Olsson;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Bruce A. Kimball;Bruce A. Kimball;Amy R. Gordon;Amy R. Gordon

  • Central Processing of the Chemical Senses: An Overview

    Johan N. Lundström;Sanne Boesveldt;Sanne Boesveldt;Jessica Albrecht

  • Statistical localization of human olfactory cortex

    Janina Seubert;Jessica Freiherr;Jelena Djordjevic;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström

  • Identification of human gustatory cortex by activation likelihood estimation

    Maria G. Veldhuizen;Jessica Albrecht;Christina Zelano;Sanne Boesveldt

  • Functional Neuronal Processing of Body Odors Differs from that of Similar Common Odors

    Johan N. Lundström;Julie A. Boyle;Julie A. Boyle;Robert J. Zatorre;Robert J. Zatorre;Marilyn Jones-Gotman;Marilyn Jones-Gotman

  • Multisensory integration mechanisms during aging.

    Jessica Freiherr;Johan N Lundström;Johan N Lundström;Johan N Lundström;Ute Habel;Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz

  • Methods for building an inexpensive computer-controlled olfactometer for temporally-precise experiments

    Johan N. Lundström;Amy R. Gordon;Eva C. Alden;Sanne Boesveldt

  • Recent smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 among individuals with recent respiratory symptoms.

    Richard C. Gerkin;Kathrin Ohla;Maria G. Veldhuizen;Paule V. Joseph

  • Subthreshold amounts of social odorant affect mood, but not behavior, in heterosexual women when tested by a male, but not a female, experimenter.

    Johan N. Lundström;Mats J. Olsson

  • Gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in older adults: a national probability study.

    Sanne Boesveldt;Stacy Tessler Lindau;Martha K. McClintock;Thomas Hummel

  • Brain activations during pain: a neuroimaging meta-analysis of patients with pain and healthy controls.

    Karin B. Jensen;Christina Regenbogen;Margarete C. Ohse;Johannes Frasnelli

  • The Smell of Age: Perception and Discrimination of Body Odors of Different Ages

    Susanna D. Mitro;Susanna D. Mitro;Amy R. Gordon;Amy R. Gordon;Mats J. Olsson;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström

  • The neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function—an ALE meta-analysis of human functional brain imaging data

    Jessica Albrecht;Rainer Kopietz;Johannes Frasnelli;Johannes Frasnelli;Martin Wiesmann

  • Behavioral and neural correlates to multisensory detection of sick humans

    Christina Regenbogen;John Axelsson;Julie Lasselin;Julie Lasselin;Danja K. Porada

  • Orbitofrontal Cortex and Olfactory Bulb Volume Predict Distinct Aspects of Olfactory Performance in Healthy Subjects

    Janina Seubert;Jessica Freiherr;Johannes Frasnelli;Thomas Hummel

  • The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures

    Unknown

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory performance

    Johannes Frasnelli;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Johan N. Lundström;Julie A. Boyle;Jelena Djordjevic

  • Psychological effects of subthreshold exposure to the putative human pheromone 4,16-androstadien-3-one.

    Johan N Lundström;Miguel Gonçalves;Francisco Esteves;Mats J Olsson

  • The fish is bad: negative food odors elicit faster and more accurate reactions than other odors

    S. Boesveldt;J. Frasnelli;A.R. Gordon;J.N. Lundström;J.N. Lundström;J.N. Lundström

  • A rose by any other name: would it smell as sweet?

    Jelena Djordjevic;Johan N. Lundstrom;Francis Clément;Julie A. Boyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Mats Lekander
Mats Lekander Karolinska Institute
Johannes Frasnelli
Johannes Frasnelli Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
John Axelsson
John Axelsson Stockholm University
Donald A. Wilson
Donald A. Wilson Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Marilyn Jones-Gotman
Marilyn Jones-Gotman Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Eric Westman
Eric Westman Karolinska Institute
Regina M. Sullivan
Regina M. Sullivan New York University
Moustafa Bensafi
Moustafa Bensafi Grenoble Alpes University
Benoist Schaal
Benoist Schaal University of Burgundy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Johan N. Lundström

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles