World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 48 6139 5654 2682 2419 235 10666

Claudia M. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudia M. Campbell between 1987 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudia M. Campbell published across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2019. 20 of the 276 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2019. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
1987 2026

276 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudia M. Campbell: publications per year, 1987 to 2026
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 4
2005 10
2006 6
2007 2
2008 10
2009 12
2010 9
2011 9
2012 16
2013 12
2014 13
2015 13
2016 14
2017 15
2018 13
2019 22
2020 14
2021 10
2022 19
2023 18
2024 14
2025 19
2026 1
Total 276
Download as CSV

Claudia M. Campbell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 235 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220 235
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudia M. Campbell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 48
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Claudia M. Campbell is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on several subfields including Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Physiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to pain and related disorders, including:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Pain mechanisms and treatments
  • Sleep and wakefulness research
  • Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research
  • Osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms
  • Opioid use disorder treatment

Frequent publication venues for Claudia M. Campbell include:

  • Journal of Pain
  • Pain Medicine
  • Pain
  • SLEEP
  • Value in Health

Recent papers authored by or associated with the scientist demonstrate a consistent focus on pain research, racial aspects within this field, and the impact of external factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable recent works include:

  • Confronting Racism in Pain Research: A Call to Action, 2022, Journal of Pain
  • Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: Reframing Study Designs, 2022, Journal of Pain
  • The Early Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Pain: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of a Large Online Sample of Individuals with Chronic Pain in the United States, April to May, 2020, Pain Medicine
  • Multimodal prediction of pain and functional outcomes 6 months following total knee replacement: a prospective cohort study, 2022, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: A Shared Commitment for Engagement, Diversity, and Dissemination, 2022, Journal of Pain

Claudia M. Campbell's frequent co-authors include Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite, Chung Jung Mun, Michael T. Smith, Patrick H. Finan, and Rachel V. Aaron. Collaborations with these individuals indicate active engagement in research related to pain, its mechanisms, and treatment.

Best Publications

  • Pain catastrophizing: a critical review

    Phillip J Quartana;Claudia M Campbell;Robert R Edwards

  • Ethnic differences in pain and pain management.

    Claudia M Campbell;Robert R Edwards

  • Discordance between pain and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis: Findings from quantitative sensory testing of central sensitization

    Patrick H. Finan;Luis F. Buenaver;Sara C. Bounds;Shahid Hussain

  • Sex-Based Differences in Pain Perception and Treatment

    Channing J. Paller;Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Adrian S. Dobs

  • The A118G single nucleotide polymorphism of the μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) is associated with pressure pain sensitivity in humans

    Roger B. Fillingim;Roger B. Fillingim;Lee Kaplan;Roland Staud;Timothy J. Ness

  • Ethnic differences in responses to multiple experimental pain stimuli.

    Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Roger B. Fillingim

  • Ethnic identity predicts experimental pain sensitivity in African Americans and Hispanics.

    F. Bridgett Rahim-Williams;Joseph L. Riley;Dyanne Herrera;Claudia M. Campbell

  • Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis

    Asbjørn M Drewes;Stefan A. W. Bouwense;Claudia M Campbell;Güralp O Ceyhan

  • Mind–body interactions in pain: the neurophysiology of anxious and catastrophic pain-related thoughts

    Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Robert R. Edwards

  • Sleep, Pain Catastrophizing, and Central Sensitization in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients With and Without Insomnia

    Claudia M. Campbell;Luis F. Buenaver;Patrick Finan;Sara C. Bounds

  • Morphine responses and experimental pain: sex differences in side effects and cardiovascular responses but not analgesia.

    Roger B. Fillingim;Roger B. Fillingim;Timothy J. Ness;Toni L. Glover;Claudia M. Campbell

  • Situational Versus Dispositional Measurement of Catastrophizing: Associations With Pain Responses in Multiple Samples

    Claudia M. Campbell;Tarek Kronfli;Luis F. Buenaver;Michael T. Smith

  • Randomized control trial of topical clonidine for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.

    Claudia M. Campbell;Mark S. Kipnes;Bruce C. Stouch;Kerrie L. Brady

  • Cluster analysis of multiple experimental pain modalities.

    Barbara A. Hastie;Joseph L. Riley;Michael E. Robinson;Toni Glover

  • Alteration in Pain Modulation in Women With Persistent Pain After Lumpectomy: Influence of Catastrophizing

    Robert R. Edwards;George Mensing;Christine Cahalan;Seth Greenbaum

  • Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: clinically relevant or extraneous research phenomenon?

    D. Andrew Tompkins;Claudia M. Campbell

  • Pain sensitivity and vasopressin analgesia are mediated by a gene-sex-environment interaction

    Jeffrey S. Mogil;Robert E. Sorge;Michael L. Lacroix-Fralish;Shad B. Smith

  • Ethnic differences in diffuse noxious inhibitory controls.

    Claudia M. Campbell;Michael E. Robinson;Henrietta L. Logan

  • Polymorphisms in the GTP cyclohydrolase gene (GCH1) are associated with ratings of capsaicin pain

    Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Robert R. Edwards;Cheryl Carmona;Magdalena Uhart

  • Pain modality- and sex-specific effects of COMT genetic functional variants.

    Inna Belfer;Samantha K. Segall;William R. Lariviere;Shad B. Smith

  • Distraction analgesia in chronic pain patients: the impact of catastrophizing.

    Kristin L. Schreiber;Claudia Campbell;Claudia Campbell;Marc O. Martel;Seth Greenbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert R. Edwards
Robert R. Edwards Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael T. Smith
Michael T. Smith Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Roger B. Fillingim
Roger B. Fillingim University of Florida
Michael W. Smith
Michael W. Smith Johns Hopkins University
Roland Staud
Roland Staud University of Florida
James N. Campbell
James N. Campbell Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael E. Robinson
Michael E. Robinson University of Florida
Joel D. Greenspan
Joel D. Greenspan University of Maryland, Baltimore
Margaret R. Wallace
Margaret R. Wallace University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields through online study can expand your career opportunities in neuroscience and other behavioral sciences. Many students supplement their neuroscience background with online certifications that pay well, such as those in data science, healthcare management, or clinical research, to boost their employability and earning potential.

For those seeking less intensive options, looking into the easy university degrees and majors online can be a practical way to build foundational knowledge or transition into new roles, especially for busy professionals or recent graduates.

If you’re interested in a career supporting mental health, fields such as social work and behavioral analysis pair well with neuroscience backgrounds. Check options like affordable msw programs online for social work or pursue a bcba degree online for applied behavior analysis. Both paths offer flexibility and cost-effective routes to licensure and professional practice.

By strategically choosing related online degrees and certificates, you can personalize your academic journey, save on tuition, and create diverse career pathways within and beyond neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia M. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles