World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
84
Citations
39008
World Ranking
1209
National Ranking
743

K. Michele Kacmar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Michele Kacmar sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 201 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

K. Michele Kacmar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Michele Kacmar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

K. Michele Kacmar is affiliated with Texas State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting, with a focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, and Gender Studies.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences

Some of the frequent co-authors collaborating with Kacmar include:

  • Dawn S. Carlson
  • Merideth J. Thompson
  • Min Wan
  • Matthew J. Quade
  • Sara Jansen Perry

Publishing prolifically across a range of venues, the scientist has contributed multiple articles to these journals:

  • Human Relations
  • Human Performance
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Management
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kacmar include the following:

  • Increasing alertness to new opportunities: the influence of positive affect and implications for innovation, 2020, Asia Pacific Journal of Management
  • Does work passion influence prosocial behaviors at work and home? Examining the underlying work-family mechanisms, 2021, Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Beyond the Bottom Line: Don't Forget to Consider the Role of the Family, 2021, Journal of Management
  • Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: A mega-meta path analysis, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress, 2022, Journal of Business and Psychology

Best Publications

  • Construction and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Work–Family Conflict

    Dawn S. Carlson;K.Michele Kacmar;Larry J. Williams

  • Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale.

    Dawn S. Carlson;K. Michele Kacmar;Julie Holliday Wayne;Joseph G. Grzywacz

  • Perceptions of Organizational Politics

    Gerald R. Ferris;K. Michele Kacmar

  • Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities

    Jintong Tang;K. Michele (Micki) Kacmar;Lowell Busenitz

  • AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Christopher L. Shook;David J. Ketchen;G. Tomas M. Hult;K. Michele Kacmar

  • Work–family conflict in the organization: do life role values make a difference?

    Dawn S. Carlson;K. Michele Kacmar

  • Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior.

    Mitchell J. Neubert;K. Michele Kacmar;Dawn S. Carlson;Lawrence B. Chonko

  • A Multi-Level Review of Impression Management Motives and Behaviors

    Mark C. Bolino;K. Michele Kacmar;William H. Turnley;J. Bruce Gilstrap

  • Further Validation of the Perceptions of Politics Scale (Pops): A Multiple Sample Investigation:

    K. Michele Kacmar;Dawn S. Carlson

  • Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale (POPS): Development and Construct Validation

    K. Michele Kacmar;Gerald R. Ferris

  • Work-family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences

    Julie Holliday Wayne;Joseph G. Grzywacz;Dawn S. Carlson;K. Michele Kacmar

  • The Virtuous Influence of Ethical Leadership Behavior: Evidence from the Field

    Mitchell J. Neubert;Dawn S. Carlson;K. Michele Kacmar;James A. Roberts

  • An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship

    Kenneth J. Harris;K. Michele Kacmar;Suzanne Zivnuska

  • Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, and Outcomes

    Gerald R. Ferris;Dwight D. Frink;Maria Carmen Galang;Jing Zhou

  • The Impact of Political Skill on Impression Management Effectiveness

    Kenneth J. Harris;K. Michele Kacmar;Suzanne Zivnuska;Jason D. Shaw

  • Sure Everyone Can Be Replaced … But At What Cost? Turnover As A Predictor Of Unit-Level Performance

    K. Michele Kacmar;Martha C. Andrews;David L. Van Rooy;R. Chris Steilberg

  • Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support

    Martha C. Andrews;K. Michele Kacmar

  • Customer service providers' attitudes relating to customer service and customer satisfaction in the customer-server exchange.

    Alex M. Susskind;K. Michele Kacmar;Carl P. Borchgrevink

  • A Cybernetic Model of Impression Management Processes in Organizations

    Dennis P. Bozeman;K.Michele Kacmar

  • Age, tenure, and job satisfaction: A tale of two perspectives

    Arthur G Bedeian;Gerald R Ferris;K.Michele Kacmar

  • An examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and extension.

    K. Michele Kacmar;Dennis P. Bozeman;Dawn S. Carlson;William P. Anthony

Frequent Co-Authors

Dawn S. Carlson
Dawn S. Carlson Baylor University
Kenneth J. Harris
Kenneth J. Harris Indiana University
Joseph G. Grzywacz
Joseph G. Grzywacz San Jose State University
L. A. Witt
L. A. Witt University of Houston
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
Patrick M. Wright
Patrick M. Wright University of South Carolina
Daniel G. Bachrach
Daniel G. Bachrach University of Alabama
Wayne A. Hochwarter
Wayne A. Hochwarter Florida State University
Ricky W. Griffin
Ricky W. Griffin Texas A&M University
Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben University of Alabama

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of impactful and fulfilling careers. Online degrees in psychology and counseling are popular choices, allowing flexibility for students balancing work or family commitments. With these qualifications, many graduates pursue roles in education, clinical settings, or community organizations.

School counseling is a particularly promising pathway, but requirements vary by state. For example, those interested in this career in Mississippi should become familiar with Mississippi school counselor education requirements. Aspiring counselors in Missouri can refer to the steps outlined in how to become a school counselor in Missouri, while those in Montana can review Montana school counselor certification requirements. Similarly, anyone looking to work in Nebraska should investigate the requirements to be a school counselor in Nebraska.

Researching and understanding state-specific guidelines is essential for aspiring professionals. Online degree programs often incorporate tailored coursework to help you meet these standards, making them an excellent option as you plan your career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing K. Michele Kacmar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles