World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cornelius J. König

Cornelius J. König

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
8801
World Ranking
7202
National Ranking
342

Cornelius J. König publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelius J. König sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 199 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Cornelius J. König D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelius J. König sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cornelius J. König is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany and focuses on research within the social sciences, psychology, and business, management, and accounting. Their work extensively covers topics related to organizational behavior and human resource management, social psychology, and the ethics and social impacts of artificial intelligence.

The scientist frequently publishes on themes including job satisfaction and organizational behavior, corporate management and leadership, social and intergroup psychology, personality traits, psychology coaching and therapy, and sociology and education studies.

Among their recent papers are:

  • What to expect from opening up 'black boxes'? Comparing perceptions of justice between human and automated agents (2021, Computers in Human Behavior)
  • Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Trust Processes Between Human and Automated Trustees in Light of Unfair Bias (2022, Journal of Business and Psychology)
  • Picking with a robot colleague: A systematic literature review and evaluation of technology acceptance in human-robot collaborative warehouses (2023, Computers & Industrial Engineering)
  • Introducing a multi-stakeholder perspective on opacity, transparency and strategies to reduce opacity in algorithm-based human resource management (2021, Human Resource Management Review)
  • Changing the means of managerial work: effects of automated decision support systems on personnel selection tasks (2020, Journal of Business and Psychology)

Cornelius J. König has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, notably Markus Langer with 26 joint publications, Nida ul Habib Bajwa with 20, Denise Vesper with 10, Rudolf Siegel with 7, and Mario Gollwitzer with 5.

The scientist publishes frequently in several venues, including the International Journal of Selection and Assessment and Psychologische Rundschau, each with seven publications, followed by the Journal of Business and Psychology with four, and both the Journal of Personnel Psychology and the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology with three each.

In addition to journal articles, König has contributed to book publications with Springer Nature, including titles such as Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie im 21. Jahrhundert (2021) and Karriereperspektiven in der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2022).

Their research spans the subfields of organizational behavior and human resource management, sociology and political science, social psychology, general health professions, and clinical psychology, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach within social sciences and psychology.

Best Publications

  • Integrating Theories of Motivation

    Piers Steel;Cornelius J. König

  • A model for the effects of job insecurity on performance, turnover intention, and absenteeism

    Thomas Staufenbiel;Cornelius J. König

  • The Effects of Job Insecurity on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Deviant Behavior, and Negative Emotions of Employees

    William D. Reisel;Tahira M. Probst;Swee-Lim Chia;Cesar M. Maloles

  • Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are Not

    Cornelius J. Konig;Markus Buhner;Gesine Murling

  • Personnel Selection as a Signaling Game

    Adrian Bangerter;Nicolas Roulin;Cornelius J. König

  • Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures

    Cornelius J. König;Ute-Christine Klehe;Matthias Berchtold;Martin Kleinmann

  • Working Memory Dimensions as Differential Predictors of the Speed and Error Aspect of Multitasking Performance

    Markus Bühner;Cornelius J. König;Marion Pick;Stefan Krumm

  • Catch me if I fall! Enacted uncertainty avoidance and the social safety net as country-level moderators in the job insecurity-job attitudes link.

    Maike E. Debus;Tahira M. Probst;Cornelius J. König;Martin Kleinmann

  • Time for Reflection: A Critical Examination of Polychronicity

    Cornelius J. König;Mary J. Waller

  • Examining digital interviews for personnel selection: Applicant reactions and interviewer ratings

    Markus Langer;Cornelius J. König;Kevin Krause

  • Examining occupational self-efficacy, work locus of control and communication as moderators of the job insecurity--job performance relationship

    Cornelius J König;Maike E Debus;Stéphanie Häusler;Nora Lendenmann

  • Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes

    Markus Langer;Cornelius J. König;Maria Papathanasiou

  • A different look at why selection procedures work: The role of candidates’ ability to identify criteria

    Martin Kleinmann;Pia V. Ingold;Filip Lievens;Anne Jansen

  • Exploring the positive side of personal internet use at work: Does it help in managing the border between work and nonwork?

    Cornelius J. König;Mariette E. Caner De La Guardia

  • International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection

    Brett Myors;Filip Lievens;Eveline Schollaert;Greet Van Hoye

  • Situation assessment as an ignored factor in the behavioral consistency paradigm underlying the validity of personnel selection procedures.

    Anne Jansen;Klaus G. Melchers;Filip Lievens;Martin Kleinmann

  • How and why do interviewers try to make impressions on applicants? A qualitative study.

    Annika Wilhelmy;Martin Kleinmann;Cornelius J. König;Klaus G. Melchers

  • Information as a double-edged sword: The role of computer experience and information on applicant reactions towards novel technologies for personnel selection

    Markus Langer;Cornelius J. König;Andromachi Fitili

  • Transparency in Structured Interviews: Consequences for Construct and Criterion-Related Validity

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Cornelius J. König;Gerald M. Richter;Martin Kleinmann

  • Candidates' Ability to Identify Criteria in Nontransparent Selection Procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview

    Cornelius J. König;Klaus G. Melchers;Martin Kleinmann;Gerald M. Richter

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Kleinmann
Martin Kleinmann University of Zurich
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Markus Bühner
Markus Bühner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ute-Christine Klehe
Ute-Christine Klehe University of Giessen
Marise Ph. Born
Marise Ph. Born Erasmus University Rotterdam
Birgit Spinath
Birgit Spinath Heidelberg University
Thomas Fydrich
Thomas Fydrich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Edgar Erdfelder
Edgar Erdfelder University of Mannheim
Mario Gollwitzer
Mario Gollwitzer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, there are related online degrees and career paths that can enhance your professional options. Social work is a particularly popular pathway, giving graduates opportunities in counseling, case management, and community service roles.

The rise of online education means you can find many affordable degree options. For example, those interested in practicing in the South may want to explore affordable online social work programs in Tennessee or check out the cheapest social work programs in Arkansas for cost-effective opportunities. If you are located in Georgia, consider researching affordable social work degrees in Atlanta.

There are also excellent pathways throughout the Southwest, including some of the cheapest social work programs in Arizona. Exploring these programs can help you launch a rewarding career in mental health, advocacy, or social services—often from the flexibility of your own home.

Best Scientists Citing Cornelius J. König

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles