World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William Maixner

William Maixner

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 7039 3700 387 40526

William Maixner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William Maixner between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William Maixner published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2011. 2 of the 392 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2011. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 9 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1976 2025

392 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William Maixner: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 2
1978 3
1979 1
1980 2
1981 6
1982 6
1983 3
1984 6
1985 2
1986 6
1987 1
1988 0
1989 3
1990 5
1991 4
1992 12
1993 6
1994 1
1995 9
1996 3
1997 10
1998 7
1999 13
2000 4
2001 7
2002 5
2003 4
2004 4
2005 14
2006 17
2007 13
2008 12
2009 11
2010 11
2011 25
2012 15
2013 20
2014 17
2015 19
2016 10
2017 24
2018 8
2019 11
2020 13
2021 12
2022 1
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 392
Download as CSV

William Maixner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Maixner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 387 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 387
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

William Maixner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Maixner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William Maixner was affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research career focused primarily on medicine, with a particular emphasis on physiology, molecular biology, psychiatry and mental health, complementary and manual therapy, and pharmacology.

Their work extensively covered several main research topics, including:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling

William Maixner contributed to a variety of scholarly publications, with a significant number of papers published in venues such as UNC Libraries, Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache, Pain, Comprehensive Physiology, and the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

Recent notable papers from their research included:

  • "Central Nervous System Targets: Glial Cell Mechanisms in Chronic Pain," 2020, Neurotherapeutics
  • "STING controls nociception via type I interferon signalling in sensory neurons," 2021, Nature
  • "Anatomical and clinical implications of vagal modulation of the spleen," 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Associations of Psychologic Factors with Multiple Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions," 2020, Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
  • "Baroreceptor Modulation of the Cardiovascular System, Pain, Consciousness, and Cognition," 2021, Comprehensive Physiology

The scientist worked frequently with several collaborators, including:

  • Luda Diatchenko
  • Roger B. Fillingim
  • Gary D. Slade
  • Richard Ohrbach
  • Joel D. Greenspan

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†

    Eric L Schiffman;Richard Ohrbach;Edmond Truelove;John O Look

  • Genetic basis for individual variations in pain perception and the development of a chronic pain condition

    Luda Diatchenko;Gary D. Slade;Andrea G. Nackley;Konakporn Bhalang

  • Neuroinflammation and Central Sensitization in Chronic and Widespread Pain

    Ru-Rong Ji;Andrea Nackley;Yul Huh;Niccolò Terrando

  • Human Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Haplotypes Modulate Protein Expression by Altering mRNA Secondary Structure

    A. G. Nackley;S. A. Shabalina;I. E. Tchivileva;K. Satterfield

  • Painful Temporomandibular Disorder Decade of Discovery from OPPERA Studies

    G.D. Slade;R. Ohrbach;J.D. Greenspan;R.B. Fillingim

  • Gender differences in the responses to noxious stimuli

    Roger B. Fillingim;William Maixner

  • GTP cyclohydrolase and tetrahydrobiopterin regulate pain sensitivity and persistence

    Irmgard Tegeder;Michael Costigan;Robert S Griffin;Andrea Abele

  • Psychological Factors Associated With Development of TMD: The OPPERA Prospective Cohort Study

    Roger B. Fillingim;Richard Ohrbach;Joel D. Greenspan;Charles Knott

  • Interactions Between Cardiovascular and Pain Regulatory Systems

    Alan Randich;William Maixner

  • Orofacial Pain Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment Study – The OPPERA Study

    William Maixner;Luda Diatchenko;Ronald Dubner;Roger B. Fillingim

  • Idiopathic pain disorders--pathways of vulnerability.

    Luda Diatchenko;Andrea G. Nackley;Gary D. Slade;Roger B. Fillingim

  • Clinical Findings and Pain Symptoms as Potential Risk Factors for Chronic TMD: Descriptive Data and Empirically Identified Domains from the OPPERA Case-Control Study

    Richard Ohrbach;Roger B. Fillingim;Flora Mulkey;Yoly Gonzalez

  • Sensitivity of patients with painful temporomandibular disorders to experimentally evoked pain

    William Maixner;Roger Fillingim;Donna Booker;Asgeir Sigurdsson

  • Sensitivity of patients with painful temporomandibular disorders to experimentally evoked pain: evidence for altered temporal summation of pain

    William Maixner;Roger Fillingim;Asgeir Sigurdsson;Shelley Kincaid

  • Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphisms are associated with multiple pain-evoking stimuli

    Luda Diatchenko;Andrea G. Nackley;Gary D. Slade;Kanokporn Bhalang

  • Genetically determined P2X7 receptor pore formation regulates variability in chronic pain sensitivity.

    Robert E. Sorge;Tuan Trang;Ruslan Dorfman;Shad B. Smith

  • Overlapping Chronic Pain Conditions: Implications for Diagnosis and Classification.

    William Maixner;William Maixner;Roger B. Fillingim;David A. Williams;Shad B. Smith;Shad B. Smith

  • Potential Autonomic Risk Factors for Chronic TMD: Descriptive Data and Empirically Identified Domains from the OPPERA Case-Control Study

    Roger B. Fillingim;Richard Ohrbach;Joel D. Greenspan;Charles Knott

  • Pain perception is altered by a nucleotide polymorphism in SCN9A

    Frank Reimann;James J. Cox;Inna Belfer;Luda Diatchenko

  • Sex differences in temporal summation but not sensory-discriminative processing of thermal pain

    Roger B Fillingim;William Maixner;Shelley Kincaid;Stefanie Silva

Frequent Co-Authors

Luda Diatchenko
Luda Diatchenko McGill University
Roger B. Fillingim
Roger B. Fillingim University of Florida
Gary D. Slade
Gary D. Slade University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joel D. Greenspan
Joel D. Greenspan University of Maryland, Baltimore
Kathleen C. Light
Kathleen C. Light University of Utah
Susan S. Girdler
Susan S. Girdler University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jeffrey S. Mogil
Jeffrey S. Mogil McGill University
Nikolay V. Dokholyan
Nikolay V. Dokholyan Pennsylvania State University
Ronald Dubner
Ronald Dubner University of Maryland, Baltimore
David Goldman
David Goldman National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medicine but exploring alternative or complementary paths, a range of online healthcare degrees can help you launch or advance your career. Fast-paced and flexible options allow many students to balance education with work or family commitments.

For those looking to quickly enter the nursing field, a 6 month lpn program online can provide a direct pathway to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time than traditional routes. If you’re already a nurse aiming to specialize, pursuing the fastest post master's pmhnp program helps you earn credentials as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner efficiently.

For those interested in medical administration, you can find the cheapest mha programs online to keep costs manageable. Additionally, selecting the most affordable mha programs offers another strategic way to advance into healthcare leadership roles without overwhelming debt.

These online degrees provide diverse entry points and specializations across the medical field. They can help you move toward your career goals in healthcare, no matter your starting point.

Best Scientists Citing William Maixner

Recently Published Articles