World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
10666
World Ranking
6139
National Ranking
2682

Claudia M. Campbell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 235 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Claudia M. Campbell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudia M. Campbell is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on several subfields including Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Physiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to pain and related disorders, including:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Pain mechanisms and treatments
  • Sleep and wakefulness research
  • Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research
  • Osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms
  • Opioid use disorder treatment

Frequent publication venues for Claudia M. Campbell include:

  • Journal of Pain
  • Pain Medicine
  • Pain
  • SLEEP
  • Value in Health

Recent papers authored by or associated with the scientist demonstrate a consistent focus on pain research, racial aspects within this field, and the impact of external factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable recent works include:

  • Confronting Racism in Pain Research: A Call to Action, 2022, Journal of Pain
  • Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: Reframing Study Designs, 2022, Journal of Pain
  • The Early Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Pain: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of a Large Online Sample of Individuals with Chronic Pain in the United States, April to May, 2020, Pain Medicine
  • Multimodal prediction of pain and functional outcomes 6 months following total knee replacement: a prospective cohort study, 2022, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: A Shared Commitment for Engagement, Diversity, and Dissemination, 2022, Journal of Pain

Claudia M. Campbell's frequent co-authors include Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite, Chung Jung Mun, Michael T. Smith, Patrick H. Finan, and Rachel V. Aaron. Collaborations with these individuals indicate active engagement in research related to pain, its mechanisms, and treatment.

Best Publications

  • Pain catastrophizing: a critical review

    Phillip J Quartana;Claudia M Campbell;Robert R Edwards

  • Ethnic differences in pain and pain management.

    Claudia M Campbell;Robert R Edwards

  • Discordance between pain and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis: Findings from quantitative sensory testing of central sensitization

    Patrick H. Finan;Luis F. Buenaver;Sara C. Bounds;Shahid Hussain

  • Sex-Based Differences in Pain Perception and Treatment

    Channing J. Paller;Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Adrian S. Dobs

  • The A118G single nucleotide polymorphism of the μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) is associated with pressure pain sensitivity in humans

    Roger B. Fillingim;Roger B. Fillingim;Lee Kaplan;Roland Staud;Timothy J. Ness

  • Ethnic differences in responses to multiple experimental pain stimuli.

    Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Roger B. Fillingim

  • Ethnic identity predicts experimental pain sensitivity in African Americans and Hispanics.

    F. Bridgett Rahim-Williams;Joseph L. Riley;Dyanne Herrera;Claudia M. Campbell

  • Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis

    Asbjørn M Drewes;Stefan A. W. Bouwense;Claudia M Campbell;Güralp O Ceyhan

  • Mind–body interactions in pain: the neurophysiology of anxious and catastrophic pain-related thoughts

    Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Robert R. Edwards

  • Sleep, Pain Catastrophizing, and Central Sensitization in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients With and Without Insomnia

    Claudia M. Campbell;Luis F. Buenaver;Patrick Finan;Sara C. Bounds

  • Morphine responses and experimental pain: sex differences in side effects and cardiovascular responses but not analgesia.

    Roger B. Fillingim;Roger B. Fillingim;Timothy J. Ness;Toni L. Glover;Claudia M. Campbell

  • Situational Versus Dispositional Measurement of Catastrophizing: Associations With Pain Responses in Multiple Samples

    Claudia M. Campbell;Tarek Kronfli;Luis F. Buenaver;Michael T. Smith

  • Randomized control trial of topical clonidine for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.

    Claudia M. Campbell;Mark S. Kipnes;Bruce C. Stouch;Kerrie L. Brady

  • Cluster analysis of multiple experimental pain modalities.

    Barbara A. Hastie;Joseph L. Riley;Michael E. Robinson;Toni Glover

  • Alteration in Pain Modulation in Women With Persistent Pain After Lumpectomy: Influence of Catastrophizing

    Robert R. Edwards;George Mensing;Christine Cahalan;Seth Greenbaum

  • Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: clinically relevant or extraneous research phenomenon?

    D. Andrew Tompkins;Claudia M. Campbell

  • Pain sensitivity and vasopressin analgesia are mediated by a gene-sex-environment interaction

    Jeffrey S. Mogil;Robert E. Sorge;Michael L. Lacroix-Fralish;Shad B. Smith

  • Ethnic differences in diffuse noxious inhibitory controls.

    Claudia M. Campbell;Michael E. Robinson;Henrietta L. Logan

  • Polymorphisms in the GTP cyclohydrolase gene (GCH1) are associated with ratings of capsaicin pain

    Claudia M. Campbell;Robert R. Edwards;Robert R. Edwards;Cheryl Carmona;Magdalena Uhart

  • Pain modality- and sex-specific effects of COMT genetic functional variants.

    Inna Belfer;Samantha K. Segall;William R. Lariviere;Shad B. Smith

  • Distraction analgesia in chronic pain patients: the impact of catastrophizing.

    Kristin L. Schreiber;Claudia Campbell;Claudia Campbell;Marc O. Martel;Seth Greenbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert R. Edwards
Robert R. Edwards Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael T. Smith
Michael T. Smith Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Roger B. Fillingim
Roger B. Fillingim University of Florida
Michael W. Smith
Michael W. Smith Johns Hopkins University
Roland Staud
Roland Staud University of Florida
James N. Campbell
James N. Campbell Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael E. Robinson
Michael E. Robinson University of Florida
Joel D. Greenspan
Joel D. Greenspan University of Maryland, Baltimore
Margaret R. Wallace
Margaret R. Wallace University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields through online study can expand your career opportunities in neuroscience and other behavioral sciences. Many students supplement their neuroscience background with online certifications that pay well, such as those in data science, healthcare management, or clinical research, to boost their employability and earning potential.

For those seeking less intensive options, looking into the easy university degrees and majors online can be a practical way to build foundational knowledge or transition into new roles, especially for busy professionals or recent graduates.

If you’re interested in a career supporting mental health, fields such as social work and behavioral analysis pair well with neuroscience backgrounds. Check options like affordable msw programs online for social work or pursue a bcba degree online for applied behavior analysis. Both paths offer flexibility and cost-effective routes to licensure and professional practice.

By strategically choosing related online degrees and certificates, you can personalize your academic journey, save on tuition, and create diverse career pathways within and beyond neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia M. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles