World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ernest H. O'Boyle

Ernest H. O'Boyle

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
12585
World Ranking
8054
National Ranking
4312

Ernest H. O'Boyle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernest H. O'Boyle sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ernest H. O'Boyle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernest H. O'Boyle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ernest H. O'Boyle is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple topics within the social sciences, with a focus on interdisciplinary approaches involving statistics, sociology, psychology, and management studies.

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Organizational Research Methods

O'Boyle's work primarily covers the following main fields of study:

  • Social Sciences

Within these, the subfields of study they address include:

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Their research topics reflect a variety of focuses such as:

  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Personality Traits and Psychology

Among their recent published papers are the following:

  • "Endogeneity: A Review and Agenda for the Methodology-Practice Divide Affecting Micro and Macro Research" (2020, Journal of Management)
  • "Passion at work: A meta-analysis of individual work outcomes" (2020, Journal of Organizational Behavior)
  • "Growth mindsets and psychological distress: A meta-analysis" (2020, Clinical Psychology Review)
  • "Fatal attraction: A systematic review and research agenda of the dark triad in entrepreneurship" (2021, Journal of Business Venturing)
  • "Sleep and self-control: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021, Sleep Medicine Reviews)

O'Boyle frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Martin Götz
  • George C. Banks
  • Sheryl L. Walter
  • Jeffrey M. Pollack
  • Ji Woon Ryu

Best Publications

  • The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta‐analysis

    Ernest H. O'Boyle;Ronald H. Humphrey;Jeffrey M. Pollack;Thomas H. Hawver

  • A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective.

    Ernest H. O'Boyle Jr.;Donelson R. Forsyth;George C. Banks;Michael A. McDaniel

  • Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation.

    Jeni L. Burnette;Ernest H. O'Boyle;Eric M. VanEpps;Jeffrey M. Pollack

  • Job Burnout and Employee Engagement: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Construct Proliferation

    Michael S. Cole;Frank Walter;Arthur G. Bedeian;Ernest H. O'Boyle

  • Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI.

    Dana L. Joseph;Jing Jin;Daniel A. Newman;Ernest H. O'Boyle

  • A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge?

    Sheryl L. Walter;Scott E. Seibert;Daniel Goering;Ernest H. O’Boyle

  • Star Performers in Twenty‐First Century Organizations

    Herman Aguinis;Ernest O'Boyle

  • Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels.

    Larry J. Williams;Ernest H. O'Boyle

  • THE BEST AND THE REST: REVISITING THE NORM OF NORMALITY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE

    Ernest O’Boyle;Herman Aguinis

  • What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange

    George C. Banks;John H. Batchelor;Anson Seers;Ernest H. O'Boyle

  • East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism

    Donelson R. Forsyth;Ernest H. Jr. O'Boyle;Michael A. McDaniel

  • Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms' financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects

    Ernest H. O'Boyle;Jeffrey M. Pollack;Matthew W. Rutherford

  • A Meta-analytic Test of Redundancy and Relative Importance of the Dark Triad and Five-factor Model of Personality

    Ernest H. O'Boyle;Donelson R. Forsyth;George C. Banks;Paul A. Story

  • Management’s Science–Practice Gap: A Grand Challenge for All Stakeholders

    George C. Banks;Jeffrey M. Pollack;Jaime E. Bochantin;Bradley L. Kirkman

  • Passion at work: A meta-analysis of individual work outcomes

    Jeffrey M. Pollack;Violet T. Ho;Ernest H. O'Boyle;Bradley L. Kirkman

  • Growth mindsets and psychological distress: A meta-analysis.

    Jeni L. Burnette;Laura E. Knouse;Dylan T. Vavra;Ernest O'Boyle

  • Best practices in developing, conducting, and evaluating inductive research

    Sang Eun Woo;Ernest H. O'Boyle;Paul E. Spector

  • Bad Apples or Bad Barrels: An Examination of Group- and Organizational-Level Effects in the Study of Counterproductive Work Behavior

    Ernest H. O'Boyle;Donelson R. Forsyth;Allison S. O'Boyle

  • Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices

    George C. Banks;James G. Field;Frederick L. Oswald;Ernest H. O’Boyle

  • Decomposing model fit: measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables.

    Ernest H. O'Boyle Jr.;Larry J. Williams

  • The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A metaanalysis

    Ernest H. O’Boyle;Ronald H. Humphrey;Jeffrey M. Pollack;Thomas H. Hawver

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry J. Williams
Larry J. Williams Texas Tech University
Donelson R. Forsyth
Donelson R. Forsyth University of Richmond
Jeffrey M. Pollack
Jeffrey M. Pollack North Carolina State University
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Scott E. Seibert
Scott E. Seibert University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Daniel A. Newman
Daniel A. Newman University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael A. McDaniel
Michael A. McDaniel Virginia Commonwealth University
Jeni L. Burnette
Jeni L. Burnette North Carolina State University
Ronald H. Humphrey
Ronald H. Humphrey Lancaster University
Ronald S. Landis
Ronald S. Landis Illinois Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open up diverse career pathways, especially in education and counseling. Many students explore online psychology degrees to gain flexibility and access to specialized programs tailored to their interests.

One popular career choice is becoming a school counselor. Each state has unique qualifications. For example, the requirements to be a school counselor in South Dakota specify approved programs and supervised internship hours. In Tennessee, Tennessee school counselor certification requirements include licensure exams and continuing education credits.

For those interested in other regions, requirements to be a school counselor in Texas highlight the need for a relevant master’s degree and field experience. Meanwhile, the Utah school counselor certification requirements outline specific coursework and comprehensive testing.

Exploring online psychology degrees can be a smart step for those interested in school counseling or similar careers. Make sure to review each state's requirements to ensure your education meets professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing Ernest H. O'Boyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles