World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5470 5075 2583 2350 119 17272

Daniel G. Bachrach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel G. Bachrach between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel G. Bachrach published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 18 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 6 publications
2000 2025

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel G. Bachrach: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 2
2005 1
2006 4
2007 1
2008 4
2009 2
2010 2
2011 11
2012 6
2013 5
2014 19
2015 9
2016 14
2017 13
2018 4
2019 3
2020 2
2021 4
2022 3
2023 4
2024 12
2025 6
Total 139
Download as CSV

Daniel G. Bachrach publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Bachrach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 119 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 119
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel G. Bachrach D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Bachrach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Daniel G. Bachrach is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the broad field of Business, Management, and Accounting, with specific contributions in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management, Marketing, and Clinical Psychology as subfields.

The topics covered in their work include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Management and Organizational Studies

Recent publications by Daniel G. Bachrach include:

  • Does "how" firms invest in corporate social responsibility matter? An attributional model of job seekers' reactions to configurational variation in corporate social responsibility (2020, Human Relations)
  • Birds of a feather?: Firm sales growth and narcissism in the upper echelons at the CEO-TMT interface (2022, The Leadership Quarterly)
  • CEO narcissism, top management team transactive memory systems, and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective on CEO admiration and rivalry narcissism (2021, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology)
  • Experiments in supply chain management research: A systematic review and future directions (2024, Journal of Business Logistics)
  • "Too Much" Self-Efficacy? Understanding the Curvilinear Consequences of Between-Person Self-Efficacy through a Moderated-Mediation Model of Perceived Proximity and Employee Effort (2022, Group & Organization Management)

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Pankaj C. Patel
  • Younsung Cho
  • Elliot Bendoly
  • Maria João Guedes
  • Tammy L. Rapp

The venues where Daniel G. Bachrach has published regularly include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Human Relations
  • The Leadership Quarterly
  • Journal of Business Logistics

Daniel G. Bachrach received recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Julie Beth Paine;Daniel G. Bachrach

  • The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Daniel G. Bachrach;Nathan P. Podsakoff

  • Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century:

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Nathan P. Podsakoff;Daniel G. Bachrach

  • Perceived customer showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self-efficacy and performance

    Adam Rapp;Thomas L. Baker;Daniel G. Bachrach;Jessica Ogilvie

  • Fostering good citizenship through ethical leadership: exploring the moderating role of gender and organizational politics.

    K Michele Kacmar;Daniel G Bachrach;Kenneth J Harris;Suzanne Zivnuska

  • Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance.

    Daniel G. Bachrach;Benjamin C. Powell;Brian J. Collins;R. Glenn Richey

  • Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence

    Daniel G. Bachrach;Benjamin C. Powell;Elliot Bendoly;R. Glenn Richey

  • Utility of OCB Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Group Performance in a Resource Allocation Framework

    Tjai M. Nielsen;Daniel G. Bachrach;Eric Sundstrom;Terry R. Halfhill

  • Organizational investments in social capital, managerial coaching, and employee work-related performance

    Andrea D. Ellinger;Alexander E. Ellinger;Daniel G. Bachrach;Yu Lin Wang

  • The influence of time management skill on the curvilinear relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance.

    Adam A. Rapp;Daniel G. Bachrach;Tammy L. Rapp

  • A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations

    Mark C. Bolino;Jaron Harvey;Daniel G. Bachrach

  • Attributions of the "causes" of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance.

    Daniel G. Bachrach;Elliot Bendoly;Philip M. Podsakoff

  • The impact of situational constraints, role stressors, and commitment on employee altruism.

    Steve M. Jex;Gary A. Adams;Daniel G. Bachrach;Sarah Sorenson

  • Influences of organizational investments in social capital on service employee commitment and performance

    Alexander E. Ellinger;Carolyn Casey Findley Musgrove;Andrea D. Ellinger;Daniel G. Bachrach

  • The effects of managerial and employee attributions for corporate social responsibility initiatives

    Pavlos A. Vlachos;Nikolaos G. Panagopoulos;Daniel G. Bachrach;Frederick P. Morgeson

  • Social Network Ties, Transactive Memory, and Performance in Groups

    Jeong Yeon Lee;Daniel G. Bachrach;Kyle Lewis

  • RIGOR IN BEHAVIORAL EXPERIMENTS: A BASIC PRIMER FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT RESEARCHERS

    Daniel G. Bachrach;Elliot Bendoly

  • Operant leadership and employee citizenship: A question of trust?

    Robert S. Rubin;William H. Bommer;Daniel G. Bachrach

  • Organizational Citizenship and Mood: An Experimental Test of Perceived Job Breadth1

    Daniel G. Bachrach;Steve M. Jex

  • Salespeople as knowledge brokers: a review and critique of the challenger sales model

    Adam Rapp;Daniel G. Bachrach;Nikolaos Panagopoulos;Jessica Ogilvie

  • RESEARCH REPORT Fostering Good Citizenship Through Ethical Leadership: Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender and Organizational Politics

    K. Michele Kacmar;Daniel G. Bachrach;Kenneth J. Harris;Suzanne Zivnuska

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam Rapp
Adam Rapp Ohio University
Elliot Bendoly
Elliot Bendoly The Ohio State University
K. Michele Kacmar
K. Michele Kacmar Texas State University
Philip M. Podsakoff
Philip M. Podsakoff University of Florida
Kenneth J. Harris
Kenneth J. Harris Indiana University
R. Glenn Richey
R. Glenn Richey Auburn University
Andrea D. Ellinger
Andrea D. Ellinger The University of Texas at Tyler
Scott B. MacKenzie
Scott B. MacKenzie Indiana University
Frederick P. Morgeson
Frederick P. Morgeson Michigan State University
Alexander E. Ellinger
Alexander E. Ellinger University of Alabama

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens many flexible educational routes. Today, the rise of online learning gives students more access to specialized and accelerated programs, allowing them to balance studies with work or other responsibilities.

For those seeking quick advancement, online masters programs can often be completed in as little as one year. These fast-paced degrees help graduates advance their careers without long delays. Similarly, an accelerated online bachelor's degree lets students earn a respected qualification faster than traditional study, saving both time and money.

Cost is another important consideration. Students interested in social work can explore some of the most affordable msw programs online, reducing the financial barrier to this in-demand profession. Those pursuing behavior analysis careers might consider bcba masters programs that combine affordability with the flexibility of online learning.

These online degree pathways offer not only convenience but also the opportunity to fast-track your career in the broad and meaningful fields of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel G. Bachrach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles