World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9441 8824 5002 4557 100 6621

Jeni L. Burnette publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeni L. Burnette between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeni L. Burnette published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2020. 13 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
2004 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeni L. Burnette: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 3
2006 1
2007 7
2008 2
2009 2
2010 6
2011 4
2012 6
2013 4
2014 8
2015 5
2016 0
2017 5
2018 9
2019 6
2020 11
2021 6
2022 7
2023 5
2024 6
2025 7
Total 111
Download as CSV

Jeni L. Burnette publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeni L. Burnette sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 100
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeni L. Burnette D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeni L. Burnette sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeni L. Burnette is affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States and focuses primarily on psychology, with a particular emphasis on social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology.

Their research explores a variety of topics within psychology, including:

  • Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Burnette's recent publications cover themes related to growth mindsets, motivation, and psychological health. Notable papers include:

  • "A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?" (2022) published in Psychological Bulletin
  • "Growth mindsets and psychological distress: A meta-analysis" (2020) published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "A systematic review of growth mindset intervention implementation strategies" (2022) published in Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • "Growth Mindset Messaging in Stigma-Relevant Contexts: Harnessing Benefits Without Costs" (2020), with coauthor Crystal L. Hoyt, published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • "Growth mindsets: defining, assessing, and exploring effects on motivation for entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs" (2021), with coauthor Joseph Billingsley, published in Current Psychology

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, such as Crystal L. Hoyt, Joseph Billingsley, Whitney Becker, Sydney Earl, and Laura E. Knouse.

Burnette's work has appeared recurrently in certain publication venues, demonstrating a consistent engagement with these forums. These venues include:

  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Stigma and Health
  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Best Publications

  • Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation.

    Jeni L. Burnette;Ernest H. O'Boyle;Eric M. VanEpps;Jeffrey M. Pollack

  • Insecure attachment and depressive symptoms: The mediating role of rumination, empathy, and forgiveness

    Jeni L. Burnette;Don E. Davis;Jeffrey D. Green;Everett L. Worthington

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?

    Unknown

  • Implicit Theories of Body Weight: Entity Beliefs Can Weigh You Down

    Jeni L. Burnette

  • Forgiveness Results From Integrating Information About Relationship Value and Exploitation Risk

    Jeni L. Burnette;Michael E. McCullough;Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Don E. Davis

  • Gender Bias in Leader Evaluations Merging Implicit Theories and Role Congruity Perspectives

    Crystal L. Hoyt;Jeni L. Burnette

  • Growth mindsets and psychological distress: A meta-analysis.

    Jeni L. Burnette;Laura E. Knouse;Dylan T. Vavra;Ernest O'Boyle

  • A Growth Mindset Intervention: Enhancing Students’ Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Career Development:

    Jeni L. Burnette;Jeffrey M. Pollack;Rachel B. Forsyth;Crystal L. Hoyt

  • Attachment and trait forgivingness: The mediating role of angry rumination

    Jeni L. Burnette;Kelli W. Taylor;Everett L. Worthington;Donelson R. Forsyth

  • Vengefully ever after: destiny beliefs, state attachment anxiety, and forgiveness.

    Eli J. Finkel;Jeni L. Burnette;Lauren E. Scissors

  • I Can Do That The Impact of Implicit Theories on Leadership Role Model Effectiveness

    Crystal L. Hoyt;Jeni L. Burnette;Audrey N. Innella

  • An online growth mindset intervention in a sample of rural adolescent girls.

    Jeni L. Burnette;Michelle V. Russell;Crystal L. Hoyt;Kasey Orvidas

  • Buffering against weight gain following dieting setbacks: An implicit theory intervention

    Jeni L. Burnette;Eli J. Finkel

  • "Obesity is a disease": examining the self-regulatory impact of this public-health message

    Crystal L. Hoyt;Jeni L. Burnette;Lisa Auster-Gussman

  • A meta-analysis of intergroup forgiveness

    Daryl R. Van Tongeren;Jeni L. Burnette;Ernest O’Boyle;Everett L. Worthington

  • Third-Party Forgiveness: (Not) Forgiving Your Close Other's Betrayer

    Jeffrey D. Green;Jeni L. Burnette;Jody L. Davis

  • Individual differences in implicit theories of leadership ability and self-efficacy: Predicting responses to stereotype threat

    Jeni L. Burnette;Jeffrey M. Pollack;Crystal L. Hoyt

  • ATTEMPTING TO IMPROVE THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STRUGGLING COLLEGE STUDENTS BY BOLSTERING THEIR SELF-ESTEEM: AN INTERVENTION THAT BACKFIRED

    Dondelson R. Forsyth;Natalie K. Lawrence;Jeni L. Burnette;Roy F. Baumeister

  • Against the odds: academic underdogs benefit from incremental theories

    Jody L. Davis;Jeni L. Burnette;Scott T. Allison;Heather Stone

  • Collectivistic Self-Construal and Forgiveness.

    Joshua N. Hook;Everett L. Worthington;Shawn O. Utsey;Don E. Davis

  • The obesity stigma asymmetry model: The indirect and divergent effects of blame and changeability beliefs on antifat prejudice.

    Crystal L. Hoyt;Jeni L. Burnette;Lisa Auster-Gussman;Alison Blodorn

Frequent Co-Authors

Crystal L. Hoyt
Crystal L. Hoyt University of Richmond
Jeffrey M. Pollack
Jeffrey M. Pollack North Carolina State University
Don E. Davis
Don E. Davis Georgia State University
Donelson R. Forsyth
Donelson R. Forsyth University of Richmond
Everett L. Worthington
Everett L. Worthington Virginia Commonwealth University
Michael E. McCullough
Michael E. McCullough University of California, San Diego
Eli J. Finkel
Eli J. Finkel Northwestern University
Joshua N. Hook
Joshua N. Hook University of North Texas
Sarah L. Desmarais
Sarah L. Desmarais North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially for those interested in counseling, clinical practice, or behavioral science. Many universities across the USA now offer flexible online programs that prepare graduates for roles in mental health, education, or community services.

When considering your options, it helps to look at program rankings and regional specialties. For instance, the best counseling program rankings in the Midwest can guide students seeking reputable and accredited programs in that area. Similarly, those interested in focusing on a particular state can review the top counseling degree programs in Minnesota or explore opportunities in the South, such as the top counseling degree programs in Mississippi.

Pursuing an online degree can also make it possible to access leading institutions beyond your immediate region. For example, the top counseling degree programs in Nashville are popular for students seeking to build a counseling career in Tennessee or the wider Southeast.

Ultimately, researching accredited programs and state-specific licensure requirements is crucial for aligning your education with your career goals in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Jeni L. Burnette

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles