World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
13039
World Ranking
6826
National Ranking
3703

Donelson R. Forsyth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donelson R. Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 170 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Donelson R. Forsyth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donelson R. Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donelson R. Forsyth is affiliated with the University of Richmond in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary subfields, including Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their recent publications include:

  • Recent advances in the study of group cohesion, 2021, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
  • Group-level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach, 2020, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice

Forsyth has contributed regularly to the publication venue Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, with three papers published there. Other publication venues include PsycEXTRA Dataset, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, PLoS ONE, and Personality and Individual Differences.

Their research interests focus on topics such as the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, ethics in business and education, social and intergroup psychology, ethics in medical practice, COVID-19 and mental health, mental health treatment and access, and digital mental health interventions.

Frequent collaborators in Forsyth's work are:

  • Ernest H. O'Boyle
  • Cheri L. Marmarosh
  • Bernhard Strauß
  • Gary M. Burlingame
  • Athena H. Cairo

Some of Forsyth's notable papers are:

  • Recent advances in the study of group cohesion, 2021, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
  • Group-level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach, 2020, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice

Best Publications

  • A taxonomy of ethical ideologies.

    Donelson R. Forsyth

  • A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective.

    Ernest H. O'Boyle Jr.;Donelson R. Forsyth;George C. Banks;Michael A. McDaniel

  • Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies

    Donelson R. Forsyth

  • Handbook of social and clinical psychology : the health perspective

    C. R. Snyder;Donelson R. Forsyth

  • On the ethics of psychological research

    Barry R Schlenker;Donelson R Forsyth

  • East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism

    Donelson R. Forsyth;Ernest H. Jr. O'Boyle;Michael A. McDaniel

  • A Meta-analytic Test of Redundancy and Relative Importance of the Dark Triad and Five-factor Model of Personality

    Ernest H. O'Boyle;Donelson R. Forsyth;George C. Banks;Paul A. Story

  • Idealism, Relativism, and the Ethic of Caring

    Donelson R. Forsyth;Judith L. Nye;Karl Kelley

  • The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory.

    Judith L. Nye;Donelson R. Forsyth

  • Personal moral philosophies and moral choice

    Donelson R Forsyth;Judith L Nye

  • Group dynamics, 2nd ed.

    Donelson R. Forsyth

  • The Effects of Ethical Ideology on Moral Behavior

    Donelson R. Forsyth;Rick E. Berger

  • Moral Judgment The Influence of Ethical Ideology

    Donelson R. Forsyth

  • Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors.

    Mark R. Leary;Donelson R. Forsyth

  • Attributions, Affect, and Expectations: A Test of Weiner's Three-Dimensional Model

    Donelson R. Forsyth;James H. McMillan

  • Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis

    Donelson R. Forsyth;William R. Pope

  • Individual Differences in Information Integration During Moral Judgment

    Donelson R. Forsyth

  • The functions of attributions.

    Donelson R. Forsyth

  • Practical proposals for motivating students

    Donelson R. Forsyth;James H. McMillan

  • Bad Apples or Bad Barrels: An Examination of Group- and Organizational-Level Effects in the Study of Counterproductive Work Behavior

    Ernest H. O'Boyle;Donelson R. Forsyth;Allison S. O'Boyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry R. Schlenker
Barry R. Schlenker University of Florida
James H. McMillan
James H. McMillan Virginia Commonwealth University
Ernest H. O'Boyle
Ernest H. O'Boyle Indiana University
Jeni L. Burnette
Jeni L. Burnette North Carolina State University
Mark R. Leary
Mark R. Leary Duke University
Everett L. Worthington
Everett L. Worthington Virginia Commonwealth University
Crystal L. Hoyt
Crystal L. Hoyt University of Richmond
Michael A. McDaniel
Michael A. McDaniel Virginia Commonwealth University
Timothy R. Elliott
Timothy R. Elliott Texas A&M University
Diane N. Ruble
Diane N. Ruble New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students opt for counseling programs, which combine foundational psychological theory with practical skills. These programs help graduates pursue roles in schools, hospitals, mental health clinics, and private practice.

Different regions offer unique advantages for your studies. For example, the Baltimore counseling degree programs are recognized for their strong clinical focus, while the top counseling degree programs in Boston emphasize research and innovation. Students interested in multicultural counseling and integrated care can explore the top counseling degree programs in California. For those seeking urban clinical training and professional networking, the best college counseling programs in Chicago are worth considering.

As more universities offer flexible online formats, pursuing a counseling degree is now more accessible than ever—helping you build a rewarding career in mental health, guidance, or therapy wherever you are in the US.

Best Scientists Citing Donelson R. Forsyth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles