World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
27847
World Ranking
9647
National Ranking
5086

Scott E. Seibert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Seibert sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Scott E. Seibert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Seibert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott E. Seibert is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting.

Their notable contributions focus on several subfields, including:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Education
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Seibert's research topics cover a diverse set of areas such as:

  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Higher Education and Employability
  • Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Family Business Performance and Succession

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Referents or role models? The self-efficacy and job performance effects of perceiving higher performing peers." (2020, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • "Toward a broader understanding of career shocks: Exploring interdisciplinary connections with research on job search, human resource management, entrepreneurship, and diversity" (2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior)
  • "Understanding Contemporary Career Success: A Critical Review" (2023, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior)
  • "What matters more for entrepreneurship success? A meta-analysis comparing general mental ability and emotional intelligence in entrepreneurial settings" (2020, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal)
  • "The role of career shocks in contemporary career development: key challenges and ways forward" (2021, Career Development International)

Seibert frequently collaborates with other scholars. Some of their most common coauthors include:

  • Maria L. Kraimer
  • Jos Akkermans
  • Cheng-Huan Liu
  • Ernest H. O'Boyle
  • Stefan T. Mol

Their work has been published repeatedly in the following venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior

Best Publications

  • The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions.

    Hao Zhao;Scott E. Seibert;Gerald E. Hills

  • A Social Capital Theory of Career Success

    Scott E. Seibert;Maria L. Kraimer;Robert C. Liden

  • Proactive personality and career success.

    S E Seibert;J M Crant;M L Kraimer

  • The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review.

    Hao Zhao;Scott E. Seibert

  • WHAT DO PROACTIVE PEOPLE DO? A LONGITUDINAL MODEL LINKING PROACTIVE PERSONALITY AND CAREER SUCCESS

    Scott E. Seibert;Maria L. Kraimer;J. Michael Crant

  • The Relationship of Personality to Entrepreneurial Intentions and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Hao Zhao;Scott E. Seibert;G. T. Lumpkin

  • Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review.

    Scott E. Seibert;Gang Wang;Stephen H. Courtright

  • Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction

    Scott E. Seibert;Seth R. Silver;W. Alan Randolph

  • The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Success

    Scott E. Seibert;Maria L. Kraimer

  • Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational Support for Development: The Critical Role of Career Opportunities

    Maria L. Kraimer;Scott E. Seibert;Sandy J. Wayne;Robert C. Liden

  • TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION

    Unknown

  • A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge?

    Sheryl L. Walter;Scott E. Seibert;Daniel Goering;Ernest H. O’Boyle

  • Psychological Empowerment as a Multidimensional Construct: A Test of Construct Validity

    Maria L. Kraimer;Scott E. Seibert;Robert C. Liden

  • Even the best laid plans sometimes go askew: Career self-management processes, career shocks, and the decision to pursue graduate education.

    Scott E. Seibert;Maria L. Kraimer;Brooks C. Holtom;Abigail J. Pierotti

  • The Effectiveness of Facilitated Mentoring: A Longitudinal Quasi-Experiment☆☆☆★

    Scott Seibert

  • Tales of the unexpected: Integrating career shocks in the contemporary careers literature

    Jos Akkermans;Scott E. Seibert;Stefan T. Mol

  • Psychological contract breach and employee innovation: A conservation of resources perspective

    Kohyar Kiazad;Scott E. Seibert;Maria L. Kraimer

  • Linking Developmental Experiences to Leader Effectiveness and Promotability: The Mediating Role of Leadership Self-Efficacy and Mentor Network

    Scott E. Seibert;Leisa D. Sargent;Maria L. Kraimer;Kohyar Kiazad

  • Developing career resilience and adaptability

    Scott E. Seibert;Maria L. Kraimer;Peter A. Heslin

  • Measuring Career Orientations in the Era of the Boundaryless Career

    Jesus Bravo;Scott E. Seibert;Maria L. Kraimer;Sandy J. Wayne

  • Chapter 1 Synthesizing What We Know and Looking Ahead: A Meta-Analytical Review of 30 Years of Emotional Labor Research

    Gang Wang;Scott E. Seibert;Terry L. Boles

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria L. Kraimer
Maria L. Kraimer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ernest H. O'Boyle
Ernest H. O'Boyle Indiana University
Brooks C. Holtom
Brooks C. Holtom Georgetown University
Robert C. Liden
Robert C. Liden University of Illinois at Chicago
M. Susan Taylor
M. Susan Taylor University of Maryland, College Park
Cynthia Lee
Cynthia Lee Northeastern University
Sandy J. Wayne
Sandy J. Wayne University of Illinois at Chicago
David G. Allen
David G. Allen Texas Christian University
K. Michele Kacmar
K. Michele Kacmar Texas State University
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online programs and career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health services. For those interested in specialized careers, substance abuse counseling is a rapidly growing field with region-specific requirements.

The path to becoming a counselor can vary significantly by location. For example, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Raleigh detail the educational credentials and supervised experience necessary for practice in North Carolina. Similarly, understanding substance abuse counselor requirements in Reno can help you navigate the Nevada licensing process.

In Virginia, the Richmond substance abuse counselors education requirements focus on prescribed coursework and practical hours. Meanwhile, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Riverside explore California’s licensing system and continuing education.

As you plan your future in psychology, exploring region-specific requirements and accredited online degree options can help you chart a clear, rewarding career path.

Best Scientists Citing Scott E. Seibert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles