World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Van den Stock

Jan Van den Stock

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
4896
World Ranking
9197
National Ranking
110

Jan Van den Stock publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Van den Stock sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jan Van den Stock D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Van den Stock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Van den Stock is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work focuses on several interconnected areas, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, and clinical psychology.

Their research addresses various specialized topics such as:

  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications
  • Face recognition and perception
  • Advanced MRI techniques and applications
  • Electroconvulsive therapy studies
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments

Jan Van den Stock has published in multiple well-known scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Brain
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Brain Communications
  • Cerebral Cortex

Notable recent papers illustrate the range and focus of the scientist's research. Examples include:

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders, 2020, Brain
  • Use of Multimodal Imaging and Clinical Biomarkers in Presymptomatic Carriers of C9orf72 Repeat Expansion, 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • Biophysical mechanisms of electroconvulsive therapy-induced volume expansion in the medial temporal lobe: A longitudinal in vivo human imaging study, 2021, Brain Stimulation
  • Clinical recognition of frontotemporal dementia with right anterior temporal predominance: A multicenter retrospective cohort study, 2024, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Lower regional gray matter volume in the absence of higher cortical amyloid burden in late-life depression, 2021, Scientific Reports

Collaboration plays a significant role in their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Mathieu Vandenbulcke
  • Louise Emsell
  • Filip Bouckaert
  • Maarten Laroy
  • Stefan Sunaert

The scientist's scholarly output reflects comprehensive investigations in neurological and psychiatric conditions using cutting-edge imaging and clinical biomarker methods, supported by a sustained publication record in leading journals. Their interdisciplinary expertise spans experimental and clinical domains, integrating advanced methodologies to explore brain function and pathology.

Best Publications

  • Body expressions influence recognition of emotions in the face and voice.

    Jan Van den Stock;Ruthger Righart;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions

    Beatrice de Gelder;Jan Van den Stock;Jan Van den Stock;Hanneke K.M. Meeren;Charlotte B.A. Sinke;Charlotte B.A. Sinke

  • Chemotherapy-induced structural changes in cerebral white matter and its correlation with impaired cognitive functioning in breast cancer patients

    Sabine Deprez;Frederic Amant;Refika Yigit;Kathleen Porke

  • Age at symptom onset and death and disease duration in genetic frontotemporal dementia: an international retrospective cohort study.

    Katrina M. Moore;Jennifer Nicholas;Murray Grossman;Corey T. McMillan

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders

    Simon Ducharme;Annemiek Dols;Robert Laforce;Emma Devenney

  • Intact navigation skills after bilateral loss of striate cortex

    Beatrice de Gelder;Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto;Geert van Boxtel;Rainer Goebel

  • Neural correlates of emotion-attention interactions : From perception, learning, and memory to social cognition, individual differences, and training interventions

    Florin Dolcos;Yuta Katsumi;Matthew Moore;Nick Berggren

  • Beyond the face: exploring rapid influences of context on face processing.

    Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Hanneke K M Meeren;Hanneke K M Meeren;Hanneke K M Meeren;Ruthger Righart;Jan van den Stock

  • Cortico-subcortical visual, somatosensory, and motor activations for perceiving dynamic whole-body emotional expressions with and without striate cortex (V1)

    Jan Van den Stock;Marco Tamietto;Bettina Sorger;Swann Pichon

  • Audiovisual emotion recognition in schizophrenia: Reduced integration of facial and vocal affect

    Unknown

  • Body expressions of emotion do not trigger fear contagion in autism spectrum disorder

    Nouchine Hadjikhani;Robert M. Joseph;Dara S. Manoach;Paulami Naik

  • Visual imagery influences brain responses to visual stimulation in bilateral cortical blindness.

    Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Marco Tamietto;Alan J. Pegna;Jan Van den Stock

  • No Association of Lower Hippocampal Volume With Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology in Late-Life Depression

    François-Laurent De Winter;Louise Emsell;Filip Bouckaert;Lene Claes

  • Neural Correlates of Perceiving Emotional Faces and Bodies in Developmental Prosopagnosia: An Event-Related fMRI-Study

    Jan Van den Stock;Jan Van den Stock;Wim A. C. van de Riet;Ruthger Righart;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Perceiving emotions from bodily expressions and multisensory integration of emotion cues in schizophrenia

    Jan Van den Stock;Sjakko J. de Jong;Paul P. G. Hodiamont;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Lateralization for dynamic facial expressions in human superior temporal sulcus

    François-Laurent De Winter;Qi Zhu;Jan Van den Stock;Koen Nelissen

  • Instrumental Music Influences Recognition of Emotional Body Language

    Jan Van den Stock;Jan Van den Stock;Isabelle Peretz;Julie Grèzes;Beatrice M.L. de Gelder;Beatrice M.L. de Gelder

  • Human and animal sounds influence recognition of body language.

    Jan Van den Stock;Julie Grèzes;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Use of Multimodal Imaging and Clinical Biomarkers in Presymptomatic Carriers of C9orf72 Repeat Expansion.

    Joke De Vocht;Jeroen Blommaert;Martijn Devrome;Ahmed Radwan

  • Affective scenes influence fear perception of individual body expressions

    Jan Van den Stock;Mathieu Vandenbulcke;Charlotte B.A. Sinke;Charlotte B.A. Sinke;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Neural correlates of body and face perception following bilateral destruction of the primary visual cortices

    Jan Van den Stock;Marco Tamietto;Minye Zhan;Armin Heinecke

  • Dissimilar processing of emotional facial expressions in human and monkey temporal cortex.

    Qi-Yong Zhu;Koen Nelissen;Jan Van den Stock;François-Laurent De Winter

  • Real Faces, Real Emotions: Perceiving Facial Expressions in Naturalistic Contexts of Voices, Bodies, and Scenes

    Beatrice de Gelder;Jan Van den Stock

Frequent Co-Authors

Beatrice de Gelder
Beatrice de Gelder Maastricht University
Marco Tamietto
Marco Tamietto University of Turin
Wim Vanduffel
Wim Vanduffel Harvard University
Alan J. Pegna
Alan J. Pegna University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of related disciplines and specialized paths. For those interested in advancing their expertise in mental health, consider exploring online psyd programs accredited by apa. These are ideal for students aiming to gain clinical skills and leadership roles in psychology.

Another rewarding option is to become a licensed marriage and family therapist. Flexible lmft online programs allow you to fast-track your journey toward licensure and support families and couples through evidence-based practices.

For students seeking to enter the workforce quickly, accelerated degree programs can reduce the time and cost required to earn your bachelor’s degree. This is especially valuable in fields like neuroscience, where timely entry to graduate studies or employment can be crucial.

Finally, exploring highest paying majors can help you make informed decisions about your academic and career path, ensuring both personal fulfillment and long-term financial stability as you plan your future.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Van den Stock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles