World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 38 6534 6054 203 197 202 5174

Daniele Penna publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniele Penna between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniele Penna published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2025. 30 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniele Penna: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 9
2011 8
2012 14
2013 16
2014 13
2015 7
2016 15
2017 8
2018 24
2019 19
2020 17
2021 17
2022 20
2023 26
2024 25
2025 29
2026 1
Total 271
Download as CSV

Daniele Penna publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniele Penna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 202 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333 202
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniele Penna D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniele Penna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344 38
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniele Penna is a researcher affiliated with the University of Florence in Italy. Their work spans multiple areas within environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to hydrological and ecological studies.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

The research also delves into specialized subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Ecology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Penna's main topics of work cover a range of interconnected themes:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

The scientist has contributed to multiple research articles published recently. Notable papers include:

  • "Seasonal snow cover decreases young water fractions in high Alpine catchments", 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • "Evaporation enhancement drives the European water-budget deficit during multi-year droughts", 2022, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • "On the Spatio-Temporal Under-Representation of Isotopic Data in Ecohydrological Studies", 2021, Frontiers in Water
  • "Transpiration patterns and water use strategies of beech and oak trees along a hillslope", 2021, Ecohydrology
  • "The Role of Snowmelt on the Spatio-Temporal Variability of Spring Recharge in a Dolomitic Mountain Group, Italian Alps", 2020, Water

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniele Penna include:

  • Giulia Zuecco
  • Marco Borga
  • Julian Klaus
  • Christian Massari
  • Ginevra Fabiani

Research articles are often published in several well-known scientific journals. Key venues where their work appears include:

  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Ecohydrology
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Agricultural Water Management
  • Hydrology and earth system sciences

Best Publications

  • The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment

    D. Penna;H. J. Tromp-van Meerveld;A. Gobbi;M. Borga

  • The demographics of water: A review of water ages in the critical zone

    Matthias Sprenger;Matthias Sprenger;Matthias Sprenger;Christine Stumpp;Markus Weiler;Werner Aeschbach

  • Hillslope scale soil moisture variability in a steep alpine terrain

    Daniele Penna;Marco Borga;Daniele Norbiato;Giancarlo Dalla Fontana

  • Soil moisture temporal stability at different depths on two alpine hillslopes during wet and dry periods

    Daniele Penna;Daniele Penna;L. Brocca;M. Borga;G. Dalla Fontana

  • Effects of climatic seasonality on the isotopic composition of evaporating soil waters

    Paolo Benettin;Till H.M. Volkmann;Jana Freiin von Freyberg;Jana Freiin von Freyberg;Jay Frentress

  • Ideas and perspectives: Tracing terrestrial ecosystem water fluxes using hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes – challenges and opportunities from an interdisciplinary perspective

    Daniele Penna;Luisa Hopp;Francesca Scandellari;Scott T. Allen

  • On the reproducibility and repeatability of laser absorption spectroscopy measurements for δ2H and δ18O isotopic analysis

    D. Penna;Barbara Stenni;M. Šanda;S. Wrede

  • A versatile index to characterize hysteresis between hydrological variables at the runoff event timescale

    Giulia Zuecco;Daniele Penna;Marco Borga;H J van Meerveld

  • Technical Note: Evaluation of between-sample memory effects in the analysis of δ2H and δ18O of water samples measured by laser spectroscopes

    D. Penna;D. Penna;Barbara Stenni;M. Šanda;S. Wrede

  • Tracer-based analysis of spatial and temporal variations of water sources in a glacierized catchment

    Daniele Penna;M. Engel;L. Mao;A. Dell'Agnese

  • A new monitoring station for debris flows in the European Alps: first observations in the Gadria basin

    F. Comiti;L. Marchi;P. Macconi;M. Arattano

  • Seasonal changes in runoff generation in a small forested mountain catchment

    Daniele Penna;Daniele Penna;H. J. van Meerveld;H. J. van Meerveld;O. Oliviero;G. Zuecco

  • Hydrological response of an Alpine catchment to rainfall and snowmelt events

    Daniele Penna;H. J. van Meerveld;G. Zuecco;G. Dalla Fontana

  • Bedload hysteresis in a glacier-fed mountain river

    Luca Mao;Andrea Dell'Agnese;Carolina Huincache;Daniele Penna;Daniele Penna

  • Identifying run‐off contributions during melt‐induced run‐off events in a glacierized alpine catchment

    Michael Engel;Daniele Penna;Giacomo Bertoldi;Andrea Dell'Agnese

  • Rainfall estimation from in situ soil moisture observations at several sites in Europe: an evaluation of the SM2RAIN algorithm

    Luca Brocca;Christian Massari;Luca Ciabatta;Tommaso Moramarco

  • Water sources for root water uptake: Using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen as a research tool in agricultural and agroforestry systems

    Daniele Penna;Josie Geris;Luisa Hopp;Francesca Scandellari

  • Towards a tracer-based conceptualization of meltwater dynamics and streamflow response in a glacierized catchment

    Daniele Penna;Michael Engel;Giacomo Bertoldi;Francesco Comiti

  • Quantification of subsurface hydrologic connectivity in four headwater catchments using graph theory.

    Giulia Zuecco;Michael Rinderer;Michael Rinderer;Daniele Penna;Marco Borga

  • A field and modeling study of nonlinear storage‐discharge dynamics for an Alpine headwater catchment

    Matteo Camporese;Matteo Camporese;Daniele Penna;Daniele Penna;Daniele Penna;Marco Borga;Claudio Paniconi

  • The influence of grid resolution on the prediction of natural and road-related shallow landslides

    Daniele Penna;Daniele Penna;M. Borga;G. T. Aronica;G. Brigandì

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Borga
Marco Borga University of Padua
Francesco Comiti
Francesco Comiti Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Jeffrey J. McDonnell
Jeffrey J. McDonnell University of Saskatchewan
Luca Mao
Luca Mao University of Lincoln
Massimo Tagliavini
Massimo Tagliavini Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Paolo Tarolli
Paolo Tarolli University of Padua
Julian Klaus
Julian Klaus University of Bonn
Patrick Matgen
Patrick Matgen Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Tommaso Anfodillo
Tommaso Anfodillo University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career opportunities. For those looking to diversify their skill set, considering related online degrees can enhance employability and expertise.

For example, language skills remain valuable in global scientific collaboration. Exploring short Spanish degrees can complement an Earth Science background, especially for professionals working in international environmental research or policy development.

Veterans interested in further education may find tailored programs suited to their unique needs, such as the best military friendly online Spanish degrees, that offer flexible schedules and supportive services.

Creative disciplines also intersect with Earth Science, for example in environmental writing and communication. Pursuing an online MFA creative writing can strengthen your ability to convey complex scientific concepts to diverse audiences.

Additionally, understanding organizational dynamics is crucial for managing environmental projects or teams. Many professionals upgrade their qualifications through the best online master degree in human resource management, which offers strategies relevant to leadership within science-driven workplaces.

Best Scientists Citing Daniele Penna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles