World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Argentina
2026
Award Badge
Psychology
Argentina
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5517 5126 3 3 166 6613
Neuroscience 51 5616 5164 9 8 171 6921

Adolfo M. García publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adolfo M. García between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adolfo M. García published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 14.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2025. 76 of the 298 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2025. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 41 publications
2005 2025

298 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adolfo M. García: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 2
2011 1
2012 2
2013 4
2014 9
2015 6
2016 22
2017 28
2018 27
2019 19
2020 31
2021 23
2022 27
2023 19
2024 35
2025 41
Total 298
Download as CSV

Adolfo M. García publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adolfo M. García sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 166 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 166
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Adolfo M. García D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adolfo M. García sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Argentina Leader Award

Overview

Adolfo M. García is affiliated with the University of San Andrés in Argentina and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Their work spans several key fields including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and neurology.

The scientist's research focuses on multiple interconnected topics such as neurobiology of language and bilingualism, dementia and cognitive impairment research, action observation and synchronization, functional brain connectivity studies, language development and disorders, autism spectrum disorder research, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Adolfo M. García include:

  • Agustín Ibáñez
  • Andrea Slachevsky
  • Agustina Birba
  • Sol Fittipaldi
  • Lucas Sedeño

Their publications appear primarily in well-established venues such as Alzheimer's & Dementia, NeuroImage, Cortex, Scientific Reports, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). The count of publications per venue highlights a concentration of work in Alzheimer's & Dementia with 18 papers, followed by NeuroImage and Cortex, each with 7 publications.

Recent scholarly articles authored or coauthored by García include:

  • "A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)," 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan," 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Interoception Primes Emotional Processing: Multimodal Evidence from Neurodegeneration," 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "A multidimensional and multi-feature framework for cardiac interoception," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "The Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat): Driving Multicentric Research and Implementation Science," 2021, Frontiers in Neurology

Best Publications

  • Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition.

    Sandra Baez;Daniel Flichtentrei;María Prats;Ricardo Mastandueno

  • Syntax, action verbs, action semantics, and object semantics in Parkinson's disease: Dissociability, progression, and executive influences.

    Yamile Bocanegra;Adolfo M. García;David Pineda;Omar Buriticá

  • Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

    Indira García-Cordero;Lucas Sedeño;Lucas Sedeño;Laura de la Fuente;Laura de la Fuente;Andrea Slachevsky

  • How language flows when movements don't: An automated analysis of spontaneous discourse in Parkinson's disease.

    Adolfo M. García;Adolfo M. García;Adolfo M. García;Facundo Carrillo;Juan Rafael Orozco-Arroyave;Natalia Trujillo

  • A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language.

    Adolfo Martín García;Agustin Mariano Ibañez

  • Attention, in and Out: Scalp-Level and Intracranial EEG Correlates of Interoception and Exteroception.

    Indira García-Cordero;Indira García-Cordero;Sol Esteves;Ezequiel P. Mikulan;Ezequiel P. Mikulan;Eugenia Hesse;Eugenia Hesse;Eugenia Hesse

  • Your perspective and my benefit: multiple lesion models of self-other integration strategies during social bargaining.

    Margherita Melloni;Margherita Melloni;Pablo Billeke;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Eugenia Hesse;Eugenia Hesse

  • Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan.

    Mario Alfredo Parra;Sandra Baez;Lucas Sedeño;Cecilia Gonzalez Campo

  • Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations

    Noelia Calvo;Adolfo M. García;Laura Manoiloff;Agustín Ibáñez

  • A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)

    Richard D. Morey;Michael P. Kaschak;Antonio M. Díez-Álamo;Antonio M. Díez-Álamo;Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg

  • Losing ground: Frontostriatal atrophy disrupts language embodiment in Parkinson's and Huntington's disease.

