World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10046 9426 552 528 473 34201

Winfried Häuser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Winfried Häuser between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Winfried Häuser published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2013. 23 of the 537 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2013. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 8 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 18 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 36 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

537 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Winfried Häuser: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 8
2003 1
2004 18
2005 6
2006 6
2007 9
2008 27
2009 21
2010 13
2011 22
2012 37
2013 41
2014 30
2015 34
2016 37
2017 31
2018 24
2019 36
2020 28
2021 23
2022 25
2023 25
2024 10
2025 22
2026 1
Total 537
Download as CSV

Winfried Häuser publications per year - data summary

  • Winfried Häuser, a Medicine scholar from Technical University of Munich, has 537 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 41 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 2001, 2003 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 30 years in the span carry no publications at all (1998, 1999 and 2000).
  • The rate of publication averages 17.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.9 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 83 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 41 publications (4.1 per year); 2007-2016: 271 publications (27.1 per year); 2017-2026: 225 publications (22.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Winfried Häuser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winfried Häuser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 473 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 473
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Winfried Häuser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Winfried Häuser, a Medicine scholar from Technical University of Munich, records 473 publications - the 53rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 53% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Winfried Häuser, and about 47% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Winfried Häuser ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Winfried Häuser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winfried Häuser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Winfried Häuser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Winfried Häuser, a Medicine scholar from Technical University of Munich, records 95 D-Index - the 51st percentile of the discipline.
  • 51% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Winfried Häuser, and about 49% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Winfried Häuser falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Winfried Häuser is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research interests encompass several topics including Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research, Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Pain Management and Opioid Use, Pain Management and Placebo Effect, and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments.

Winfried Häuser has contributed to numerous scientific publications, frequently appearing in journals such as Der Schmerz, European Journal of Pain, Pain, Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, and Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Winfried Häuser include:

  • Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions, 2021, The Lancet
  • Considering the potential for an increase in chronic pain after the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Pain
  • Emotion regulation and the salience network: a hypothetical integrative model of fibromyalgia, 2022, Nature Reviews Rheumatology
  • Empfehlungen der zweiten Aktualisierung der Leitlinie LONTS, 2020, Der Schmerz
  • European clinical practice recommendations on opioids for chronic noncancer pain - Part 1: Role of opioids in the management of chronic noncancer pain, 2021, European Journal of Pain

Key collaborators of Winfried Häuser include Mary-Ann Fitzcharles, Frank Petzke, Elmar Brähler, Jacob N. Ablin, and Thomas R. Tölle. Collaboration counts indicate ongoing professional relationships spanning numerous publications with these researchers.

Best Publications

  • 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria

    Frederick Wolfe;Daniel J. Clauw;Mary Ann Fitzcharles;Don L. Goldenberg;Don L. Goldenberg

  • Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia

    Frederick Wolfe;Daniel J. Clauw;Mary Ann Fitzcharles;Don L. Goldenberg

  • EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia

    G. J. Macfarlane;C. Kronisch;L. E. Dean;F. Atzeni

  • Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions

    Mary Ann Fitzcharles;Steven P. Cohen;Steven P. Cohen;Daniel J. Clauw;Geoffrey Littlejohn

  • Cannabis‐based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults

    Martin Mücke;Tudor Phillips;Lukas Radbruch;Frank Petzke

  • Fibromyalgia prevalence, somatic symptom reporting, and the dimensionality of polysymptomatic distress: results from a survey of the general population.

    Frederick Wolfe;Elmar Brähler;Andreas Hinz;Winfried Häuser

  • Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis Part 3: Special situations

    Gert Van Assche;Axel Dignass;Bernd Bokemeyer;Silvio Danese

  • Efficacy of different types of aerobic exercise in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

    Winfried Häuser;Petra Klose;Jost Langhorst;Babak Moradi

  • Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

    Winfried Häuser;Kathrin Bernardy;Nurcan Üçeyler;Claudia Sommer

  • Efficacy of multicomponent treatment in fibromyalgia syndrome: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

    Winfried Häuser;Kathrin Bernardy;Bernhard Arnold;Martin Offenbächer

  • Guidelines on the management of fibromyalgia syndrome – A systematic review

    Winfried Häuser;Kati Thieme;Dennis C. Turk

  • [The German Version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ): psychometric characteristics in a representative sample of the general population].

    Grit Klinitzke;Matthias Romppel;Winfried Häuser;Elmar Brähler

  • Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia

    Kathrin Bernardy;Petra Klose;Angela J Busch;Ernest H S Choy

  • Maltreatment in childhood and adolescence: results from a survey of a representative sample of the German population.

    Winfried Häuser;Gabriele Schmutzer;Elmar Brähler;Heide Glaesmer

  • Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies in Fibromyalgia Syndrome — A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Kathrin Bernardy;Nicole Füber;Volker Köllner;Winfried Häuser

  • Nocebo phenomena in medicine: their relevance in everyday clinical practice.

    Winfried Häuser;Ernil Hansen;Paul Enck

  • Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Winfried Häuser;Kathrin Bernardy;Nurcan Üçeyler;Claudia Sommer

  • Comparative efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in fibromyalgia syndrome: network meta-analysis

    Eveline Nüesch;Winfried Häuser;Kathrin Bernardy;Kathrin Bernardy;Jürgen Barth

  • Considering the potential for an increase in chronic pain after the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Daniel J. Clauw;Winfried Häuser;Steven P. Cohen;Steven P. Cohen;Mary Ann Fitzcharles

  • Systematic review with meta-analysis: cytokines in fibromyalgia syndrome

    Nurcan Üçeyler;Winfried Häuser;Claudia Sommer

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Henningsen
Peter Henningsen Technical University of Munich
Claudia Sommer
Claudia Sommer University of Würzburg
Frederick Wolfe
Frederick Wolfe University of Kansas
Thomas R. Tölle
Thomas R. Tölle Technical University of Munich
Elmar Brähler
Elmar Brähler Leipzig University
Lukas Radbruch
Lukas Radbruch University Hospital Bonn
Heide Glaesmer
Heide Glaesmer Leipzig University
Andreas Hinz
Andreas Hinz Leipzig University
Franz Petermann
Franz Petermann University of Bremen
Daniel J. Clauw
Daniel J. Clauw University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible education pathways, several online degree options can open new career opportunities. Nursing professionals, for example, may advance from registered nurse to nurse practitioner status through an rn to np bridge program designed for working adults aiming for higher clinical roles.

If you are passionate about nutrition and wellness, pursuing an online dietitian degree enables you to build a foundation for roles in healthcare settings, food services, and consulting—all from home.

Those considering healthcare administration can find out whats the best online mha program for working adults to develop leadership skills essential for hospital or clinic management, often with flexible online options.

Many RNs also benefit from efficient degree completion via an rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited program, allowing for professional advancement in a streamlined, remote learning format.

These degree pathways offer diverse opportunities for career growth and can be tailored to fit your schedule and aspirations in the expanding healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Winfried Häuser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles