World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 62 3217 2962 1827 1644 343 15651

Don E. Davis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Don E. Davis between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Don E. Davis published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2016. 37 of the 426 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2016. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 49 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 43 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 41 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 22 publications
1982 2025

426 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Don E. Davis: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 4
2010 9
2011 11
2012 12
2013 21
2014 22
2015 29
2016 49
2017 42
2018 20
2019 43
2020 28
2021 36
2022 17
2023 41
2024 15
2025 22
Total 426
Download as CSV

Don E. Davis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don E. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 343 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85 343
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Don E. Davis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don E. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 62
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Don E. Davis is affiliated with Georgia State University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, health, sociology and political science, and applied psychology.

Their scholarly contributions include topics related to religion, spirituality, and psychology, forgiveness and related behaviors, counseling practices and supervision, resilience and mental health, grief, bereavement, and mental health, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, as well as migration, health, and trauma.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Don E. Davis cover a diverse range of subjects, including:

  • Virtue, flourishing, and positive psychology in psychotherapy: An overview and research prospectus. (2020, Psychotherapy)
  • Minimalism, voluntary simplicity, and well-being: A systematic review of the empirical literature. (2021, The Journal of Positive Psychology)
  • Stepping Outside the Echo Chamber: Is Intellectual Humility Associated With Less Political Myside Bias? (2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
  • Psychological and spiritual outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective longitudinal study of adults with chronic disease. (2021, Health Psychology)
  • Cultural humility in psychotherapy and clinical supervision: A research review. (2021, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research)

Frequent co-authors of Don E. Davis include:

  • Joshua N. Hook
  • Daryl R. Van Tongeren
  • Jesse Owen
  • Cirleen DeBlaere
  • Adam S. Hodge

The researcher has extensively published in several key venues, notably:

  • The Journal of Positive Psychology (13 publications)
  • Spirituality in Clinical Practice (13 publications)
  • Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (6 publications)
  • Professional Psychology Research and Practice (5 publications)
  • Journal of Psychology and Theology (5 publications)

In terms of book publications, Don E. Davis has contributed to works published by the American Psychological Association, including:

  • The complete researcher: A practical guide for graduate students and early career professionals. (2023)
  • Cultural humility: Engaging diverse identities in therapy (2nd ed.). (2025)

Best Publications

  • Cultural humility: measuring openness to culturally diverse clients.

    Joshua N. Hook;Don E. Davis;Jesse Owen;Everett L. Worthington Jr.

  • Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions

    Don E. Davis;Elise Choe;Joel Meyers;Nathaniel Wade

  • Relational humility: conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment.

    Don E. Davis;Joshua N. Hook;Everett L. Worthington;Daryl R. Van Tongeren

  • Religion and spirituality.

    Everett L. Worthington;Joshua N. Hook;Don E. Davis;Michael A. McDaniel

  • Humility: Review of measurement strategies and conceptualization as personality judgment

    Don E. Davis;Everett L. Worthington;Joshua N. Hook

  • Insecure attachment and depressive symptoms: The mediating role of rumination, empathy, and forgiveness

    Jeni L. Burnette;Don E. Davis;Jeffrey D. Green;Everett L. Worthington

  • Empirically supported religious and spiritual therapies.

    Joshua N. Hook;Everett L. Worthington;Don E. Davis;David J. Jennings

  • Cultural humility and racial microaggressions in counseling.

    Joshua N. Hook;Jennifer E. Farrell;Don E. Davis;Cirleen DeBlaere

  • Client perceptions of therapists’ multicultural orientation: Cultural (missed) opportunities and cultural humility.

    Jesse Owen;Karen W. Tao;Joanna M. Drinane;Joshua Hook

  • Humility and the Development and Repair of Social Bonds: Two Longitudinal Studies

    Don E. Davis;Everett L Worthington;Joshua N. Hook;Robert A. Emmons

  • Research on religion/spirituality and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review.

    Don E. Davis;Everett L. Worthington Jr.;Joshua N. Hook;Peter C. Hill

  • The multicultural orientation framework: A narrative review.

    Don E Davis;Cirleen DeBlaere;Jesse Owen;Joshua N Hook

  • Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership

    Stacey E. McElroy;Kenneth G. Rice;Don E. Davis;Joshua N. Hook

  • Integrating clients' religion and spirituality within psychotherapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis.

    Laura E. Captari;Joshua N. Hook;William Hoyt;Don E. Davis

  • Forgiving the self and physical and mental health correlates: a meta-analytic review.

    Don E. Davis;Man Yee Ho;Brandon J. Griffin;Chris Bell

  • Cultural humility: A therapeutic framework for engaging diverse clients.

    David K. Mosher;Joshua N. Hook;Laura E. Captari;Don E. Davis

  • Forgiveness Results From Integrating Information About Relationship Value and Exploitation Risk

    Jeni L. Burnette;Michael E. McCullough;Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Don E. Davis

  • Using Learning Analytics to Understand the Learning Pathways of Novice Programmers

    Matthew Berland;Taylor Martin;Tom Benton;Carmen Petrick Smith

  • Prosociality enhances meaning in life

    Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Jeffrey D. Green;Don E. Davis;Joshua N. Hook

  • Cultural Humility: Engaging Diverse Identities in Therapy

    Joshua N. Hook;Don Davis;Jesse Owen;Cirleen DeBlaere

  • Measuring Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity: A Critical Review of Instruments

    Joshua N. Hook;Jan P. Hook;Don E. Davis;Everett L. Worthington

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua N. Hook
Joshua N. Hook University of North Texas
Everett L. Worthington
Everett L. Worthington Virginia Commonwealth University
Jesse Owen
Jesse Owen University of Denver
Kenneth G. Rice
Kenneth G. Rice Georgia State University
Shawn O. Utsey
Shawn O. Utsey Virginia Commonwealth University
Jeni L. Burnette
Jeni L. Burnette North Carolina State University
Joshua B. Grubbs
Joshua B. Grubbs Bowling Green State University
C. Edward Watkins
C. Edward Watkins University of North Texas
Joseph Bulbulia
Joseph Bulbulia Victoria University of Wellington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to various rewarding career options, including becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Online psychology programs can offer a flexible route to fulfilling educational requirements, but each state sets its own standards for licensure. It's important to carefully review local requirements before choosing a pathway.

For example, lpc licensure requirements in Pennsylvania emphasize completion of graduate-level coursework and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, lpc license requirements in Rhode Island and lpc license requirements in South Carolina specify unique requirements for education, examination, and post-degree experience.

If you are considering South Dakota, make sure to review the lpc licensure requirements in South Dakota for important details about degree programs and internship hours.

Prospective students should choose an online degree that not only matches career aspirations, but also aligns with state licensing requirements. Careful planning will help you transition from academic study to professional practice smoothly, ensuring long-term success in your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Don E. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles