World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daryl R. Van Tongeren

Daryl R. Van Tongeren

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5454 5066 2978 2702 248 9478

Daryl R. Van Tongeren publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daryl R. Van Tongeren between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daryl R. Van Tongeren published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2023. 34 of the 306 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2023. 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 17 publications
2009 2025

306 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daryl R. Van Tongeren: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 3
2010 7
2011 2
2012 5
2013 8
2014 16
2015 22
2016 34
2017 21
2018 17
2019 31
2020 19
2021 32
2022 15
2023 40
2024 17
2025 17
Total 306
Download as CSV

Daryl R. Van Tongeren publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daryl R. Van Tongeren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 248 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 248
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daryl R. Van Tongeren D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daryl R. Van Tongeren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daryl R. Van Tongeren is affiliated with Hope College in the United States and has established a research profile primarily within psychology and social sciences. Their work encompasses a range of subfields, including social psychology, clinical psychology, health, sociology and political science, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's research is concentrated around several main topics:

  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being

Van Tongeren's publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • "Minimalism, voluntary simplicity, and well-being: A systematic review of the empirical literature" (2021), published in The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • "Religious residue: Cross-cultural evidence that religious psychology and behavior persist following deidentification." (2020), published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Psychological and spiritual outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective longitudinal study of adults with chronic disease." (2021), published in Health Psychology
  • "The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research" (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • "Finding Meaning Amidst COVID-19: An Existential Positive Psychology Model of Suffering" (2021), published in Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Don E. Davis
  • Joshua N. Hook
  • Adam S. Hodge
  • Aaron T. McLaughlin
  • C. Nathan DeWall

Van Tongeren has contributed extensively to various academic journals. Notable venues with numerous publications include:

  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • Spirituality in Clinical Practice
  • Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
  • International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
  • Journal of Psychology and Theology

They have published one book titled The complete researcher: A practical guide for graduate students and early career professionals. (2023), released by the American Psychological Association.

Best Publications

  • Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions

    Don E. Davis;Elise Choe;Joel Meyers;Nathaniel Wade

  • Relational humility: conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment.

    Don E. Davis;Joshua N. Hook;Everett L. Worthington;Daryl R. Van Tongeren

  • Cultural humility and racial microaggressions in counseling.

    Joshua N. Hook;Jennifer E. Farrell;Don E. Davis;Cirleen DeBlaere

  • Humility and the Development and Repair of Social Bonds: Two Longitudinal Studies

    Don E. Davis;Everett L Worthington;Joshua N. Hook;Robert A. Emmons

  • The multicultural orientation framework: A narrative review.

    Don E Davis;Cirleen DeBlaere;Jesse Owen;Joshua N Hook

  • Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership

    Stacey E. McElroy;Kenneth G. Rice;Don E. Davis;Joshua N. Hook

  • Forgiving the self and physical and mental health correlates: a meta-analytic review.

    Don E. Davis;Man Yee Ho;Brandon J. Griffin;Chris Bell

  • Forgiveness Results From Integrating Information About Relationship Value and Exploitation Risk

    Jeni L. Burnette;Michael E. McCullough;Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Don E. Davis

  • Prosociality enhances meaning in life

    Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Jeffrey D. Green;Don E. Davis;Joshua N. Hook

  • Cultural Humility in Psychotherapy Supervision

    Joshua N. Hook;C. Edward Watkins;Don E. Davis;Jesse Owen

  • People both high and low on religious fundamentalism are prejudiced toward dissimilar groups.

    Mark J. Brandt;Daryl R. Van Tongeren

  • The psychological study of religion and spirituality in a disaster context: A systematic review.

    Jamie D Aten;Wendy R Smith;Edward B Davis;Daryl R Van Tongeren

  • Combating Meaninglessness: On the Automatic Defense of Meaning

    Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Jeffrey D. Green

  • Intellectual humility and religious tolerance

    Joshua N. Hook;Jennifer E. Farrell;Kathryn A. Johnson;Daryl R. Van Tongeren

  • Distinguishing intellectual humility and general humility

    Don E. Davis;Kenneth Rice;Stacey McElroy;Cirleen DeBlaere

  • Microaggressions and Perceptions of Cultural Humility in Counseling

    Don E. Davis;Cirleen DeBlaere;Kacy Brubaker;Jesse Owen

  • A meta-analysis of intergroup forgiveness

    Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Jeni L. Burnette;Ernest O’Boyle;Everett L. Worthington

  • Humility and relationship outcomes in couples: The mediating role of commitment.

    Jennifer E. Farrell;Joshua N. Hook;Marciana Ramos;Don E. Davis

  • Gratitude predicts hope and happiness: A two-study assessment of traits and states

    Charlotte vanOyen Witvliet;Fallon J. Richie;Lindsey M. Root Luna;Daryl R. Van Tongeren

  • The Quiet Virtue Speaks: An Intervention to Promote Humility

    Caroline R. Lavelock;Everett L. Worthington;Don E. Davis;Brandon J. Griffin

Frequent Co-Authors

Don E. Davis
Don E. Davis Georgia State University
Joshua N. Hook
Joshua N. Hook University of North Texas
Everett L. Worthington
Everett L. Worthington Virginia Commonwealth University
Kenneth G. Rice
Kenneth G. Rice Georgia State University
Jeni L. Burnette
Jeni L. Burnette North Carolina State University
C. Nathan DeWall
C. Nathan DeWall University of Kentucky
Shawn O. Utsey
Shawn O. Utsey Virginia Commonwealth University
Jesse Owen
Jesse Owen University of Denver
John W. Berry
John W. Berry Queen's University
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of online programs and specialized career pathways. One prominent option for graduates is working toward Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification, which qualifies professionals to practice applied behavior analysis in diverse settings such as schools, clinics, and community organizations.

Each state and city has its own specific requirements. For instance, the bcba certification requirements in Chula Vista highlight the steps necessary for practice in California, including approved coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, those interested in the Midwest should review the bcba certification requirements in Cincinnati and learn about local pathways toward becoming a qualified analyst.

The pathway for becoming a bcba in Cleveland offers another perspective, including region-specific standards and training options. Aspiring professionals in Colorado can find tailored advice and program plans by examining Colorado Springs bcba education requirements to ensure eligibility and employment readiness.

Exploring these local requirements can help psychology students make informed decisions about which online degrees or certifications align best with their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Daryl R. Van Tongeren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles