World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6274 5835 54 52 109 20081

Julie Grèzes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julie Grèzes between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julie Grèzes published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2024. 19 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2024. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 6 publications
1997 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julie Grèzes: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 4
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 4
2004 2
2005 4
2006 6
2007 3
2008 8
2009 4
2010 6
2011 7
2012 6
2013 8
2014 5
2015 7
2016 4
2017 5
2018 1
2019 2
2020 8
2021 4
2022 4
2023 6
2024 13
2025 6
Total 135
Download as CSV

Julie Grèzes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Grèzes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 109
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julie Grèzes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Grèzes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Julie Grèzes is affiliated with the École Normale Supérieure in France and focuses on research in the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their work encompasses a range of topics within cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and experimental psychology.

The scientist's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Tracking historical changes in perceived trustworthiness in Western Europe using machine learning analyses of facial cues in paintings (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Rapid approach-avoidance responses to emotional displays reflect value-based decisions: Neural evidence from an EEG study (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Impact of total sleep deprivation and related mood changes on approach-avoidance decisions to threat-related facial displays (2021, SLEEP)
  • The 'Threat of Scream' paradigm: a tool for studying sustained physiological and subjective anxiety (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Whose emotion is it? Perspective matters to understand brain-body interactions in emotions (2023, NeuroImage)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Rocco Mennella
  • Emma Vilarem
  • Morgan Beaurenaut
  • Guillaume Dezecache
  • Lou Safra

Julie Grèzes has published often in several scientific venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • NeuroImage
  • Nature Communications
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • Cognition

Their main fields of study are:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

More specific subfields of their research include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Applied Psychology

Key topics in Julie Grèzes's work address:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Best Publications

  • Action Observation and Acquired Motor Skills: An fMRI Study with Expert Dancers

    B. Calvo-Merino;D.E. Glaser;J. Grèzes;R.E. Passingham

  • Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis.

    Julie Grèzes;Jean Decety

  • Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation

    Beatriz Calvo-Merino;Julie Grèzes;Daniel E. Glaser;Richard E. Passingham;Richard E. Passingham

  • Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy.

    J Decety;J Grèzes;N Costes;D Perani

  • Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions

    Jean Decety;Julie Grèzes

  • The power of simulation: imagining one's own and other's behavior.

    Jean Decety;Julie Grèzes

  • Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study

    Julie Grèzes;Jorge L. Armony;James B. Rowe;Richard E. Passingham;Richard E. Passingham

  • Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study.

    J Grèzes;J Decety

  • A PET Exploration of the Neural Mechanisms Involved in Reciprocal Imitation

    Jean Decety;Thierry Chaminade;Julie Grèzes;Andrew N. Meltzoff

  • TOP DOWN EFFECT OF STRATEGY ON THE PERCEPTION OF HUMAN BIOLOGICAL MOTION: A PET INVESTIGATION

    Julie Grèzes;Nicolas Costes;Jean Decety

  • Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing.

    J. Grèzes;M. Tucker;J. Armony;R. Ellis

  • Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions

    Julie Grèzes;Pierre Fonlupt;Bennett Bertenthal;Chantal Delon-Martin

  • Alexithymia in the interpersonal domain: A general deficit of empathy?

    Delphine Grynberg;Olivier Luminet;Olivier Corneille;Julie Grezes

  • Perceiving fear in dynamic body expressions.

    J. Grèzes;S. Pichon;B. de Gelder

  • Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study.

    Julie Grèzes;Christopher D. Frith;Richard E. Passingham;Richard E. Passingham

  • The effects of learning and intention on the neural network involved in the perception of meaningless actions.

    J Grèzes;N Costes;J Decety

  • Brain Mechanisms for Inferring Deceit in the Actions of Others

    Julie Grèzes;Chris Frith;Richard E. Passingham

  • Two different faces of threat : Comparing the neural systems for recognizing fear and anger in dynamic body expressions

    Swann Pichon;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Julie Grèzes

  • Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study.

    M.E. Kret;S. Pichon;S. Pichon;J. Grèzes;B. de Gelder;B. de Gelder

  • Brief Report: Selective Social Anhedonia in High Functioning Autism

    Coralie Chevallier;Julie Grèzes;Catherine Molesworth;Sylvie Berthoz

Frequent Co-Authors

Beatrice de Gelder
Beatrice de Gelder Maastricht University
Richard E. Passingham
Richard E. Passingham University of Oxford
Jean Decety
Jean Decety University of Chicago
Sylvie Berthoz
Sylvie Berthoz Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Jorge L. Armony
Jorge L. Armony McGill University
Alain Berthoz
Alain Berthoz Collège de France
Mariska E. Kret
Mariska E. Kret Leiden University
Johan Denollet
Johan Denollet Tilburg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA offers a variety of online pathways and career options. Many students choose to follow a counseling track, aiming for licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). It’s important to understand that licensure requirements differ by state and are often updated.

For instance, if you plan to practice in Indiana, you should review the lpc licensure requirements in Indiana to ensure your education and experience align with the state's standards. Likewise, those interested in practicing in Iowa need to know how to get an lpc license in Iowa, which may include specific supervised hours and exams.

Requirements can also vary in states like Kansas, so it’s vital to check the lpc license requirements in Kansas. In Kentucky, students should understand the Kentucky licensed professional counselor requirements before choosing a program.

Carefully researching your target state’s licensure criteria will help you select the right online psychology degree and pave the way for a rewarding career in counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Grèzes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles