World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5577 5178 262 258 296 14011

Peter Henningsen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Henningsen between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Henningsen published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2007. 42 of the 436 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2007. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 52 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 36 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 29 publications
1993 2025

436 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Henningsen: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 5
2004 9
2005 4
2006 11
2007 52
2008 17
2009 15
2010 18
2011 24
2012 19
2013 36
2014 16
2015 12
2016 17
2017 18
2018 16
2019 14
2020 15
2021 23
2022 20
2023 21
2024 13
2025 29
Total 436
Download as CSV

Peter Henningsen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Henningsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 296 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 296
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Henningsen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Henningsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Henningsen is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a significant focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health as well as Clinical Psychology. Additional subfields include Philosophy, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably:

  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Peter Henningsen has contributed to a variety of publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Scientific Reports

Frequent collaborators of this researcher consist of:

  • Constanze Hausteiner-Wiehle
  • Jochen Gensichen
  • Heribert Sattel
  • Antonius Schneider
  • Victoria von Schrottenberg

In terms of authored books, Henningsen has one published by Springer Nature titled Allgemeine Psychosomatische Medizin (2021) and another published by Aarhus University Press called Stavnsbåndet (2020).

The recent papers associated with Peter Henningsen include:

  • Functional somatic disorders: discussion paper for a new common classification for research and clinical use, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Fatigue, depression, and pain in multiple sclerosis: How neuroinflammation translates into dysfunctional reward processing and anhedonic symptoms, 2020, Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • Prevalence and overlap of somatic symptom disorder, bodily distress syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome in the German general population: A cross sectional study, 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Migraine in the context of chronic primary pain, chronic overlapping pain disorders, and functional somatic disorders: A narrative review, 2022, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
  • Anomalies in the review process and interpretation of the evidence in the NICE guideline for chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis, 2023, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Medically unexplained physical symptoms, anxiety, and depression: a meta-analytic review.

    Peter Henningsen;Thomas Zimmermann;Heribert Sattel

  • Psychosomatic Medicine in Germany: More Timely than Ever

    Stephan Zipfel;Wolfgang Herzog;Johannes Kruse;Peter Henningsen

  • Management of functional somatic syndromes.

    Peter Henningsen;Stephan Zipfel;Wolfgang Herzog

  • Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.

    Amelia Fiske;Peter Henningsen;Alena Buyx

  • Oxytocin enhances the experience of attachment security

    Anna Buchheim;Markus Heinrichs;Carol George;Dan Pokorny

  • Depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders: vague or distinct categories in primary care? Results from a large cross-sectional study.

    Gertraud Hanel;Peter Henningsen;Wolfgang Herzog;Nina Sauer;Nina Sauer

  • Management of Functional Somatic Syndromes and Bodily Distress.

    Peter Henningsen;Stephan Zipfel;Heribert Sattel;Francis Creed

  • Psychiatric comorbidity and psychosocial impairment among patients with vertigo and dizziness

    Claas Lahmann;Peter Henningsen;Thomas Brandt;Michael Strupp

  • Development and Validation of the Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale (SSD-12).

    Anne-Kristin Toussaint;Alexandra Murray;Katharina Voigt;Annabel Herzog

  • Is there a better term than "medically unexplained symptoms"?

    Francis Creed;Elspeth Guthrie;Per Fink;Peter Henningsen

  • Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: A Neuropsychobehavioral Model and Its Clinical Implications

    Peter Henningsen;Harald Gündel;Willem J Kop;Bernd Löwe

  • Brief relaxation versus music distraction in the treatment of dental anxiety: a randomized controlled clinical trial

    Claas Lahmann;Rainer Schoen;Peter Henningsen;Joram Ronel

  • Functional somatic disorders: discussion paper for a new common classification for research and clinical use

    Christopher Burton;Per Fink;Peter Henningsen;Bernd Löwe

  • Non-Specific, Functional, and Somatoform Bodily Complaints

    Rainer Schaefert;Constanze Hausteiner-Wiehle;Winfried Häuser;Joram Ronel

  • Patients with pain disorder show gray-matter loss in pain-processing structures: a voxel-based morphometric study.

    Michael Valet;Harald Gündel;Till Sprenger;Christian Sorg

  • Brief psychodynamic interpersonal psychotherapy for patients with multisomatoform disorder: randomised controlled trial

    Heribert Sattel;Claas Lahmann;Harald Gündel;Elspeth Guthrie

  • [Somatoform disorders].

    Unknown

  • Fibromyalgia syndrome: classification, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Winfried Häuser;Wolfgang Eich;Markus Herrmann;Detlev O. Nutzinger

  • Irritable bowel syndrome: Relations with functional, mental, and somatoform disorders

    Constanze Hausteiner-Wiehle;Peter Henningsen

  • Somatization revisited: diagnosis and perceived causes of common mental disorders.

    Peter Henningsen;Thorsten Jakobsen;Marcus Schiltenwolf;Mitchell G Weiss

  • Psychological burden of food allergy.

    Martin Teufel;Tilo Biedermann;Nora Rapps;Constanze Hausteiner

Frequent Co-Authors

Winfried Häuser
Winfried Häuser Technical University of Munich
Bernd Löwe
Bernd Löwe Universität Hamburg
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Stephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel University of Tübingen
Francis Creed
Francis Creed University of Manchester
Marianne Dieterich
Marianne Dieterich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Per Fink
Per Fink Aarhus University
Claudia Sommer
Claudia Sommer University of Würzburg
Thomas R. Tölle
Thomas R. Tölle Technical University of Munich
Kurt Kroenke
Kurt Kroenke Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of career pathways, including mental health, research, counseling, and social work. Many students with a background in psychology choose to pursue advanced degrees in related fields such as social work, which offers diverse roles in healthcare, education, and community services.

For those concerned about cost, there are most affordable online social work degree programs in Tennessee that blend flexibility with value. Those based in the Southern US may also benefit from most affordable social work degree programs in Arkansas, which can be ideal for residents seeking regional opportunities.

If you're looking for local programs, options like affordable social work degrees in Atlanta and most affordable social work degree programs in Arizona provide accessible educational pathways in major metropolitan and southwestern areas.

These affordable social work degree programs not only advance your academic qualifications but also expand your career horizons in high-demand fields, making education in psychology and related areas both practical and achievable.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Henningsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles