World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8155 7530 686 651 80 5615

Claudia Brandt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudia Brandt between 1998 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudia Brandt published across 26 years, from 1998 to 2023, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2016. 4 of the 84 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2016. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication
1998 2023

84 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudia Brandt: publications per year, 1998 to 2023
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 5
2004 2
2005 0
2006 5
2007 4
2008 2
2009 3
2010 5
2011 3
2012 2
2013 1
2014 6
2015 4
2016 11
2017 9
2018 8
2019 3
2020 1
2021 2
2022 3
2023 1
Total 84
Download as CSV

Claudia Brandt publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Brandt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 80
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudia Brandt D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Brandt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Claudia Brandt is affiliated with the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna in Austria. Their research contributions span several fields including molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The primary topics of Claudia Brandt's work include:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Renal and Vascular Pathologies

Brandt's recent papers cover a variety of research areas and publication venues:

  • "Scopolamine prevents aberrant mossy fiber sprouting and facilitates remission of epilepsy after brain injury," 2021, Neurobiology of Disease
  • "Hydrolytic biotransformation of the bumetanide ester prodrug DIMAEB to bumetanide by esterases in neonatal human and rat serum and neonatal rat brain-A new treatment strategy for neonatal seizures?" 2020, Epilepsia
  • "Neue KfH-Broschüre für Dialysepatienten," 2020, Dialyse aktuell
  • "KfH-Broschüre," 2021, Dialyse aktuell
  • "Mangelernährung vermeiden - Lebensqualität erhalten," 2022, Dialyse aktuell

The most frequent venues publishing Brandt's work are:

  • Dialyse aktuell
  • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Epilepsia
  • Nephrologie aktuell

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Brandt include:

  • Wolfgang Löscher
  • Sebastian Meller
  • Christopher Käufer
  • Björn Gailus
  • Wiebke Theilmann

Brandt's research engages deeply with molecular and cellular aspects of neuroscience, focusing notably on mechanisms underlying epilepsy and receptor signaling pathways. Work on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and ion channel regulation further defines the scope of their investigations. Additionally, some publications address renal and vascular pathologies, indicating an interdisciplinary approach that connects neuropharmacology and systemic health conditions.

Best Publications

  • Prevention or Modification of Epileptogenesis after Brain Insults: Experimental Approaches and Translational Research

    Wolfgang Löscher;Claudia Brandt

  • N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor blockade after status epilepticus protects against limbic brain damage but not against epilepsy in the kainate model of temporal lobe epilepsy

    C Brandt;H Potschka;W Löscher;U Ebert

  • Functional inactivation of a fraction of excitatory synapses in mice deficient for the active zone protein bassoon.

    Wilko D. Altrock;Susanne tom Dieck;Susanne tom Dieck;Maxim Sokolov;Alexander C. Meyer

  • The multidrug transporter hypothesis of drug resistance in epilepsy: Proof-of-principle in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Claudia Brandt;Kerstin Bethmann;Alexandra M. Gastens;Wolfgang Löscher

  • Repeated low-dose treatment of rats with pilocarpine: low mortality but high proportion of rats developing epilepsy.

    Maike Glien;Claudia Brandt;Heidrun Potschka;Henning Voigt

  • Effects of the Novel Antiepileptic Drug Levetiracetam on Spontaneous Recurrent Seizures in the Rat Pilocarpine Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Maike Glien;Claudia Brandt;Heidrun Potschka;Wolfgang Löscher

  • Treatment with valproate after status epilepticus: effect on neuronal damage, epileptogenesis, and behavioral alterations in rats.

    Claudia Brandt;Alexandra M. Gastens;Mei zhen Sun;Maria Hausknecht

  • Disease-Modifying Effects of Phenobarbital and the NKCC1 Inhibitor Bumetanide in the Pilocarpine Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Claudia Brandt;Maia Nozadze;Nina Heuchert;Marta Rattka

  • Epileptogenesis and neuropathology after different types of status epilepticus induced by prolonged electrical stimulation of the basolateral amygdala in rats

    Claudia Brandt;Maike Glien;Heidrun Potschka;Holger Volk

  • Antiepileptic drug resistant rats differ from drug responsive rats in GABAA receptor subunit expression in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy

    Kerstin Bethmann;Jean-Marc Fritschy;Claudia Brandt;Wolfgang Löscher

  • A novel prodrug-based strategy to increase effects of bumetanide in epilepsy.

    Kathrin Töllner;Claudia Brandt;Manuel Töpfer;Gerda Brunhofer

  • Epilepsy induced by extended amygdala-kindling in rats: lack of clear association between development of spontaneous seizures and neuronal damage.

    C. Brandt;U. Ebert;W. Löscher

  • The intrahippocampal kainate model of temporal lobe epilepsy revisited: Epileptogenesis, behavioral and cognitive alterations, pharmacological response, and hippoccampal damage in epileptic rats

    Marta Rattka;Claudia Brandt;Wolfgang Löscher

  • Delayed Sclerosis, Neuroprotection, and Limbic Epileptogenesis After Status Epilepticus in the Rat

    Ulrich Ebert;Claudia Brandt;Wolfgang Löscher

  • Effective termination of status epilepticus by rational polypharmacy in the lithium-pilocarpine model in rats: Window of opportunity to prevent epilepsy and prediction of epilepsy by biomarkers.

    Claudia Brandt;Kathrin Töllner;Rebecca Klee;Sonja Bröer

  • Striking differences in individual anticonvulsant response to phenobarbital in rats with spontaneous seizures after status epilepticus.

    Claudia Brandt;Holger A Volk;Wolfgang Löscher

  • Prophylactic treatment with levetiracetam after status epilepticus: lack of effect on epileptogenesis, neuronal damage, and behavioral alterations in rats.

    Claudia Brandt;Maike Glien;Alexandra M. Gastens;Maren Fedrowitz

  • Significant effects of sex, strain, and anesthesia in the intrahippocampal kainate mouse model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Friederike Twele;Kathrin Töllner;Claudia Brandt;Wolfgang Löscher

  • Effects of the novel antiepileptic drug lacosamide on the development of amygdala kindling in rats.

    Claudia Brandt;Anna Heile;Heidrun Potschka;Thomas Stoehr

  • Enhanced susceptibility to the GABA antagonist pentylenetetrazole during the latent period following a pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in rats.

    Marta Rattka;Claudia Brandt;Marion Bankstahl;Sonja Bröer

Frequent Co-Authors

Heidrun Potschka
Heidrun Potschka Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolfgang Löscher
Wolfgang Löscher University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Ulrich Ebert
Ulrich Ebert University of Tübingen
Alon Friedman
Alon Friedman Dalhousie University
Kai Kaila
Kai Kaila University of Helsinki
Tobias M. Boeckers
Tobias M. Boeckers University of Ulm
Jean-Marc Fritschy
Jean-Marc Fritschy University of Zurich
Ilse Smolders
Ilse Smolders Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Malek Bajbouj
Malek Bajbouj Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Annamaria Vezzani
Annamaria Vezzani Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Claudia Brandt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles