World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9848 9217 434 420 90 5318

Diane Pecher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diane Pecher between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diane Pecher published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2011. 6 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2011. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1998 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diane Pecher: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 4
2005 9
2006 0
2007 2
2008 3
2009 6
2010 2
2011 10
2012 6
2013 5
2014 7
2015 5
2016 3
2017 3
2018 6
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
2024 3
2025 3
Total 95
Download as CSV

Diane Pecher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Pecher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 90
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Diane Pecher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Pecher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Diane Pecher is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands and focuses on research primarily within the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their work spans a number of subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Sensory Systems.

Their research addresses several key topics, notably Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Categorization, Perception, and Language, Action Observation and Synchronization, Child and Animal Learning Development, and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition.

Frequent publication venues for Diane Pecher include Memory & Cognition, Cognition, Cortex, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, and Journal of Cognition.

Recently published papers by Diane Pecher include:

  • Does multisensory study benefit memory for pictures and sounds? (2022, Cognition)
  • Encoding variability explains the multisensory benefit in recognition memory. (2023, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Diane Pecher are René Zeelenberg, Samuel J. A. van Zuijlen, Sharon Singh, Kevin Gunawan, and Mirthe E M van der Meijden.

Best Publications

  • Grounding cognition : the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking

    Diane Pecher;Rolf A. Zwaan

  • Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs

    Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing

    Saskia Van Dantzig;Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond

    Diane Pecher;Inge Boot;Saskia Van Dantzig

  • Revisiting Mental Simulation in Language Comprehension: Six Replication Attempts

    Rolf A. Zwaan;Diane Pecher

  • Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation

    Diane Pecher;Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • Mighty Metaphors: Behavioral and ERP Evidence that Power Shifts Attention on a Vertical Dimension.

    Kiki Zanolie;Saskia van Dantzig;Saskia van Dantzig;Inge Boot;Jasper Wijnen

  • Approach and avoidance as action effects

    Saskia van Dantzig;Diane Pecher;Rolf A. Zwaan

  • Evidence for long-term cross-language repetition priming in conceptual implicit memory tasks

    René Zeelenberg;René Zeelenberg;Diane Pecher

  • No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.

    Gino Camp;Diane Pecher;Henk G. Schmidt

  • Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task

    Inge Boot;Diane Pecher

  • Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation.

    Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • Oral approach-avoidance: affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics.

    Sascha Topolinski;Ira Theresa Maschmann;Diane Pecher;Piotr Winkielman

  • Introduction to the special topic embodied and grounded cognition

    Anna M. Borghi;Diane Pecher

  • Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology

    Rolf A. Zwaan;Diane Pecher;Gabriele Paolacci;Samantha Bouwmeester

  • Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects

    Diane Pecher;Saskia van Dantzig;Rolf A. Zwaan;René Zeelenberg

  • Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition

    Diane Pecher

  • Retrieval-induced forgetting in implicit memory tests: the role of test awareness.

    Gino Camp;Diane Pecher;Henk G. Schmidt

  • Congruency between Word Position and Meaning is Caused by Task-Induced Spatial Attention

    Diane Pecher;Saskia Van Dantzig;Inge Boot;Kiki Zanolie

  • A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items

    Saskia van Dantzig;Rosemary A. Cowell;René Zeelenberg;Diane Pecher

  • Grounding Cognition: Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking

    Diane Pecher;Rolf A. Zwaan

  • Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Alice F. Healy;Lyle E. Bourne

Frequent Co-Authors

René Zeelenberg
René Zeelenberg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers University of Amsterdam
Piotr Winkielman
Piotr Winkielman University of California, San Diego
Lawrence W. Barsalou
Lawrence W. Barsalou University of Glasgow
Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Sascha Topolinski
Sascha Topolinski University of Cologne
Anna M. Borghi
Anna M. Borghi Sapienza University of Rome
Jamin Halberstadt
Jamin Halberstadt University of Otago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online psychology degrees can open doors to a wide range of career pathways. From clinical work and counseling to roles in research, education, and business, psychology graduates are in demand across various sectors. Online programs provide flexibility for students balancing work or family responsibilities, making it easier to pursue higher education at your own pace.

One important factor to consider is affordability. There are affordable psychology programs in Tuscaloosa, providing cost-effective education for students in Alabama. Similarly, the most affordable psychology degree programs in Texas and the most affordable psychology degree programs in University Park offer options for students seeking quality education at a lower cost.

If you're looking for cost savings in the western U.S., consider the cheapest psychology degrees in Utah. Affordable online degrees not only reduce student debt, but also allow graduates to start their careers with more financial freedom. Carefully reviewing tuition, program reputation, and potential career outcomes will help you choose the right program for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Diane Pecher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles