World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
13046
World Ranking
3994
National Ranking
27

Noam Sobel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noam Sobel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Noam Sobel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noam Sobel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Noam Sobel is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and specializes primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their research focus encompasses several subfields, including Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering, Nutrition and Dietetics, Social Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics addressed in their work cover Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies, Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, and Action Observation and Synchronization.

The scientist has contributed extensively to academic literature, with notable recent papers including:

  • A measure of smell enables the creation of olfactory metamers, 2020, Nature
  • Relationship Between Odor Intensity Estimates and COVID-19 Prevalence Prediction in a Swedish Population, 2020, Chemical Senses
  • Olfactory sniffing signals consciousness in unresponsive patients with brain injuries, 2020, Nature
  • Proof of concept for real-time detection of SARS CoV-2 infection with an electronic nose, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Local Targeted Memory Reactivation in Human Sleep, 2020, Current Biology

Sobel's frequent co-authors include:

  • Reut Weissgross
  • Kobi Snitz
  • Aharon Ravia
  • Eva Mishor
  • Lior Gorodisky

Their publications appear most often in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Chemical Senses, Nature, Current Biology, and Science Advances.

Best Publications

  • Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction

    A.K. Anderson;K. Christoff;I. Stappen;D. Panitz

  • Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in the human olfactory cortex

    N. Sobel;V. Prabhakaran;J. E. Desmond;G. H. Glover

  • An Odor is Not Worth a Thousand Words: From Multidimensional Odors to Unidimensional Odor Objects

    Yaara Yeshurun;Noam Sobel

  • Predicting Odor Pleasantness from Odorant Structure: Pleasantness as a Reflection of the Physical World

    Rehan M. Khan;Chung-Hay Luk;Adeen Flinker;Amit Aggarwal

  • The sniff is part of the olfactory percept.

    Joel Mainland;Noam Sobel

  • Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans

    Jess Porter;Brent Craven;Rehan M Khan;Rehan M Khan;Shao-Ju Chang

  • Attentional modulation in human primary olfactory cortex.

    Christina Zelano;Moustafa Bensafi;Jess Porter;Joel Mainland

  • Time Course of Odorant-Induced Activation in the Human Primary Olfactory Cortex

    Noam Sobel;Vivek Prabhakaran;Zuo Zhao;John E. Desmond

  • Human Tears Contain a Chemosignal

    Shani Gelstein;Yaara Yeshurun;Liron Rozenkrantz;Sagit Shushan;Sagit Shushan

  • Olfactomotor activity during imagery mimics that during perception

    Moustafa Bensafi;Jessica Porter;Sandra Pouliot;Joel Mainland

  • Odorant-Induced and Sniff-Induced Activation in the Cerebellum of the Human

    Noam Sobel;Vivek Prabhakaran;Catherine A. Hartley;John E. Desmond

  • Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness

    Lee Sela;Noam Sobel

  • Humans can learn new information during sleep

    Anat Arzi;Limor Shedlesky;Mor Ben-Shaul;Khitam Nasser

  • Blind smell: brain activation induced by an undetected air-borne chemical.

    Noam Sobel;Vivek Prabhakaran;Catherine A. Hartley;John E. Desmond

  • Smelling a Single Component of Male Sweat Alters Levels of Cortisol in Women

    Claire Wyart;Wallace W. Webster;Jonathan H. Chen;Sarah R. Wilson

  • A metric for odorant comparison.

    Rafi Haddad;Rehan Khan;Yuji K Takahashi;Kensaku Mori

  • Hedonic-Specific Activity in Piriform Cortex During Odor Imagery Mimics That During Odor Perception

    Moustafa Bensafi;Noam Sobel;Rehan M Khan

  • Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell

    Jess Porter;Tarini Anand;Brad Johnson;Rehan M. Khan;Rehan M. Khan

  • Human non-olfactory cognition phase-locked with inhalation.

    Ofer Perl;Aharon Ravia;Mica Rubinson;Ami Eisen

  • An impairment in sniffing contributes to the olfactory impairment in Parkinson's disease.

    Noam Sobel;Moriah E. Thomason;Iris Stappen;Caroline M. Tanner

  • The world smells different to each nostril

    Noam Sobel;Rehan M. Khan;Amnon Saltman;Edith V. Sullivan

Frequent Co-Authors

Moustafa Bensafi
Moustafa Bensafi Grenoble Alpes University
Joel D. Mainland
Joel D. Mainland Monell Chemical Senses Center
Edith V. Sullivan
Edith V. Sullivan Stanford University
Johan N. Lundström
Johan N. Lundström Karolinska Institute
Gary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover Stanford University
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
David Harel
David Harel Weizmann Institute of Science
John E. Desmond
John E. Desmond Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Vivek Prabhakaran
Vivek Prabhakaran University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Noam Sobel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles