World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
60094
World Ranking
3716
National Ranking
2046

Daniel J. Clauw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Clauw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 629 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel J. Clauw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Clauw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel J. Clauw is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pharmacology, Physiology, Rheumatology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work concentrates on specific topics within chronic pain and related conditions. These main topics include:

  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Myofascial Pain Diagnosis and Treatment

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated with Daniel J. Clauw, including:

  • Steven E. Harte
  • David A. Williams
  • Andrew Schrepf
  • Richard E. Harris
  • Chelsea Kaplan

The scientist has published extensively in various journals, with frequent publication venues being:

  • Pain
  • Journal of Pain
  • Pain Medicine
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Arthritis Care & Research

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Daniel J. Clauw are:

  • "Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions" (2021, The Lancet)
  • "Chronic nociplastic pain affecting the musculoskeletal system: clinical criteria and grading system" (2021, Pain)
  • "Central sensitisation in chronic pain conditions: latest discoveries and their potential for precision medicine" (2021, The Lancet Rheumatology)
  • "Considering the potential for an increase in chronic pain after the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020, Pain)
  • "Lorecivivint, a Novel Intraarticular CDC-like Kinase 2 and Dual-Specificity Tyrosine Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase 1A Inhibitor and Wnt Pathway Modulator for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase II Randomized Trial" (2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology)

Best Publications

  • The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity.

    Frederick Wolfe;Daniel J. Clauw;Mary Ann Fitzcharles;Don L. Goldenberg

  • Fibromyalgia: A clinical review

    Daniel J. Clauw

  • 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria

    Frederick Wolfe;Daniel J. Clauw;Mary Ann Fitzcharles;Don L. Goldenberg;Don L. Goldenberg

  • Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia

    Frederick Wolfe;Daniel J. Clauw;Mary Ann Fitzcharles;Don L. Goldenberg

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia

    Richard H. Gracely;Richard H. Gracely;Frank Petzke;Julie M. Wolf;Daniel J. Clauw;Daniel J. Clauw

  • Pain catastrophizing and neural responses to pain among persons with fibromyalgia

    R. H. Gracely;M. E. Geisser;T. Giesecke;M. A.B. Grant

  • Evidence of Augmented Central Pain Processing in Idiopathic Chronic Low Back Pain

    Thorsten Giesecke;Richard H. Gracely;Masilo A. B. Grant;Alf Nachemson;Alf Nachemson

  • Intrinsic Brain Connectivity in Fibromyalgia is Associated with Chronic Pain Intensity

    Vitaly J. Napadow;Lauren LaCount;Kyungmo Park;Sawsan As-Sanie

  • Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions

    Mary Ann Fitzcharles;Steven P. Cohen;Steven P. Cohen;Daniel J. Clauw;Geoffrey Littlejohn

  • Decreased Central μ-Opioid Receptor Availability in Fibromyalgia

    Richard E. Harris;Daniel J. Clauw;David J. Scott;Samuel A. McLean

  • Neurobiology of fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain.

    Kathleen A. Sluka;Daniel J. Clauw

  • Chronic pain and fatigue syndromes: Overlapping clinical and neuroendocrine features and potential pathogenic mechanisms

    Daniel J. Clauw;George P. Chrousos

  • Subgrouping of fibromyalgia patients on the basis of pressure-pain thresholds and psychological factors.

    Thorsten Giesecke;David A. Williams;Richard E. Harris;Thomas R. Cupps

  • Psychiatric disorders in patients with fibromyalgia: A multicenter investigation.

    Steven A. Epstein;Gary G. Kay;Daniel J. Clauw;Robert K. Heaton

  • Risedronate decreases biochemical markers of cartilage degradation but does not decrease symptoms or slow radiographic progression in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: results of the two-year multinational knee osteoarthritis structural arthritis study.

    Clifton O. Bingham;J. Chris Buckland-Wright;Patrick Garnero;Stanley B. Cohen

  • Chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia: what we know, and what we need to know

    Daniel J. Clauw;Leslie J. Crofford

  • The relationship between depression, clinical pain, and experimental pain in a chronic pain cohort

    Thorsten Giesecke;Richard H. Gracely;David A. Williams;Michael E. Geisser

  • Trends and predictors of opioid use after total knee and total hip arthroplasty.

    Jenna Goesling;Stephanie E. Moser;Bilal Zaidi;Afton L. Hassett

  • Persistent pain and depression: a biopsychosocial perspective

    Lisa C Campbell;Daniel J Clauw;Daniel J Clauw;Francis J Keefe;Francis J Keefe

  • Fibromyalgia: an overview.

    Daniel J. Clauw

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Harris
Richard E. Harris University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David A. Williams
David A. Williams Boston Children's Hospital
Richard H. Gracely
Richard H. Gracely University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke
Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke Ruhr University Bochum
Philip J. Mease
Philip J. Mease University of Washington
Emeran A. Mayer
Emeran A. Mayer University of California, Los Angeles
Vitaly Napadow
Vitaly Napadow Harvard University
Sean Mackey
Sean Mackey Stanford University
Leslie J. Crofford
Leslie J. Crofford Vanderbilt University Medical Center
A. Vania Apkarian
A. Vania Apkarian Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career paths in healthcare beyond a traditional MD. For those passionate about preventive medicine and public health, earning a nutrition bachelor degree online is a flexible way to enter fields focused on dietetics or wellness.

If you already work in healthcare administration, finding whats the best online mha program for working adults allows you to gain leadership skills while maintaining your career. Nursing professionals may consider career advancement through tailored programs, such as rn to bsn online programs without clinicals for registered nurses seeking a bachelor's degree more conveniently.

For those already holding a master's degree in nursing, the shortest post master's dnp program can accelerate your path to advanced clinical roles or leadership. Online programs offer flexibility, sometimes faster completion times, and specialized curricula, making them ideal for working professionals or those changing career directions within medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Clauw

Trending Scientists