World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
38898
World Ranking
3454
National Ranking
1942

Frederick P. Morgeson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick P. Morgeson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frederick P. Morgeson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick P. Morgeson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick P. Morgeson is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of business, management, and accounting, with a notable concentration in organizational behavior and human resource management. Additional subfields include strategy and management, marketing, information systems and management, and applied psychology.

Their scholarly work addresses several main topics, including job satisfaction and organizational behavior, management and organizational studies, corporate social responsibility reporting, environmental sustainability in business, ethics in business and education, behavioral health and interventions, as well as creativity in education and neuroscience.

Frederick P. Morgeson has contributed articles to a range of academic journals and proceedings. The frequent venues for their publications are:

  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Human Relations

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Morgeson include:

  • Does "how" firms invest in corporate social responsibility matter? An attributional model of job seekers' reactions to configurational variation in corporate social responsibility, 2020, Human Relations
  • The end is just the beginning: Turnover events and their impact on those who remain, 2020, Personnel Psychology
  • Event-Oriented Organizational Behavior Research: A Multilevel Review and Agenda for Future Research, 2023, Journal of Management
  • Why academics attend conferences? An extended career self-management framework, 2020, Human Resource Management Review
  • How Culture Shapes the Influence of Work Design Characteristics: A Narrative and Meta-Analytic Review, 2023, Journal of Management

Frederick P. Morgeson has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Dong Liu
  • Zhenyu Yuan
  • Xiaoyu Wang
  • Jorge A. González
  • Daniel G. Bachrach

Best Publications

  • The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work.

    Frederick P. Morgeson;Stephen E. Humphrey

  • Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features: A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature

    Stephen E. Humphrey;Jennifer D. Nahrgang;Frederick P. Morgeson

  • Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes

    Remus Ilies;Frederick P. Morgeson;Jennifer D. Nahrgang

  • Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes

    Jennifer D. Nahrgang;Frederick P. Morgeson;David A. Hofmann

  • Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis.

    Remus Ilies;Jennifer D. Nahrgang;Frederick P. Morgeson

  • Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes

    Frederick P. Morgeson;D. Scott DeRue;Elizabeth P. Karam

  • The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development

    Frederick P. Morgeson;David A. Hofmann

  • Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar.

    David A. Hofmann;Frederick P. Morgeson;Stephen J. Gerras

  • Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange.

    David A. Hofmann;Frederick P. Morgeson

  • RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS

    Frederick P. Morgeson;Michael A. Campion;Robert L. Dipboye;John R. Hollenbeck

  • Event System Theory: An Event-Oriented Approach to the Organizational Sciences

    Frederick P. Morgeson;Terence R. Mitchell;Dong Liu

  • The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels

    Troy V. Mumford;Michael A. Campion;Frederick P. Morgeson

  • SELECTING INDIVIDUALS IN TEAM SETTINGS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL SKILLS, PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS, AND TEAMWORK KNOWLEDGE

    Frederick P. Morgeson;Matthew H. Reider;Michael A. Campion

  • Developing Leaders via Experience: The Role of Developmental Challenge, Learning Orientation, and Feedback Availability

    D. Scott DeRue;Ned Wellman

  • The Importance of Job Autonomy, Cognitive Ability, and Job-Related Skill for Predicting Role Breadth and Job Performance.

    Frederick P. Morgeson;Kelly Delaney-Klinger;Monica A. Hemingway

  • UNDERSTANDING WORK USING THE OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION NETWORK (O*NET): IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

    Norman G. Peterson;Michael D. Mumford;Walter C. Borman;P. Richard Jeanneret

  • Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature.

    Michael A. McDaniel;Frederick P. Morgeson;Elizabeth Bruhn Finnegan;Michael A. Campion

  • BEYOND EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW VALIDITY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS OVER TIME

    Richard A. Posthuma;Frederick P. Morgeson;Michael A. Campion

  • The Structured Employment Interview: Narrative and Quantitative Review of the Research Literature

    Julia Levashina;Christopher J. Hartwell;Frederick P. Morgeson;Michael A. Campion

  • The External Leadership of Self-Managing Teams: Intervening in the Context of Novel and Disruptive Events

    Frederick P. Morgeson

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Campion
Michael A. Campion Purdue University West Lafayette
Michael T. Brannick
Michael T. Brannick University of South Florida
D. Scott DeRue
D. Scott DeRue University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephen E. Humphrey
Stephen E. Humphrey Pennsylvania State University
David A. Hofmann
David A. Hofmann University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Daniel G. Bachrach
Daniel G. Bachrach University of Alabama
Remus Ilies
Remus Ilies National University of Singapore
Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Chad H. Van Iddekinge Florida State University
Rob B. Briner
Rob B. Briner University of Bath
Gary Johns
Gary Johns Concordia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in a career in psychology, exploring related online degrees can open pathways in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many students choose programs that lead to specialized roles, such as Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Each state and city has specific Richmond mft education requirements or licensing criteria you'll need to meet.

Understanding how to become a marriage and family therapist in Riverside can help you make education decisions if you plan to practice in California. Similarly, reviewing Sacramento mft certification requirements provides insight into additional state-level expectations for therapists.

For those considering careers in the Midwest, it's important to read about Saint Paul mft certification requirements. Researching these different requirements can help you choose the right degree program and prepare for a rewarding career supporting individuals and families.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick P. Morgeson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles