World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
26947
World Ranking
2771
National Ranking
1597

Arthur M. Glenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur M. Glenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Arthur M. Glenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur M. Glenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arthur M. Glenberg is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research centers primarily on Psychology, encompassing subfields such as Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work addresses several core topics in cognitive and developmental science. These include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Parental Involvement in Education

Recent publications reflect a focus on language processing, sensorimotor grounding, and embodied cognition. Notable papers include:

  • "A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)" (2021), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Immediate sensorimotor grounding of novel concepts learned from language alone" (2020), Journal of Memory and Language
  • "The gleam-glum effect: /i:/ versus /λ/ phonemes generically carry emotional valence." (2021), Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • "Embodied Action Scaffolds Dialogic Reading" (2021), Educational Psychology Review
  • "Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper" (2023), Journal of Cognition

Frequent collaborators include:

  • M. Adelaida Restrepo
  • Ligia E. Gómez Franco
  • Erin Walker
  • Antonio M. Díez-Álamo
  • Tri Nguyen

Arthur M. Glenberg publishes in a range of journals with a recurrent presence in the following venues:

  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Psychological Research
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Educational Psychology Review

Best Publications

  • Grounding language in action

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Michael P. Kaschak

  • What memory is for.

    Arthur M. Glenberg

  • Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning

    Arthur M Glenberg;David A Robertson

  • Environmental context and human memory

    Steven M. Smith;Arthur Glenberg;Robert A. Bjork

  • Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension

    Arthur M Glenberg;Marion Meyer;Karen Lindem

  • Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models☆

    Arthur M Glenberg;William E Langston

  • Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg

  • Action-based language: a theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production.

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg;Vittorio Gallese;Vittorio Gallese

  • The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Alex Cherry Wilkinson;William Epstein

  • Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.

    Arthur M. Glenberg

  • Indexical understanding of instructions.

    Arthur M. Glenberg;David A. Robertson

  • Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Marc Sato;Luigi Cattaneo;Lucia Riggio

  • Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children's Reading Comprehension.

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Tiana Gutierrez;Joel R. Levin;Sandra Japuntich

  • Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Jennifer L. Schroeder;David A. Robertson

  • Cosmetic Use of Botulinum Toxin-A Affects Processing of Emotional Language

    David A. Havas;Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg;Karol A. Gutowski;Karol A. Gutowski;Mark J. Lucarelli

  • A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Naomi G. Swanson

  • Inexpert calibration of comprehension

    Arthur M. Glenberg;William Epstein

  • From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg;Jessica K. Witt;Janet Metcalfe

  • Calibration of comprehension.

    Arthur M. Glenberg;William Epstein

  • Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension

    Michael P Kaschak;Arthur M Glenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael P. Kaschak
Michael P. Kaschak Florida State University
Joel R. Levin
Joel R. Levin University of Arizona
Anna M. Borghi
Anna M. Borghi Sapienza University of Rome
Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
Steven M. Smith
Steven M. Smith Texas A&M University
Mike Rinck
Mike Rinck Radboud University
Richard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey Cardiff University
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Margaret M. Bradley
Margaret M. Bradley University of Florida
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA can open doors to various rewarding career pathways, especially in fields related to communication, counseling, and therapy. Many students interested in mental health or behavioral sciences find themselves drawn to allied professions such as speech-language pathology.

Those interested in working directly with individuals who have speech or language challenges often explore how to become a speech language pathologist in Missouri, as the process offers insight into the education and licensing steps required in that state. Similarly, those seeking opportunities across state lines will benefit from understanding Montana slp certification requirements, which detail the specific standards and exams needed for professional practice.

Career preparation also varies based on location. Exploring how to become a speech language pathologist in Nebraska can give students an overview of postgraduate expectations and supervised clinical practice. For those in the Western US, becoming a speech therapist in Nevada covers state-specific pathways and licensure.

Overall, Psychology graduates have a wide variety of related online degrees and career pathways to consider, with speech-language pathology standing out as a versatile and growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur M. Glenberg

Trending Scientists