World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
6950
World Ranking
6753
National Ranking
569

Ulrich Ebert publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Ebert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 101 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ulrich Ebert D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Ebert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Ebert is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their academic profile includes contributions to scientific research, though specific publication details, research topics, and fields of study have not been provided.

No recent papers or details on frequent co-authors have been documented. Similarly, information on regular publication venues or book publications is not available, limiting insight into the scope and focus of their academic output.

There is no recorded data on main fields or subfields of study related to their research activities. Likewise, there are no details about primary research topics or thematic areas addressed within their work.

No awards or recognitions have been listed for Ulrich Ebert, and there are no indications that the scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • The role of the piriform cortex in kindling.

    Wolfgang Löscher;Ulrich Ebert

  • Amyloid β Oligomers (Aβ1–42 Globulomer) Suppress Spontaneous Synaptic Activity by Inhibition of P/Q-Type Calcium Currents

    Volker Nimmrich;Christiane Grimm;Andreas Draguhn;Stefan Barghorn

  • N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor blockade after status epilepticus protects against limbic brain damage but not against epilepsy in the kainate model of temporal lobe epilepsy

    C Brandt;H Potschka;W Löscher;U Ebert

  • Repeated low-dose treatment of rats with pilocarpine: low mortality but high proportion of rats developing epilepsy.

    Maike Glien;Claudia Brandt;Heidrun Potschka;Henning Voigt

  • Reduced spine density in specific regions of CA1 pyramidal neurons in two transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease.

    Claudia Perez-Cruz;Marc W. Nolte;Marcel M. van Gaalen;Nathan R. Rustay

  • Seizure suppression in kindling epilepsy by grafts of fetal GABAergic neurons in rat substantia nigra.

    Wolfgang Löscher;Ulrich Ebert;Holger Lehmann;Christoph Rosenthal

  • Changes in 5-HT1A and NMDA binding sites by a single rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation procedure in rats

    Maarten H.P. Kole;Eberhard Fuchs;Ulf Ziemann;Walter Paulus

  • Generation and therapeutic efficacy of highly oligomer-specific beta-amyloid antibodies.

    Heinz Hillen;Stefan Barghorn;Andreas Striebinger;Boris Labkovsky

  • Epilepsy induced by extended amygdala-kindling in rats: lack of clear association between development of spontaneous seizures and neuronal damage.

    C. Brandt;U. Ebert;W. Löscher

  • Lehrbuch der Pharmakologie und Toxikologie für die Veterinärmedizin

    Wolfgang Löscher;Angelika Richter;Getu Abraham;Hermann Ammer

  • Anticonvulsant effects of melatonin in amygdala-kindled rats

    Meike Mevissen;Ulrich Ebert

  • Delayed Sclerosis, Neuroprotection, and Limbic Epileptogenesis After Status Epilepticus in the Rat

    Ulrich Ebert;Claudia Brandt;Wolfgang Löscher

  • Enhancement of the acoustic startle response by stimulation of an excitatory pathway from the central amygdala/basal nucleus of Meynert to the pontine reticular formation.

    Michael Koch;Ulrich Ebert

  • Susceptibility of different cell layers of the anterior and posterior part of the piriform cortex to electrical stimulation and kindling: comparison with the basolateral amygdala and “area tempestas”

    W. Löscher;U. Ebert;U. Wahnschaffe;C. Rundfeldt

  • Kindling-induced overexpression of Homer 1A and its functional implications for epileptogenesis.

    H. Potschka;E. Krupp;U. Ebert;C. Gümbel

  • Is Alzheimer's Disease a Result of Presynaptic Failure? - Synaptic Dysfunctions Induced by Oligomeric β-Amyloid

    Unknown

  • Anticonvulsant efficacy of gabapentin and levetiracetam in phenytoin-resistant kindled rats

    Wolfgang Löscher;Elke Reissmüller;Ulrich Ebert

  • Characterization of 7- and 19-month-old Tg2576 mice using multimodal in vivo imaging: limitations as a translatable model of Alzheimer's disease

    Feng Luo;Nathan R. Rustay;Ulrich Ebert;Vincent P. Hradil

  • Serotonin modulates auditory information processing in the cochlear nucleus of the rat

    Ulrich Ebert;Joachim Ostwald

  • Immunocytochemical localization of GABA immunoreactivity in dentate granule cells of normal and kindled rats

    Holger Lehmann;Ulrich Ebert;Wolfgang Löscher

  • The central piriform cortex: anatomical connections and anticonvulsant effect of gaba elevation in the kindling model

    K Schwabe;U Ebert;W Löscher

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Löscher
Wolfgang Löscher University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Heidrun Potschka
Heidrun Potschka Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Claudia Brandt
Claudia Brandt University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Michael Koch
Michael Koch University of Bremen
Paul F. Worley
Paul F. Worley Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Maarten H.P. Kole
Maarten H.P. Kole Utrecht University
Eberhard Fuchs
Eberhard Fuchs German Primate Center
Walter Paulus
Walter Paulus University of Göttingen
Guido Nikkhah
Guido Nikkhah University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Ebert