    Agustina Birba;Indira García-Cordero;Indira García-Cordero;Giselle Kozono;Agustina Legaz

  • Cortical dynamics and subcortical signatures of motor-language coupling in Parkinson’s disease

    Margherita Melloni;Lucas Sedeño;Eugenia Hesse;Indira García-Cordero

  • Unspeakable motion: Selective action-verb impairments in Parkinson's disease patients without mild cognitive impairment.

    Yamile Bocanegra;Adolfo M. García;Francisco Lopera;David Pineda

  • Interoception Primes Emotional Processing: Multimodal Evidence from Neurodegeneration.

    Paula C. Salamone;Paula C. Salamone;Paula C. Salamone;Agustina Legaz;Agustina Legaz;Agustina Legaz;Lucas Sedeño;Sebastián Moguilner

  • The inner world of overactive monitoring: neural markers of interoception in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    A. Yoris;A. M. García;L. Traiber;H. Santamaría-García

  • How embodied is action language? Neurological evidence from motor diseases

    Juan F. Cardona;Juan F. Cardona;Juan F. Cardona;Lucila Kargieman;Lucila Kargieman;Vladimiro Sinay;Oscar Gershanik;Oscar Gershanik

  • The Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat): Driving Multicentric Research and Implementation Science.

    Agustin Ibanez;Jennifer S Yokoyama;Katherine L Possin;Katherine L Possin;Diana Matallana

  • The Social Context Network Model in Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases.

    Sandra Baez;Adolfo M. García;Agustín Ibanez

  • Behavioral and Electrophysiological Correlates of Memory Binding Deficits in Patients at Different Risk Levels for Alzheimer’s Disease

    Marcos Pietto;Mario A. Parra;Natalia Trujillo;Facundo Flores

  • Parkinson's disease compromises the appraisal of action meanings evoked by naturalistic texts

    Adolfo M. García;Yamile Bocanegra;Elena Herrera;Leonardo Moreno

  • A lesion model of envy and Schadenfreude: legal, deservingness and moral dimensions as revealed by neurodegeneration.

    Hernando Santamaría-García;Sandra Baez;Pablo Reyes;José A Santamaría-García

  • Outcome-oriented moral evaluation in terrorists

    Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Eduar Herrera;Eduar Herrera;Eduar Herrera;Adolfo M. García;Adolfo M. García;Adolfo M. García;Facundo Manes;Facundo Manes;Facundo Manes

  • Language Deficits as a Preclinical Window into Parkinson's Disease: Evidence from Asymptomatic Parkin and Dardarin Mutation Carriers.

    Adolfo M. García;Lucas Sedeño;Natalia Trujillo;Yamile Bocanegra

Frequent Co-Authors

Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
Lucas Sedeño
Lucas Sedeño National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Facundo Manes
Facundo Manes Favaloro University
Sandra Baez
Sandra Baez Universidad de Los Andes
Mariano Sigman
Mariano Sigman Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
David Huepe
David Huepe Adolfo Ibáñez University
Tristan A. Bekinschtein
Tristan A. Bekinschtein University of Cambridge
Francisco Lopera
Francisco Lopera University of Antioquia
Juan Rafael Orozco-Arroyave
Juan Rafael Orozco-Arroyave University of Antioquia
Mario A. Parra
Mario A. Parra University of Strathclyde

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens up a range of education and job possibilities both within and outside the field. If you are looking for flexibility and speed, you might explore accelerated online degrees. These programs allow motivated students to complete their bachelor’s qualification faster, making it easier to enter the workforce or graduate programs sooner.

For those interested in strong earning potential, it’s worth knowing which are the highest paying degrees in the world and specific college majors that make the most money. Neuroscience is a versatile major that can lead to lucrative roles in biotechnology, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, or even data science with the right additional skills.

Affordability remains a key concern for many students. Fortunately, there are many accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, providing federally backed financial aid to eligible students. With the growth of online learning, it’s now easier than ever to find high-value programs that align with your interests and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Adolfo M. García

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles