World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 62 3197 2943 34 32 225 17939

David Sander publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Sander between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Sander published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 34 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 16 publications
2003 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Sander: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 3
2005 7
2006 0
2007 6
2008 13
2009 9
2010 7
2011 11
2012 14
2013 20
2014 18
2015 15
2016 13
2017 15
2018 15
2019 12
2020 20
2021 27
2022 18
2023 17
2024 18
2025 16
Total 295
Download as CSV

David Sander publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Sander sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 225 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 225
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David Sander D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Sander sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 62
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Sander is a researcher affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland, with a focus on psychology and neuroscience. Their academic work spans across various subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and applied psychology.

The research conducted by David Sander often addresses several main topics, such as:

  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Relationships between changes in self-reported physical activity, sedentary behaviour and health during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in France and Switzerland" (2020), published in the Journal of Sports Sciences
  • "The rise of affectivism" (2021), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Evolution of physical activity habits after a context change: The case of COVID-19 lockdown" (2021), published in the British Journal of Health Psychology
  • "Early-Life Socioeconomic Circumstances and Physical Activity in Older Age: Women Pay the Price" (2022), published in Psychological Science
  • "Reward and emotion: an affective neuroscience approach" (2021), published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Boris Cheval
  • Matthieu P. Boisgontier
  • Silvio Maltagliati
  • Matthew W. Miller
  • Sylvain Delplanque

David Sander's work has been published in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Motivation Science
  • Affective Science
  • Cortex

Their significant presence in the fields of psychology and neuroscience reflects a research portfolio that integrates behavioral, cognitive, and emotional dimensions. Topics such as emotions and moral behavior and neural psychology are recurrent themes in their publications. The diversity of subfields and collaborative efforts also underscore a multidisciplinary approach.

Best Publications

  • The human amygdala: an evolved system for relevance detection.

    David Sander;Jordan Grafman;Tiziana Zalla

  • Electrophysiological Correlates of Rapid Spatial Orienting Towards Fearful Faces

    Gilles Pourtois;Didier Maurice Grandjean;David Sander;Patrik Vuilleumier

  • 2005 Special Issue: A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion

    David Sander;Didier Grandjean;Klaus R. Scherer

  • The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

    Raffael Kalisch;Dewleen G. Baker;Dewleen G. Baker;Ulrike Basten;Ulrike Basten;Marco P. Boks

  • The voices of wrath: brain responses to angry prosody in meaningless speech

    Didier Maurice Grandjean;David Sander;Gilles Pourtois;Sophie Schwartz

  • Emotion and attention interactions in social cognition: Brain regions involved in processing anger prosody

    David Sander;Didier Maurice Grandjean;Gilles Pourtois;Sophie Schwartz

  • Attentional Bias for Positive Emotional Stimuli: A Meta-Analytic Investigation

    Eva Pool;Tobias Brosch;Sylvain Delplanque;David Sander

  • Beyond Fear Rapid Spatial Orienting Toward Positive Emotional Stimuli

    Tobias Brosch;David Sander;Gilles Pourtois;Klaus R. Scherer

  • The perception and categorisation of emotional stimuli: A review

    Tobias Brosch;Gilles Pourtois;David Sander

  • The impact of emotion on perception, attention, memory, and decision-making

    Tobias Brosch;Klaus R. Scherer;Didier Maurice Grandjean;David Sander

  • That baby caught my eye. . . Attention capture by infant faces

    Tobias Brosch;David Sander;Klaus R. Scherer

  • Conscious emotional experience emerges as a function of multilevel, appraisal-driven response synchronization.

    Didier Maurice Grandjean;David Sander;Klaus R. Scherer

  • Relationships between changes in self-reported physical activity, sedentary behaviour and health during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in France and Switzerland.

    Boris Cheval;Hamsini Sivaramakrishnan;Silvio Maltagliati;Layan Fessler

  • Enhanced extrastriate visual response to bandpass spatial frequency filtered fearful faces: Time course and topographic evoked-potentials mapping

    Gilles Pourtois;E. S. Dan;Didier Maurice Grandjean;David Sander

  • Individual attachment style modulates human amygdala and striatum activation during social appraisal

    Pascal Vrticka;Frédéric Andersson;Didier Maurice Grandjean;David Sander

  • Interaction effects of perceived gaze direction and dynamic facial expression: Evidence for appraisal theories of emotion

    David Sander;Didier Grandjean;Susanne Kaiser;Thomas Wehrle

  • Mapping the Semantic Space for the Subjective Experience of Emotional Responses to Odors

    Christelle Chrea;Didier Maurice Grandjean;Sylvain Delplanque;Isabelle Cayeux

  • The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences

    David Sander;Klaus Rainer Scherer

  • Dissociable roles of the human somatosensory and superior temporal cortices for processing social face signals

    Gilles Pourtois;David Sander;Michael Andres;Didier Maurice Grandjean

  • The effect of appraisal level on processing of emotional prosody in meaningless speech.

    Dominik R. Bach;Didier Grandjean;David Sander;Marcus Herdener;Marcus Herdener

Frequent Co-Authors

Sylvain Delplanque
Sylvain Delplanque University of Geneva
Tobias Brosch
Tobias Brosch University of Geneva
Klaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer University of Geneva
Patrik Vuilleumier
Patrik Vuilleumier University of Geneva
Didier Maurice Grandjean
Didier Maurice Grandjean University of Geneva
Gilles Pourtois
Gilles Pourtois Ghent University
Boris Cheval
Boris Cheval École Normale Supérieure de Rennes
S. Craig Roberts
S. Craig Roberts University of Stirling
Annett Schirmer
Annett Schirmer University of Innsbruck
Aïna Chalabaev
Aïna Chalabaev Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields, especially online degrees in Social Work. Social work is a versatile discipline closely linked with psychology, often sharing similar foundational knowledge and career outcomes.

Many students interested in mental health and community well-being look at the best social work programs in Oklahoma for quality education and flexible online options. If you are considering studying on the East Coast, the best social work degree programs in Philadelphia offer a mix of accredited online and in-person pathways.

For those on the West Coast, the top social work programs in Portland are highly regarded for their innovative approaches, including distance learning. Students in the Mountain West may be interested in the best social work programs in Salt Lake City, which provide strong online learning communities and career support.

Choosing an online degree in a related field like social work can expand your career options in clinical services, counseling, and public health, complementing your psychology background.

Best Scientists Citing David Sander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles