World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
127403
World Ranking
7675
National Ranking
369

Edgar Erdfelder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edgar Erdfelder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edgar Erdfelder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edgar Erdfelder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edgar Erdfelder is affiliated with the University of Mannheim in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a specialized emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. Their scholarly output spans related subfields including education, experimental and cognitive psychology, statistics and probability, and social psychology.

The main topics of Edgar Erdfelder's work explore multiple aspects of memory and neural processes. Key subjects include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Edgar Erdfelder has published in several academic venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Psychologische Rundschau
  • Psychological Methods
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Mathematical Psychology
  • Psychological Bulletin

Recent publications by Edgar Erdfelder include:

  • The sleep benefit in episodic memory: An integrative review and a meta-analysis. (2021) Psychological Bulletin
  • How to develop, test, and extend multinomial processing tree models: A tutorial. (2023) Psychological Methods
  • How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm. (2020) Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Adaptive Memory: Independent Effects of Survival Processing and Reward Motivation on Memory. (2020) Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Survival processing modulates the neurocognitive mechanisms of episodic encoding. (2020) Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience

Collaborations are a consistent feature in Edgar Erdfelder's career, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Daniel W. Heck
  • Meike Kroneisen
  • Siri-Maria Kamp
  • Martin Schnuerch
  • Conny H. Antoni

Best Publications

  • G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

    Franz Faul;Edgar Erdfelder;Albert Georg Lang;Axel Buchner

  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

    Franz Faul;Edgar Erdfelder;Axel Buchner;Albert-Georg Lang

  • GPOWER: A general power analysis program

    Edgar Erdfelder;Franz Faul;Axel Buchner

  • GPOWER: a priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer Program]

    F Faul;E Erdfelder

  • A short tutorial of GPower

    Susanne Mayr;Edgar Erdfelder;Axel Buchner;Franz Faul

  • Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring.

    Ute J. Bayen;Kevin Murnane;Edgar Erdfelder

  • Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature.

    Edgar Erdfelder;Tina-Sarah Auer;Benjamin E. Hilbig;André Aßfalg

  • Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework

    Axel Buchner;Edgar Erdfelder;Bianca Vaterrodt-Plünnecke

  • A New Strategy for Testing Structural Equation Models

    Morten Moshagen;Edgar Erdfelder

  • On the plasticity of the survival processing effect.

    Meike Kroneisen;Edgar Erdfelder

  • Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight.

    Edgar Erdfelder;Axel Buchner

  • Hindsight Bias from 3 to 95 Years of Age

    Daniel M. Bernstein;Edgar Erdfelder;Andrew N. Meltzoff;William Peria

  • The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency

    Monika Undorf;Edgar Erdfelder

  • On the Irrelevance of Semantic Information for the llIrrelevant Speech Effect

    Axel Buchner;Lisa Irmen;Edgar Erdfelder

  • Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency : conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis

    Monika Undorf;Edgar Erdfelder

  • Hindsight bias in political elections

    Hartmut Blank;Volkhard Fischer;Edgar Erdfelder

  • Comment: Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory?

    Edgar Erdfelder;Axel Buchner

  • The abstract selection task: new data and an almost comprehensive model.

    Karl Christoph Klauer;Christoph Stahl;Edgar Erdfelder

  • One-Reason Decision Making Unveiled: A Measurement Model of the Recognition Heuristic.

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Edgar Erdfelder;Rüdiger F. Pohl

  • Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes

    Daniel W. Heck;Edgar Erdfelder

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel M. Bernstein
Daniel M. Bernstein Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Axel Buchner
Axel Buchner Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Benjamin E. Hilbig
Benjamin E. Hilbig University of Koblenz and Landau
Morten Moshagen
Morten Moshagen University of Ulm
Mario Gollwitzer
Mario Gollwitzer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Markus Bühner
Markus Bühner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Birgit Spinath
Birgit Spinath Heidelberg University
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Thomas Fydrich
Thomas Fydrich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a diverse array of academic options and career pathways. If you’re interested in the intersection of psychology and law, it’s helpful to understand what jobs can you get with criminal psychology. Careers may include roles in law enforcement agencies, court systems, corrections, or private consulting.

Deciding between specialized graduate degrees is also important. Learn about the differences between a master’s in psychology, a master’s in counseling, and a master’s in social work by reading masters in counseling vs social work. Each track has unique coursework and leads to distinct professional licenses and positions.

Online programs offer flexibility for students at every level. You can find options for an easy online psychology degree to simplify your academic journey without compromising on quality. Alternatively, if you want to finish your master’s quickly, consider enrolling in one of the accelerated master's in psychology programs, which are designed for faster completion. Each route can lead to rewarding careers in mental health, education, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Edgar Erdfelder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles